Acer Predator Z35 35-inch Curved G-Sync Monitor Review

Viewing Angles, Uniformity, Response, Lag, G-Sync And ULMB

To learn how we measure screen uniformity, please click here.

We've been a tad disappointed by AMVA's viewing angles in the past. Off-axis image quality falls somewhere between TN and IPS. Detail is preserved well from both the sides and top but light falloff is significant and there's a red/green shift as well. It is easy to find a good viewing position from head-on even though the screen is over 30-inches wide. And multi-panel installations work fine too thanks to the 2000R curvature. While IPS still offers the best off-axis performance, VA is clearly better than TN.

Screen Uniformity: Luminance

Our sample shows superb screen uniformity in the black field test with no visible light bleed. Even in a completely darkened room, the pattern looks smooth in tone from edge to edge. Definitely nothing to see here.

Here's the white field measurement.

The white field test result is a little weaker but still well within the realm of excellence. We couldn't see any hotspots here either.

Screen Uniformity: Color

The Z35's color uniformity is mostly good but we saw slight shifts in the bottom two corners of the screen. It's not a problem in actual content but a little green tint was visible in our sample.

Pixel Response And Input Lag

Please click here to read up on our pixel response and input lag testing procedures.

We expected to see a top result at 200Hz with overdrive on Extreme and that's precisely what we got. While we're showing the monitor's full potential here there are some caveats that we'll get into below. Some ghosting is visible and we saw a black trail artifact behind moving objects when running at top speed. There is a significant improvement in motion detail when it's engaged however, so we suggest trying the various settings to see what works best for you.

Here are the lag results.

200Hz is the way to go for the least input lag. Though the Z35's three millisecond advantage over a 144Hz monitor is small, this price category is all about that last nth degree of performance. If you want the fastest display on the block, this new Acer is it.

G-Sync, ULMB And Overdrive

Normally at this point we'd talk about our gameplay experience and how G-Sync and ULMB impact motion processing and detail. But first we'll tell you about a few things we discovered in our motion pattern tests.

At Blurbusters.com there is an extensive suite of motion tests that make it easier to see things like ghosting, motion detail artifacts, overdrive problems and frame skipping. We usually run through these routines before trying actual content; and the majority of gaming screens show no issues. The Z35 however did present a couple of things at 200Hz that we hadn't seen before.

In one test, we try different overdrive settings to see if ghosting occurs. At the Z35's Extreme setting we saw slight white trails behind moving objects but that's not unusual, and not visible during gameplay. What we did see in both test patterns and games however was a black trail. This seems indicative of undershoot where the frame rate is so high, some pixels just don't have a chance to admit light during the refresh cycle. The fix was to turn down OD to Normal. The black trails were still visible but far less so. The only way to eliminate them entirely is to turn OD off but that causes softness that we just couldn't live with. OD Normal is the best compromise.

Of course, there is another solution—ULMB—but that means turning off G-Sync and running at 120Hz max. While this would seem to defeat the purpose of buying a monitor like this, it was the best quality we saw from the Z35. Of course the caveat is you need to keep frame rates above 100 to mitigate frame tears. We could still see them here and there but not enough to distract. If you don't have sufficient processing power to keep the fps that high, you will see more obvious tearing.

So the conclusion from our gameplay sessions is that this particular monitor doesn't quite nail the fast refresh rate as well as the Asus PG279Q. That screen looked great at 165Hz but the Z35 starts to show a few flaws above 144Hz.

This thread is closed for comments
53 comments
    Your comment
  • Realist9
    "2560x1080" at 35 " in 2016. That's a joke, right?
  • SBMfromLA
    Quote:
    "2560x1080" at 35 " in 2016. That's a joke, right?


    Not really....
  • DanT060
    not 4K no
  • Realist9
    The only 'gamer' I see buying this monitor is one that wants super mega hecka uber duper high refresh rate for their twitch FPS and doesn't care that the image looks crappy.

    Seriously, why not 1440, at least?
  • SBMfromLA
    1675488 said:
    The only 'gamer' I see buying this monitor is one that wants super mega hecka uber duper high refresh rate for their twitch FPS and doesn't care that the image looks crappy. Seriously, why not 1440, at least?



    Some people feel a need to have the "latest and greatest"...
  • turkey3_scratch
    1675488 said:
    The only 'gamer' I see buying this monitor is one that wants super mega hecka uber duper high refresh rate for their twitch FPS and doesn't care that the image looks crappy. Seriously, why not 1440, at least?


    It's a simple answer: CSGO. Competitive players want these high refresh rates.
  • envy14tpe
    Quote:
    1675488 said:
    The only 'gamer' I see buying this monitor is one that wants super mega hecka uber duper high refresh rate for their twitch FPS and doesn't care that the image looks crappy. Seriously, why not 1440, at least?
    It's a simple answer: CSGO. Competitive players want these high refresh rates.


