AOC C4008VU8 UHD Monitor Review

Grayscale, Gamma & Color

Grayscale Tracking

The C4008VU8 comes set to its Standard picture mode and Warm color temp preset. That locks you into the DCI-P3 color gamut, which is fine for most applications. We tested the sRGB option in addition to evaluate the monitor’s accuracy in a more common gamut.

Our grayscale and gamma tests are described in detail here.

Standard mode with Warm color temp measures well out of the box except for the 90 and 100% levels, which are too blue. In actual content, the error is barely visible, so the C4008VU8 can easily be used without calibration. The only drawback is that you’re locked into the DCI-P3 color gamut, which is significantly more saturated than sRGB. For most content, it looks fine, but if you seek accuracy, the only option is to select sRGB from the color temp menu. That reigns in the gamut, but whites become very warm with errors across the board. The average value is 7.8dE and brightness is locked at 185cd/m2.

When we calibrated in the user color temp, we got roughly the same numbers as Warm. Blue errors have been reduced, but some red has crept into the lower steps. The visual result is almost indistinguishable. We suspect most users will simply leave their settings alone and adjust brightness to taste, and that produces a very good image.


You can see our calibration did not produce any gain in accuracy. While 1.71 and 1.74dE are decent numbers, the other screens are capable of better. Since the sRGB preset has a high 7.8dE average error, we don’t recommend it. Our preference was to accept the wider DCI-P3 gamut and leave the User color temp at its calibrated settings.

Gamma Response

Regardless of other settings, the C4008VU8 offers the same consistent gamma tracking in the number one preset. In Standard, before and after calibration, the trace hugs the line until 90% where there is a small but invisible dip, corresponding to a rise in luminance. The sRGB preset trades that for a dip at 10%. That will bring out some shadow detail, but again, it’s a barely noticeable error. If you decide to calibrate the RGB sliders, you must reduce Contrast by at least 10 clicks to reproduce our results.


All the displays have tight gamma tracking near the 2.2 mark except the XB321HK, which runs a little dark. Visually, there is little difference, but the C4008VU8’s higher contrast means much greater image depth and a picture that looks sharper and more three-dimensional.

Color Gamut & Luminance

For details on our color gamut testing and volume calculations, please click here.

In the first chart, it’s easy to see the C4008VU8’s extended color gamut. AOC has wisely kept luminance levels near-neutral, which means the overall errors are low. Without adjustment, the average DeltaE is just 2.26. And if you look at each color, only red is significantly over-saturated. Green and blue are much closer to the mark. Plus, tracking stays close to target until the gamut’s limit is reached.

If you need an accurate sRGB gamut, the sRGB color temp mode delivers. It’s too bad it won’t render the same accuracy in grayscale tracking, which is quite warm. This is what we meant by compromise when calibrating. You can’t quite have it all with this monitor. But if DCI-P3 is what you’re after, it’s one of the only displays out there that can nail it perfectly. The last two charts show our measurements against that standard. The error falls to just 1.88dE then, better than the sRGB value. That makes the C4008VU8 a great display for Ultra HD Blu-ray since those discs are mastered with extended color.


2.14dE is a perfectly respectable result, but it isn’t up to the capabilities of the other monitors here because they are strictly sRGB screens. That AOC can make a DCI-P3 display work well for sRGB/Rec.709 content is a testament to engineering and compromise. Extra color saturation can often make the picture look artificial and over-blown, but the C4008VU8 doesn’t suffer from that problem.

Since sRGB volume is well over 100%, we recommend a custom profile if you plan to proof material on this monitor. We also calculated DCI-P3 volume and came up with a 94.32% result. That is due to a slight under-saturation in the green primary.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: Best Professional Monitors

MORE: How We Test Monitors

MORE: How To Choose A Monitor

MORE: All Monitor Content

This thread is closed for comments
    Your comment
  • RobertGru
    Why not just buy an LG 43" 4K TV for $400.
  • venelin.mihaylov
  • sargentchimera
    I have a 43in Sony Bravia X800D TV I bought for ~$650, I bought it specifically for its size and HDR capability. If this had been out 8 months ago I think I would of bought it instead. The review mentioned not all HDR TVs fully benefit from their HDR, I wonder if mine is in that boat... I do notice a difference with it on but perhaps the effect is not as strong as it could be. I wonder if the picture would be better on this monitor.
  • JonDol
    When I saw the title I hoped for a second that the first 4K monitor that is worth the money has arrived. Too bad it isn't it.
  • Zerstorer1
    40" Samsung KU6300 HDR 4K 4:4:4 60 fps gaming for 399. Been using it for year as my personal desktop screen.
  • Zerstorer1
    I've been using a Samsung KU6300 for year now. Got it for 399. Heal of deal. Supports 4:4:4 and HDR 60 fps at 4k gaming.
  • hannibal
    Why so? This monitor is very well worth of its money!
    It is big and picture quality is nice!
    Even 27" 4K monitors cost almost 600-1000$
    And if it is any better... it is even more expensive.

