Asus VG245H 24-inch FreeSync Gaming Monitor Review

Viewing Angles, Uniformity, Response & Lag

To learn how we measure screen uniformity, please click here.

If viewing angles are important to you, TN is not the best choice. At the 24" size, it’s not really a factor on the desktop for a single user, however. Our photos of the VG245H are typical of the technology. To the sides you can see a red/green shift and a significant light fall off. From the top, detail is reduced but you can still see all the brightness steps. And the shift in color there is pretty minor. The takeaway is that you need to use a little extra care to place the panel precisely in front of you and angled toward the eye. But once this is accomplished, there is no penalty in image quality.

Screen Uniformity

Our VG245H sample displayed excellent screen uniformity in all three tests. As we noted in the ANSI test, there is a slight rise in black levels down the right side, but all other areas are perfect to the naked eye. In the white field test, there is a center hotspot, but again, it can’t be seen. Color uniformity is among the best we’ve measured from any monitor in our database. Considering the price point, this is mighty impressive.

Pixel Response & Input Lag

Please click here to read up on our pixel response and input lag testing procedures.

It’s pretty easy to spot the 144Hz screens here. With only 75Hz to offer, the VG245H gives up a little speed to the others. Is it something you’ll notice? Doubtful, unless you are a highly-skilled professional gamer. Even then, we don’t expect an 11ms difference in lag to be a factor. Remember that this monitor sells for under $200, which is less than the other screens here and less than nearly every 24" adaptive-sync display we’re aware of. This level of performance is more than adequate for just about everyone.

Gaming With FreeSync

After spending time with the 180Hz PG248Q, we could easily spot the drop to 75Hz. But that doesn’t mean we didn’t enjoy playing games on the VG245H. Like every other FHD screen we’ve reviewed, it takes only modest video card power to take framerates to 75 even when games are set to their highest detail levels.

While a faster monitor may spoil you, this one will still have no trouble keeping play above 40 FPS unless you have an older graphics board. Our Radeon R9 285 is getting a little long in the tooth, but it still provides an excellent experience at this resolution. Far Cry 4 on Ultra detail maintained rates over 50 FPS and occasionally hit 75. Tomb Raider was also very playable on Ultimate detail and kept speeds solidly above 60 FPS even during the most intense moments.

At these refresh levels, Trace Free is a factor and its effects can be easily seen. Maxing the slider produces obvious ghosting and object trails both dark and light depending on content. The default setting is 60, which eliminates artifacts but introduces too much blur. 80 turns out to be the ideal setting, which balances both issues to an almost-invisible point.

This thread is closed for comments
17 comments
    Your comment
  • ohim
    75Hz should not have the "Gaming" Tag next to the product, this is Office class hardware territory, even with the FreeSync tech. I have 60Hz FreeSync monitor and i`m alwasy outside the range of Freesync.
  • Yuka
    I was wondering... Is there a chance for Toms to include Monitor OC? I have a feeling this monitor, as it is out of the box, is not telling the whole story...

    In any case, thanks for the review. For the price, it doesn't appeal to me, TBH. Not even for mundane tasks/use.

    Cheers!
  • ahnilated
    What is up with all these 24" crap resolution and refresh rate displays?
  • newton75x
    it is nice and everything but 75hz is a deal breaker for a gamer even in a low budget .
  • huilun02
    LG has 75Hz IPS Ultrawides...
    Just sayin
  • eklipz330
    i got a 32" 2K freesync VA panel for $100 more....
  • Michael_498
    @Ohim: This is a nice sentence. One says it, the others copy it. Like in School. But let's think about it (which is different from School). If we synchronize the whole line from game over graphics Card to, finally, the Screen, we don't Need really more than 50-60 Hz because we cannot recognize it. More is only needed without Synchronisation, if it works the way I mentioned, which is still a long way to go for the industry. So be careful with your claims, especially with "even with G-Sync".
  • ohim
    2383686 said:
    @Ohim: This is a nice sentence. One says it, the others copy it. Like in School. But let's think about it (which is different from School). If we synchronize the whole line from game over graphics Card to, finally, the Screen, we don't Need really more than 50-60 Hz because we cannot recognize it. More is only needed without Synchronisation, if it works the way I mentioned, which is still a long way to go for the industry. So be careful with your claims, especially with "even with G-Sync".


    I know what i`m talking about since i own a product as such, do you ? I`m gaming on a 3440x1440 34" LG monitor with freesync in the range of 40 to 60. In games like Battlefield 1 at Ultra i have the game sitting in that range and it is ok, but every other game will be way outside this range and thus making the FreeSync useless, Gsync at 60 Hz is just as useless.

    You might say turn v-sync on and/or cap frames at 60, that`s a no go, unnecessary input lag induced for the joy of smooth frames. If you play games competitively (you do call yourself a gamer and buy a gaming product) then you want as much FPS as you can get for fast reactions. Some might say what`s the point of 150 FPS if you have a 60 Hz monitor, it is all about input and reactions and it helps, so if you come with a 60Hz/75Hz monitor and call it a "gaming" monitor i will laugh in your face.

