Workstation Graphics: 14 FirePro And Quadro Cards

We put 14 professional and seven gaming graphics cards from two generations through a number of workstation, general-purpose computing, and synthetic applications. By the end of our nearly 70 charts, you should know which board is right for your workload.

A few months back, we benchmarked the current crop of workstation graphics cards in some of the latest titles, just for kicks (How Well Do Workstation Graphics Cards Play Games?). At the same time, we were in the process of putting the latest FirePro and Quadro products through our professional graphics suite, along with a number of desktop-oriented gaming boards. Well, after literally several hundred hours of benchmarking, we have the data to go along with that follow-up story (and the results that go into our Workstation Graphics 2013 Charts).

Competing Graphics Cards Overview

Our field of contenders includes all of the heavy hitters. We have Nvidia's flagship Quadro 6000, as well as AMD's FirePro W9000, though our focus is more on the sub-£800 category, since that's more in-line with practical budgets, even in the professional space.

A lot of readers requested that we also include desktop-oriented cards to see how they compare in workstation-class applications, so we added seven of those, too. It's actually interesting to track their performance in workloads like rendering, 2D drawing, and CAD with DirectX graphics output.

Here's a list of all of the cards we benchmarked:


Nvidia
AMD
Workstation
(Current Generation)
Quadro K5000
Quadro K4000
FirePro W9000
FirePro W8000
FirePro W7000
FirePro W5000
Workstation
(Previous Generation)
Quadro 6000
Quadro 5000
Quadro 4000
Quadro 2000
FirePro V7900
FirePro V5900
FirePro V4900
FirePro V3900
Gaming
(Current Generation)
GeForce GTX 690
GeForce GTX Titan
GeForce GTX 680
Radeon HD 7990
Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition
Gaming
(Previous Generation)
GeForce GTX 580
Radeon HD 6970

What We Couldn’t And Wouldn’t Include

AMD wasn't able to send over a FirePro W600 for our comparison. Interestingly, the company was willing to send over a FirePro S10000. This is a shame, since we wanted to dedicate analysis to the W600, since Nvidia doesn’t offer anything even remotely like it. A single-slot graphics card that can drive six monitors or projectors at the same time, and can even output six different audio streams would have been worth the effort, we think. Meanwhile, the FirePro S10000 card mentioned above, as well as Nvidia’s Tesla cards, are just too big for this story, though we do have a piece in the works covering Tesla. We also didn't include Nvidia's smaller Quadro 400 or 600, since they would have taken forever in some of our benchmarks, and wouldn’t have generated useable results in others due to their very limited performance.

Create a new thread in the UK Article comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
2 comments
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
  • sicofante
    How on earth could you miss the K2000? It's the direct competitor to the W5000!!!

    What a failure.
  • tricecold
    These video cards and driver tricks software companies and NVIDIA and AMD plays is pissing me off . I was turning 20 million polygons in Maya 20+FPS with HD7950 now some driver update it is slow as hell, but then in DX viewport it is 100+fps, switching tot Houdini which has 4 viewports #@$@#$@#$@# latest one OPENGL 3.2 my card is useless, buigs glitches slow as hell again, switch to one lower open gl version everything is fine, other people complaning about their brand new Quadro K4000 cards are a lot slower than their GTX 580s etc etc etc, get your standarts straight come on