    Hopefully we will get HDR and freesync version below 1500$ sooner than later. That would be bargain!
  • Brian_R170
    I bought a Samsung UN40KU6290 40-inch 4K TV last November from Costco for $289 to use as a monitor for my gaming system. There are usually a lot of trade-offs when using a TV as a monitor, and I agree that using a purpose-built computer monitor should always be better. Still, if you can find a TV that meets your own minimum requirements, you can save a LOT of money.
  • Brian_R170
    Zerstorer1, +1 on the KU6300. Reviews said it's the same as my KU6290 but has a fancy remote. The only thing I miss that a purpose-built computer monitor would have is auto-sensing the inputs to automatically power-on from standby. The KU will automatically go to standby after it senses all inputs are lost for a few minutes, but it doesn't power-on automatically.
  • Max_x2
    I'm wondering in the warm whites are often a problem with AOC. I returned one couple years because of that, and, you know, it kinda left a bad aftertaste.
  • AnimeMania
    I was hoping you would have included a close-up photo of the connection ports on the back, they look interesting.
    a 800$ monitor without HDR yea right
  • ahnilated
    I was tempted until I saw "curved". I am so sick of the curved crap.
  • irtehyar
    Please let curved finish dying already. :(
  • photonboy
    Why not 4K HDTV? They literally answer that question in the first paragraph.

    I don't think you can select resolutions like 2560x1440 either so it can be problematic for gaming.
  • bksk1932
    Hi ..Buy a Sony Bravo TV like $3.5k in 2007 ...print this article and then eat it....
    or rewrite it....
  • 10tacle
    Decent price for such a large 4K 10-bit monitor, but no HDR support and no Freesync is a deal killer. I'd have been willing to pay $200 more for HDR10 and Freesync support. Like many, I have an Xbox One X on pre-order and am in the market for a 4K HDR monitor to take advantage of it. Looking to replace the 32" 1080p desktop HDTV used for my PS4. I do not game in my living room where my 4K HDR10 TV is.
  • hannibal
    4K tv is not a monitor, even you can use it like monitor. There is big difference in there...
  • rwinches
    If you buy a large expensive monitor like this you are going to use a VESA mount that gives wide range of adjustment and stability.
    If there is no 'perfect monitor' then there is no point in the mention.
    Like their excellent 144Hz 1080p 24" monitor at $200 that they followed up with a same spec Freesync monitor for $220-$250 street (both favorably reviewed by Toms) I believe AOC will offer an improved version of this 4K for a reasonable price.
    Wow, what a weak list of cons and no recommendation?
    No gaming impressions? Is it only good for productivity SW?
    No pic of a bunch of apps open on the screen or a full screen spreadsheet or split screen?
  • zodiacfml
    The introduction is quite misleading leading me to think that this goes beyond 60Hz. This is no different from Philips' 40inch and above 4K monitors.
  • 10tacle
    191196 said:
    The introduction is quite misleading leading me to think that this goes beyond 60Hz. This is no different from Philips' 40inch and above 4K monitors.

    If you are referring to this opening paragraph comment:

    It’s not too hard to find a 40” or larger Ultra HD TV at the local wholesale club for less than $1000. But going this route can have a few downsides. First off, you won’t find a consumer TV with DisplayPort. And more importantly, most sets won’t accept signals above 60Hz, even if they refresh at a higher rate.

    They are referring to the extremely limited availability of 4K HDTVs <$1K with >60Hz refresh rate capability, and this one is no exception. That's the way I read it initially, but I now see where it can be interpreted that this set does run higher than 60Hz and is an ambiguous statement.
  • Zerstorer1
    Well that is debatable to a degree. My Samsung KU6300 has an option to specify that a PC card is hook up to it. Once it has done that, the 4:4:4 text mode kicks in for super crisp text and also enables full HDR for vivid deep color as well as 60 FPS / refresh at 3840x2160. My 1080 TI runs all my games at 4K at 60 FPS. Now obviously its capped at 60 FPS, but for $400 at a 40" screen with HDR. Plus I get to use 4K Netflix, 4K Hulu, 4k Amazon with multiple additional inputs. Kinda sinks the battle ship of these $1000+ dollar 28"-32" monitors they are hustling in my opinion. Now get this I have been reading that Samsung is bringing free-sync to their TV line up at the end of the year, although that's only good for AMD cards. So might switch to Vega next year and get another $400-500 Samsung that will have access to 144 refresh, plus all the previous mentioned goodies. Just my 2 cents.
  • photonboy
    2536519 said:
    Hi ..Buy a Sony Bravo TV like $3.5k in 2007 ...print this article and then eat it.... or rewrite it....

    I bought a Sony Bravia 32", 768p HDTV probably about 2007 and it's still going strong. Paid $3,500 (CDN) for the 768p as it was 5K for the 1080p version. Still pretty good picture.

    In fact, it has way better speakers than any HDTV today from what I can see (probably not much proportionate cost to use good speakers when the TV was so expensive).