Corsair CX450 PSU Review: Two Flavors, Tested and Compared

by
6 Comments

Ripple Measurements

To learn how we measure ripple, please click here.

The following table includes the ripple levels we measured on the CX450’s rails. The limits, according to the ATX specification, are 120mV (+12V) and 50mV (5V, 3.3V and 5VSB).

Corsair CX450 - CWT

Test12V5V3.3V5VSBPass/Fail
10% Load15.3mV8.3mV9.2mV6.2mVPass
20% Load20.0mV8.2mV9.9mV7.0mVPass
30% Load19.2mV8.2mV10.0mV7.3mVPass
40% Load19.6mV9.2mV10.5mV7.8mVPass
50% Load32.5mV9.1mV11.4mV8.2mVPass
60% Load32.3mV8.5mV12.0mV8.5mVPass
70% Load33.9mV10.4mV17.6mV8.7mVPass
80% Load28.3mV11.3mV15.6mV11.5mVPass
90% Load29.0mV12.3mV16.1mV12.1mVPass
100% Load30.6mV12.6mV17.0mV14.1mVPass
110% Load32.1mV13.5mV17.7mV16.3mVPass
Cros-Load 126.1mV7.3mV11.0mV8.7mVPass
Cross-Load 233.8mV13.7mV16.1mV12.2mVPass

Corsair CX450 - Great Wall

Test12V5V3.3V5VSBPass/Fail
10% Load22.8mV7.4mV7.1mV6.5mVPass
20% Load35.3mV8.8mV8.3mV7.0mVPass
30% Load54.7mV10.0mV9.2mV7.6mVPass
40% Load41.7mV10.6mV10.5mV8.1mVPass
50% Load37.1mV12.1mV11.5mV9.0mVPass
60% Load35.7mV14.4mV12.3mV9.8mVPass
70% Load35.3mV14.8mV14.0mV11.1mVPass
80% Load36.6mV14.7mV14.9mV12.8mVPass
90% Load39.0mV15.6mV16.7mV14.6mVPass
100% Load44.2mV17.9mV18.1mV14.9mVPass
110% Load48.1mV20.0mV18.6mV20.1mVPass
Cross-Load 154.1mV13.9mV15.5mV10.7mVPass
Cross-Load 245.2mV14.8mV13.7mV15.7mVPass


Comparison Graphs

The Great Wall-based unit's minor rails performed well. But ripple at +12V was higher than what we measured from CWT's model. That latter design served up excellent ripple suppression on all of its rails. To be sure, you don't often see 31 millivolt (mV) of ripple under full load at 47°C from a budget-oriented PSU.

Ripple Oscilloscope Screenshots - Great Wall

The following oscilloscope screenshots illustrate the AC (alternating current) ripple and noise registered on the main rails (+12V, 5V, 3.3V and 5VSB). The bigger the fluctuations on the screen, the bigger the ripple/noise. We set 0.01 V/Div (each vertical division/box equals 0.01V) as the standard for all measurements.  

Ripple at Full Load

Ripple at 110 Percent Load

Ripple at Cross-Load 1

Ripple at Cross-Load 2

MORE: Best Power Supplies

MORE: How We Test Power Supplies

MORE: All Power Supply Content

Previous Next
Summary
  1. Features & Specifications
  2. Unboxing Video
  3. Teardown & Component Analysis
  4. Load Regulation, Hold-Up Time & Inrush Current
  5. Efficiency, Temperature & Noise
  6. Protection Features & DC Power Sequencing
  7. Cross-Load Tests & Infrared Images
  8. Transient Response Tests
  9. Ripple Measurements
  10. EMI Pre-Compliance Testing
  11. Performance, Value, Noise & Efficiency
  12. Final Analysis
About the author
Aris Mpitziopoulos

Aris Mpitziopoulos is a Contributing Editor at Tom's Hardware US, covering PSUs.

Read more
This thread is closed for comments
6 comments
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
  • jpe1701
    Oh thank you Aris, I've been waiting for a review of this. It's always low in price and tempting to recommend but there weren't any reviews.
  • Darkbreeze
    Why do both of the review summary boxes list the Great Wall version? Both the one on the front page and the last page are the same. Seems like you ought to include a summary box for both versions since there seems to be some major differences between them. And even more so since you seem to indicate the CWT version is the better unit, but only include a summary box for the Great Wall unit.
  • crmaris
    This was not my choice. Initially the review had both summary boxes.
  • Darkbreeze
    I totally understand. No worries mate. Editorial has a bad habit of effectively pooping all over the independent contributors writing as well. Not surprising that they are doing so with your work, but I sure wish somebody in editorial would make a few changes to policy that keeps the finished product a bit more in line with what the contributor intended, which often they don't. In this case, it totally makes zero sense that they didn't leave it as you had it.
  • Rexper
    Quote:
    We preferred CWT's version of Corsair's CX450, but that doesn't mean you should avoid Great Wall's

    Not that we have a choice.
    Great article, once again, Aris!

    There is some controversy appearing relating to the fan bearings used in the CX450. JonnyGURU, who works at Corsair, claims both CX450 versions use a rifle bearing.
    Unfortunately, we can't know for certain until someone dismantles the fan.
    http://www.jonnyguru.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15943&page=2
  • Darkbreeze
    I don't think it even makes a tremendous amount of difference. Fan failure on power supplies due to bearing fatigue is the least of the issues I've usually seen in the past on older units. Plus, it's not terribly difficult to replace a PSU fan if you have at least of a modicum of common sense and don't possess four thumbs.

    If fan noise is the biggest worry, or bearing failure over the long term, then I'd say these are winners for the price point. Most would never hear them over the sound of the rest of the system in any case.
Most Popular
  1. EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G1+ PSU Review: Efficient And Silent
  2. NZXT Teams Up With Seasonic for Semi-Digital E Series PSUs
  3. EVGA 650 B3 PSU Review: No (Fixed) Cables Attached
The Latest On Tom's Hardware
Edition
Subscribe to our newsletter
Company
Resources
Other Purch sites
  • © 2019 Purch All Rights Reserved.