Workstation Graphics: 14 FirePro And Quadro Cards
-
Page 1:21 Graphics Cards, Benchmarked And Compared In Workstation Apps
-
Page 2:Benchmark System, Drivers, And Software
-
Page 3:AutoCAD 2013: 2D Results Overview
-
Page 4:AutoCAD 2013: 2D Results
-
Page 5:AutoCAD 2013: 3D Results Overview
-
Page 6:AutoCAD 2013: 3D Results
-
Page 7:Autodesk Inventor 2013: 3D Results
-
Page 8:Maya 2013: OpenGL Results
-
Page 9:SolidWorks 2013: Results Overview
-
Page 10:SolidWorks 2013: Results
-
Page 11:SPECviewperf 11: CATIA And EnSight Results
-
Page 12:SPECviewperf 11: LightWave And Maya Results
-
Page 13:SPECviewperf 11: Pro/ENGINEER And SolidWorks Results
-
Page 14:SPECviewperf 11: TCVIS And SNX Results
-
Page 15:OpenGL Synthetic: Unigine Heaven, Sanctuary, And Tropics
-
Page 16:OpenGL Synthetic: GPU Caps Viewer PostFX
-
Page 17:OpenGL Synthetic: TessMark (OpenGL 4.0)
-
Page 18:CUDA: iray Renderer + 3ds Max Results
-
Page 19:CUDA: Blender Results
-
Page 20:CUDA: Octane Results
-
Page 21:CUDA: FluidMark 1080p Results
-
Page 22:OpenCL: Bitmining Results
-
Page 23:OpenCL: LuxRender Results
-
Page 24:OpenCL: ratGPU Renderer Results
-
Page 25:Folding@Home: Single- And Double-Precision Results
-
Page 26:OpenCL: Single-Precision Financial Analysis Results
-
Page 27:OpenCL: Double-Precision Financial Analysis Results
-
Page 28:OpenCL: Encryption And Decryption Results
-
Page 29:OpenCL: Simulation And Function Results
-
Page 30:OpenCL: Image Processing Results
-
Page 31:OpenCL: Video Processing Results
-
Page 32:Efficiency
-
Page 33:Nvidia's Quadro K4000 And AMD's FirePro W7000 Get Recommendations
We put 14 professional and seven gaming graphics cards from two generations through a number of workstation, general-purpose computing, and synthetic applications. By the end of our nearly 70 charts, you should know which board is right for your workload.
A few months back, we benchmarked the current crop of workstation graphics cards in some of the latest titles, just for kicks (How Well Do Workstation Graphics Cards Play Games?). At the same time, we were in the process of putting the latest FirePro and Quadro products through our professional graphics suite, along with a number of desktop-oriented gaming boards. Well, after literally several hundred hours of benchmarking, we have the data to go along with that follow-up story (and the results that go into our Workstation Graphics 2013 Charts).
Competing Graphics Cards Overview
Our field of contenders includes all of the heavy hitters. We have Nvidia's flagship Quadro 6000, as well as AMD's FirePro W9000, though our focus is more on the sub-£800 category, since that's more in-line with practical budgets, even in the professional space.
A lot of readers requested that we also include desktop-oriented cards to see how they compare in workstation-class applications, so we added seven of those, too. It's actually interesting to track their performance in workloads like rendering, 2D drawing, and CAD with DirectX graphics output.
Here's a list of all of the cards we benchmarked:
| Nvidia | AMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Workstation (Current Generation) | Quadro K5000 Quadro K4000 | FirePro W9000 FirePro W8000 FirePro W7000 FirePro W5000 |
| Workstation (Previous Generation) | Quadro 6000 Quadro 5000 Quadro 4000 Quadro 2000 | FirePro V7900 FirePro V5900 FirePro V4900 FirePro V3900 |
| Gaming (Current Generation) | GeForce GTX 690 GeForce GTX Titan GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon HD 7990 Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition |
| Gaming (Previous Generation) | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon HD 6970 |
What We Couldn’t And Wouldn’t Include
AMD wasn't able to send over a FirePro W600 for our comparison. Interestingly, the company was willing to send over a FirePro S10000. This is a shame, since we wanted to dedicate analysis to the W600, since Nvidia doesn’t offer anything even remotely like it. A single-slot graphics card that can drive six monitors or projectors at the same time, and can even output six different audio streams would have been worth the effort, we think. Meanwhile, the FirePro S10000 card mentioned above, as well as Nvidia’s Tesla cards, are just too big for this story, though we do have a piece in the works covering Tesla. We also didn't include Nvidia's smaller Quadro 400 or 600, since they would have taken forever in some of our benchmarks, and wouldn’t have generated useable results in others due to their very limited performance.
- 21 Graphics Cards, Benchmarked And Compared In Workstation Apps
- Benchmark System, Drivers, And Software
- AutoCAD 2013: 2D Results Overview
- AutoCAD 2013: 2D Results
- AutoCAD 2013: 3D Results Overview
- AutoCAD 2013: 3D Results
- Autodesk Inventor 2013: 3D Results
- Maya 2013: OpenGL Results
- SolidWorks 2013: Results Overview
- SolidWorks 2013: Results
- SPECviewperf 11: CATIA And EnSight Results
- SPECviewperf 11: LightWave And Maya Results
- SPECviewperf 11: Pro/ENGINEER And SolidWorks Results
- SPECviewperf 11: TCVIS And SNX Results
- OpenGL Synthetic: Unigine Heaven, Sanctuary, And Tropics
- OpenGL Synthetic: GPU Caps Viewer PostFX
- OpenGL Synthetic: TessMark (OpenGL 4.0)
- CUDA: iray Renderer + 3ds Max Results
- CUDA: Blender Results
- CUDA: Octane Results
- CUDA: FluidMark 1080p Results
- OpenCL: Bitmining Results
- OpenCL: LuxRender Results
- OpenCL: ratGPU Renderer Results
- Folding@Home: Single- And Double-Precision Results
- OpenCL: Single-Precision Financial Analysis Results
- OpenCL: Double-Precision Financial Analysis Results
- OpenCL: Encryption And Decryption Results
- OpenCL: Simulation And Function Results
- OpenCL: Image Processing Results
- OpenCL: Video Processing Results
- Efficiency
- Nvidia's Quadro K4000 And AMD's FirePro W7000 Get Recommendations
What a failure.