Intel Reveals Core i3, i5, i7 CPU Naming System

Today we know that the “Core” family for the performance segment goes mainly from Core 2 Duo to Core 2 Quad all the way to the top with Core i7. But with Core 2 on the way out to be replaced by new CPUs later this year, Intel needs to sort out its naming and branding conventions to that consumers will be able to figure out what they’re buying.

Intel corporate communications manager Bill Calder wrote in a blog post, “Today the Intel Core brand has a mind boggling array of derivatives (such as Core2 Duo and Core 2 Quad, etc). Over time those will go away and in its place will be a simplified family of Core processors spanning multiple levels: Intel Core i3 processor, Intel Core i5 processor, and Intel Core i7 processors.”

“Core i3 and Core i5 are new modifiers and join the previously announced Intel Core i7 to round out the family structure. It is important to note that these are not brands but modifiers to the Intel Core brand that signal different features and benefits,” Calder added.

The new Core line will be naturally be position from bottom to top Core i3, Core i5 and Core i7. The odd-numbers convention makes sense with the possibility that some consumers may confused Core 2 Duo and Quad with 2 and 4.

The desktop processors codenamed Lynnfield, which are due this fall, will marketed as both Core i5 or Core i7, depending upon the feature set and capability. Interestingly, all Clarksfield mobile chips will have the Core i7 name.

The lower-cost line will remain mostly unchanged with the Celeron being the entry point, the Pentium for basic computing and the Atom doing what it’s been doing to the netbook and MID segment.

“For PC purchasing, think in terms of good-better-best with Celeron being good, Pentium better, and the Intel Core family representing the best we have to offer,” said Calder. “This will be an evolutionary process taking place over time, and we acknowledge that multiple brands will be in the market next year including older ones, as we make the transition. But overall this is a good thing, designed to make it easier and more rational over the long run.”

Create a new thread in the UK News comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
  • FH
    Took a leaf from BMW, did they?
  • tinnerdxp
    What a crazy talk... I know everone is doing this at the moment, but WHY!? I need to know what type of core / clock / cache / architecture / manufacturing process the i3/i5/i7 are using in order to make an educated decision... not a silly guess... And about the "confusion" of the current names...
    Questions for you all:
    How many cores Core 2 Duo has?
    How many cores Core 2 Quad has?
    Yes - you have guessed it right - 2 and 4 respectively...
    Ok... have a look at this:
    How many cores does Core i3, Core i5 and Core i7 have?
    No idea??? Well.. there you go.

    I understand the need but don't like the solution... and why cannot we just use clock speed as we did at the good old days?
  • ducker19
    I agree with tinnerdxp has said. It is going to make it really confusing what processor and also what motherboard you will need to buy. We are going to have different socket motherboards for different processors. This doesn't help people buying parts to build there own machine.

    But I don't think Intel is thinking about system builders. I think they are trying to make it less confusing for the average joe who will buy an off the self machine.

    "I understand the need but don't like the solution... and why cannot we just use clock speed as we did at the good old days?"

    I don't think going back to a clock speed can work. I know of about 5 different laptop processors from Intel that all run at 2Ghz. How are we supposed to know which processor is the best if they only put the clock speed.

    It might be easier if they put a 'D' for Dual and 'Q' for Quad infront of the current system, ie Di3, Qi5.