Conclusion
We calculated average performance levels for each application test suite (games, encoding, and productivity). Averaging these results allows us to consider the combined performance of each motherboard, with the fastest model chosen as a baseline.
With a base clock of 133.7 MHz, the MSI X58 Platinum comes in second place for overall performance. Asus’ P6T wins, in spite of its smaller 0.20% base-clock "nudge" (133.6 MHz). With a performance advantage of over 2% over the Foxconn, DFI, ASRock, Biostar, and EVGA products, Asus could have easily won the performance comparison even without its 0.20% base clock advantage. Exceptional performance at its stock settings earns Asus' P6T a spot in each Tom's Hardware lab as our reference platform for 2009.

Overclockers will of course seek even greater performance benefits from added clock speed, a fact that allows EVGA’s top CPU overclock to more than offset its last-place performance finish.
Foxconn’s Renaissance offers the most features for the money, though its slot configuration isn’t favorable to multiple double-slot graphics cards. For that we again choose EVGA, a product that supports splitting of one set of slot pathways across two slots for better 3-way SLI performance. The X58 3X SLI also better-supports overclocking of two graphics cards, since the added space between its full-x16 slots allows better cooling.
EVGA’s X58 3X SLI is thus our preferred choice among sub-$300 motherboards for use in overclocked, high-end gaming configurations. Anyone taking score can call that a win.
With a similar slot layout to EVGA, DFI’s LANParty DK X58-T3eH6 provides a similar cooling advantage in two-card graphics configurations. And while it doesn’t offer the same level of 3-way SLI support as EVGA, its lower price keeps it in the running.
The cheapest of today’s competitors, the MSI X58 Platinum SLI is also a great choice for value-conscious SLI system builders, though we choke a little when trying to put “value-conscious” and “SLI” in the same sentence.
Enough differences in features and price exist between all of today’s motherboards that each builder should carefully reconsider such items as onboard controllers, slot type, and slot placement before taking any of our recommendations as a cause to buy. Everyone has slightly different needs, and while some builders may choose to load up the Foxconn Renaissance with four single-slot graphics cards to support eight displays, others will pack the EVGA 3X SLI with three GTX 285’s for a single display. Whatever your needs, we’re almost certain that one of today’s sub-$300 products can suit them.
- Hardware,
- x58 ,
- motherboard ,
- i7
Latest Motherboards News
- 25/05 – Thunderbolt Will Become Key Motherboard Spec in 2H 2012
- 22/05 – Does Your AMD FX Platform BSOD with Steam? Read This.
- 04/05 – 54 Million Enthusiast and Performance PC Gamers Globally
- 01/05 – Intel's Next Unit of Computing Rivals Raspberry Pi in Size
- 10/04 – Intel P67 Express Chipset Begins Product Discontinuance Cycle
Latest Motherboards reviews
- 30/04 – Six Sub-£160 Z77 Motherboards, Benchmarked And Reviewed
- 23/04 – Video Teaser: Intel's DZ77GA-70K Motherboard
- 17/04 – Overclocking: Asus Rampage IV Extreme Versus EVGA X79 FTW
- 08/04 – Intel’s Z77 Express And Lucidlogix MVP: New Features...
- 27/02 – Six £165-£215 LGA 2011 Motherboards, Reviewed
That more on the topic is annoying - Look ma nothing about the topic - just links to older stories that have nothing to do with the last 21 pages.
Mobos - Why so many fails? glad I've not reason to upgrade for a while.
"The floppy cable appears to be a thoughtful addition, except that the motherboard doesn’t have a floppy interface."
Hilarious!
Ive had some bad experiences with motherboards xD Next time I upgrade Im going straight for an Asus rampage or something incredibly expensive, its worth it
Interesting article. I made a good choice on purchasing an ASUS. I have the deluxe version of the p6t and it serves me well... I have noticed that the benchmark results for 3d mark vantage, Foxconn should be in first then EVGA.
Has AsRock gotten back to you (Tom's Hardware) on the x58 Super Computer overclocking failure's reason? I'm on my 2nd AsRock [after Conroe DVI 1333, x48 Twin Turbo Wi-Fi) both very good and has served me well for 1/3 of the price of 3 x failing Asus SEI & SEII and I was just about to go for the AsRock x58 Super Computer when I happen upon this review, so you can imagine I am very keen to know the reasons behind the catastrophic failures of this mobo.