Page 1:Comparing Box Coolers
Page 2:Prescott FMB2 C40387 - The Prescott's First Cooler
Page 3:Performance FMB2 RCFH-4 – Loudest. Cooler. Ever.
Page 4:XP01 S2683 – Bigger Copper Core and greater Contact Pressure
Page 5:Box Cooler for E6700 and Q6600 Series
Page 6:Slower Fans for E6300 and E6400 Series
Page 7:Off the Cheap End – Aluminium for low-end CPUs
Page 8:Thermal Compound - The Right Stuff
Page 9:Tom's Hardware Performance Results
Page 10:Cooling Performance
Page 12:Weight and Fan Speed
Page 13:Conclusion - Box Coolers not a good Choice for Overclockers
Cooler Charts 2008
Among the enthusiast crowd, it is more or less a matter of course to equip a computer with a powerful CPU cooler. After all, thanks to their better design and construction, most aftermarket air cooling solutions offer better cooling performance while running at lower noise levels than their boxed brethren. Depending on the performance class, the CPUs come with more or less massive coolers. We were interested in finding out how the box cooler fare compared to aftermarket solutions and especially in what respects the coolers differ. After all, the higher-end coolers found in stores can cost upwards of €50. That’s a fair bit of money, especially considering that some people try to save as much money as they can when shopping for a CPU.
In the first part of this series, CPU Cooler Charts 2008, Part I - Losing your Cool ?, we found that nearly half of the aftermarket coolers we reviewed suffered from some serious flaws, the second part, CPU Cooler Charts 2008, Part II - Junk or Jewel ?, ended with a better overall result.
In this instalment, we will take a look at coolers that ship with CPUs in the retail box – the so-called box coolers. In the process, we will meet a few familiar faces, namely Intel’s selection of bundled coolers, which represent something of a reference point for each CPU class. The question we will attempt to answer is this – are box coolers sufficient or are you better off opting for an aftermarket cooler upgrade ?
To make this comparison more interesting, we compiled a test field consisting of various coolers for the socket 775 platform. These include such exotic models as the first engineering samples that accompanied the Prescott launch and the legendary Performance FMB that Intel released upon launching the first dual-core Extreme models. They will square off against three conventional box coolers that are included with Intel’s current Conroe-based Core 2 line of processors .
Previous instalments of this series :
|3R System||Antazone||Arctic Cooling|
If you are interested in our test methodology and how we rate the products, feel free to read up on these points here :
- Comparing Box Coolers
- Prescott FMB2 C40387 - The Prescott's First Cooler
- Performance FMB2 RCFH-4 – Loudest. Cooler. Ever.
- XP01 S2683 – Bigger Copper Core and greater Contact Pressure
- Box Cooler for E6700 and Q6600 Series
- Slower Fans for E6300 and E6400 Series
- Off the Cheap End – Aluminium for low-end CPUs
- Thermal Compound - The Right Stuff
- Tom's Hardware Performance Results
- Cooling Performance
- Weight and Fan Speed
- Conclusion - Box Coolers not a good Choice for Overclockers