Page 2:Core i7-975 Extreme Details
Page 3:Overclocking/Memory Scaling
Page 4:Test Setup And Benchmarks
Page 5:Benchmark Results: Synthetics
Page 6:Benchmark Results: A/V Encoding
Page 7:Benchmark Results: Productivity
Page 8:Benchmark Results: Far Cry 2 And Stalker: Clear Sky
Page 9:Benchmark Results: Left 4 Dead, H.A.W.X, Grand Theft Auto 4
Page 10:Power Consumption
Benchmark Results: Far Cry 2 And Stalker: Clear Sky
With no anti-aliasing applied, the Core 2 Quad and Phenom II put quantifiable leads over the Core i7 lineup (by almost 10 fps at 1680x1050). Though the gap closes a bit at 1920x1200, it’s still clear that both older micro-architectures outclass Intel’s latest in certain gaming environments.
Even with anti-aliasing turned on (and a more intensive graphics workload applied to our reference GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 cards), the Phenom II and Core 2 Extreme maintain their faster frame rates at both benchmarked resolutions.
The Stalker: Clear Sky benchmark is incredibly demanding. We see the Core i7s eke out a small advantage at 1680x1050, which then shrinks as you step up to 1920x1200.
Add anti-aliasing to what was already an intensive test and you end up with two things: first, unplayable frame rates, and second, parity between all of the benchmarked processors. It’d take a heck of a lot more graphics muscle to uncover any difference between these CPUs under Stalker.
- Core i7-975 Extreme Details
- Overclocking/Memory Scaling
- Test Setup And Benchmarks
- Benchmark Results: Synthetics
- Benchmark Results: A/V Encoding
- Benchmark Results: Productivity
- Benchmark Results: Far Cry 2 And Stalker: Clear Sky
- Benchmark Results: Left 4 Dead, H.A.W.X, Grand Theft Auto 4
- Power Consumption