USB and HD Comparison

03:00 - Thursday 27 May 2004 by THG Reporting Team
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: ximeta, netdisk, office, reviewed, netdiskoff

USB and HD Comparison

Ad

I also did IOzone runs using the Office's USB2 interface and the 80GB Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 ATA/133 drive in the IOzone test machine. In general, cached performance was comparable, but I thought the non-cached results were interesting.

Figure 8: Comparison of non-cached Write performance - 1GByte file size
(click on the image for a larger view)

Figures 8 and 9 show fastest non-cached Write and Read speed is obtained using the Office's USB2 interface - beating out even the internal hard drive. The read testing, however, showed a significant drop in HD performance such that the Office NDAS mode was about comparable to the Maxtor drive.

Figure 9: Comparison of non-cached Read performance - 1GByte file size
(click on the image for a larger view)

Keep in mind, though, that sharing the disk via NDAS mode can also incur a performance hit due to contention from multiple users. In all, however, I'd say you'll be happy with NetDisk's speed no matter which way you use it.


Ad
Talkback
Google Ads
Ad