    Don't forget us BF4 players. We like the high refresh rates too. But for $300-400 less you could get a 1440p IPS panel like the PG279Q that runs up to 165Hz. That's why this bigger screen seems kinda weird given the price. At that price resolution should matter more.
  • Jack_565
    "You'll need to use the former for G-Sync and for 200Hz operation, which also requires a GeForce GTX960 BOOST or better"
    Could someone clarify what a 960 BOOST is, a OC'd 960?
  • ohim
    The thing with G-Sync is that every gamer in Battlefield 4 forums said that they use their monitors without G-Sync when gaming at 144hz, i asked them why and they all replied that it`s a pointless tech at that fps speed.. so practically you pay for G-sync only on the slower games where you can`t reach to fast fps.
  • Max_x2
    Did any of you actually read the article? First paragraph under the specs, right on the first page:

    "Those who have browsed the specs certainly noticed the 2560x1080 pixel resolution. That's something we weren't thrilled to see in the XR3501 either but after testing and playing games on it for a while, the lower pixel density became a non-issue. We continue to maintain that contrast is the most important factor in image quality, not resolution. And the Z35 is no different."
  • vaughn2k
    Wake me up if the price goes down.. :)
  • SpAwNtoHell
    I can live with the resolution as it eliminates the need for 3 monitor setup were in my opinion half of each left and right monitor are waisted, i like the contrast, gsync for slower games but not sure i can leave with the artifacts considering the price tag.... For this reason i am looking forward for the lenovo y27g amva panel with gsync 144hz ... As seems the only cons would be the fact that is a fhd res in a 27" but seems far better then a wide hd on a 35" like this one... I am hunting for a monitor to be pleased with for almost a year now but this certanly is not it tho close, as i would not settle for tn and ips low contrast...
  • George Phillips
    At any size, 4k resolution will not work at 200hz and will have lags and won't run well with any graphics cards. 2560x1080 native resolution is perfectly fine and can produce high frame rates with many cards. I just wish there is a cheaper and smaller version with similar specs at a much lower price. Priced at $1000 and only for gaming? It's a no no.
  • Peter Martin
    I will NEVER buy another curved screen anything. You manufacturers really think we are stupid, don't you?
  • Eggz
    When are we going to see a 21:9 OLED display with adaptive refresh as a non-proprietary feature on DisplayPort 1.3 running at 5160x2160?

    It would essentially be 4k but at a 21:9 aspect ratio. I'd be all over that!
  • xapoc
    dear Santa..
  • cknobman
    Over $1000 for THIS??????

    For 1080p??????

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    frikin gsync tax
  • Uri___Pisarev
    Quote:
    The only 'gamer' I see buying this monitor is one that wants super mega hecka uber duper high refresh rate for their twitch FPS and doesn't care that the image looks crappy. Seriously, why not 1440, at least?


    My monitor is 1440, there's nothing special about it. Just because the number is bigger doesn't mean it is better. I have a 34 inch Ultrawide, 1440 is not all it is cracked up to me.
  • Uri___Pisarev
    Quote:
    I will NEVER buy another curved screen anything. You manufacturers really think we are stupid, don't you?


    Why, it does make experience more immersive. I have a Dell U3415W, the curvature is very mild, it is so mild that i honestly forget that it is curved. I think that type of a display is best, it is more immersive than a flat panel but not as absurd as some monitors are.
  • picture_perfect
    Edit: I changed my mind on this particular monitor.
    Except for the slower response time TFT Central mentioned it's pretty awsome :)
    The below doesn't really apply here.


    Hz are pointless without a matching FRAME RATE. 200hz gets you nothing if you can only average 60fps. Additional Hz contribute NOTHING visually or functionally. *Some* monitors fail with their emphasis on high resolutions / high Hz while ignoring frame rates. It's frame rates that do what people want (1) reduce stutter (2) decrease input lag (3) reduce blur. Hz only serve as their medium. You need both so don't fall for the marketing hype, like 20,000 dpi mice.

    1080p @ 120fps vsync'd beats 1440p @ 60fps gsync'd every time:
    1/2 the blur
    1/2 the lag
    no "below 40fps" stutter

    What I mean is Hz are fine but only if you have horsepower to back it up. *Some* monitors make it impossible without SLI, All of which helps explains this:

    Quote:
    every gamer in Battlefield 4 forums said that they use their monitors without G-Sync when gaming at 144hz, i asked them why and they all replied that it`s a pointless tech at that fps speed..
  • moogleslam
    Still waiting for 21:9, 34", 3440x1440p, G-Sync, 144Hz.... Getting close.
  • g-unit1111
    That is an insane amount of money for an ultrawide display with a 144hz refresh rate. For that price you can go for a 1440P ultrawide for less money. You don't get the refresh rate, but $1K or more for a 1080P display? Get real!
  • liteup23
    Quote:
    Still waiting for 21:9, 34", 3440x1440p, G-Sync, 144Hz.... Getting close.


    I'm waiting for the same thing... only difference being that I would settle for 90Hz if the price was right. I've been waiting for almost 2 years now. When is someone going to wake up and make this monitor?
  • moogleslam
    628648 said:
    Quote:
    Still waiting for 21:9, 34", 3440x1440p, G-Sync, 144Hz.... Getting close.
    I'm waiting for the same thing... only difference being that I would settle for 90Hz if the price was right. I've been waiting for almost 2 years now. When is someone going to wake up and make this monitor?


    If you're happy with 90Hz, two such monitors already exist. Both the Acer Predator x34 & the ASUS PG348Q meet that criteria (100Hz)