    Manufacturers are milking the hell out of the "gaming" tag, at this point this monitor has nothing special about it, it`s a TN 24" monitor with added Freesync (this costs almost nothing to implement) so why ask 200$ for a monitor that is normally 100-150$ and doesn`t have anything to do with gaming ?
  • Verrin
    I think the value here is fantastic, with FreeSync. I can understand that most people reading this are enthusiasts with bigger budgets and higher standards, but outside of this readership I don't think most people want to spend more than 150-200 dollars on a monitor.
  • Yuka
    209787 said:
    I think the value here is fantastic, with FreeSync. I can understand that most people reading this are enthusiasts with bigger budgets and higher standards, but outside of this readership I don't think most people want to spend more than 150-200 dollars on a monitor.


    And why would an enthusiast with a lesser budget want a Freesync monitor?

    For that price you're 100 times better off with a non-Freesync 120Hz TN monitor like this:

    https://www.amazon.com/Acer-GN246HL-Bbid-24-Inch-Display/dp/B00KO4518I/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1482255634&sr=8-3&keywords=120hz+monitor

    Cheers!
  • Verrin
    I'd imagine because to some people, the improved fidelity of 120Hz is not better than screen tearing. But the beauty here is that we have options-- I'd personally pick 60Hz FreeSync over 120Hz non-FreeSync (with preference to having both if I wasn't on a budget) but to each his own, right?

    73949 said:
    And why would an enthusiast with a lesser budget want a Freesync monitor? For that price you're 100 times better off with a non-Freesync 120Hz TN monitor like this: https://www.amazon.com/Acer-GN246HL-Bbid-24-Inch-Display/dp/B00KO4518I/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1482255634&sr=8-3&keywords=120hz+monitor Cheers!
  • Yuka
    209787 said:
    I'd imagine because to some people, the improved fidelity of 120Hz is not better than screen tearing. But the beauty here is that we have options-- I'd personally pick 60Hz FreeSync over 120Hz non-FreeSync (with preference to having both if I wasn't on a budget) but to each his own, right?


    True, but I still find it odd that someone would chose a very limited Freesync (or even GSync) range of operation over a *way* more fluid experience. I moved from a 60Hz -> 120Hz -> 144Hz w/Freesync and the difference from the 60Hz to the 120Hz is day and night, but 120Hz to 144Hz+FS is not that much. Having a big range for the Sync technologies is kind of a big deal. Having only 40Hz of lower limit (mine has 35Hz) will still give you tearing when the (budget scenario) GPU can't push the pixels fast enough. At 120Hz, the screen refresh is so fast the tearing is lessened by a huge amount, so it becomes less of an issue; still there, but not as bad as 60Hz.

    In any case, you are right; more choice is better. Although I'm still puzzled on why you would go with this monitor.

    Cheers!
  • Verrin
    73949 said:
    In any case, you are right; more choice is better. Although I'm still puzzled on why you would go with this monitor. Cheers!


    In my case, I'm extremely sensitive to stutters and screen tearing. I can see both, clears as day, regardless of refresh rate. FreeSync/G-Sync has been the only legitimate solution to these visual artifacts. So 60Hz that allows for some frame dips with FreeSync to prevent vsync stutters is infinitely more pleasing to the eye than 120Hz with stutters and/or screen tearing, for me personally. I am aware however, not everyone notices or even sees either of these. What we perceive is a subjective affair.
  • rwinches
    This AOC reviewed here at TH is $199 on Amazon just click the link in the review.
    144Hz FreeSync between 35 and 144Hz.

    "For its solid image quality, trouble-free 144Hz refresh rate, and wide FreeSync range, we’re giving it our Tom’s Hardware Editor Approved Award."

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/aoc-g2460pf-24-inch-144hz-freesync-monitor,4743.html

    AMAZON LINK:

    https://www.amazon.com/AOC-G2460PF-24-Inch-Gaming-Monitor/dp/B01BV1XBEI/?&tag=bom-tomshardware-20&ascsubtag=[site|thaus[cat|[art|[pid|B01BV1XBEI[tid|14823485675302[bbc|LESPRIX
  • ArushK
    Anyone know if 75Hz is possible without freesync enabled on this monitor (using an nvidia card)?
  • Yuka
    2401553 said:
    Anyone know if 75Hz is possible without freesync enabled on this monitor (using an nvidia card)?


    Short answer: yes.

    Long answer: The name "Freesync" is just a piece of functionality that gets marketed but does not affect proper functionality. That is to say: any Freesync monitor will still work as a regular monitor. So, that implies, you can plug it into any video card you want and it will give you up-to 144Hz, but without "Freesync". Or at least, that is how I understand it. Plus, they have to accept any DisplayPort and HDMI certified device anyway; those standards don't imply GSync nor Freesync.

    Cheers!

    EDIT: Typos.
  • ColeJJones
    Perfect monitor for console gamers. It's perfect for the PS4 Pro which puts out 60fps max consistently.