Hard Drive Performance: H2benchw
03:50 - Tuesday 10 June 2008 by Thomas Soderstrom
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: x48, motherboard
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: x48, motherboard
Table of content:
Hard Drive Performance: H2benchw
Ad
We tested the third-party controller of each motherboard against the on-chipset RAID capability of the ICH9R, to see how each component performed. ASRock got left out, since it had no third-party SATA controller, while ECS was forced to run a single drive due to its single port.
Three of the motherboards tied for access times, while DFI’s implementation of the JMicron JMB363 somehow fell slightly behind.
Who would have thought that Marvell would take the lead away from JMicron in bandwidth? Intel’s solution finishes far ahead.
Intel’s solution reads the fastest…
…and writes the fastest, too.
- Previous page Synthetics
- Next page Hard Drive Performance: IOMeter
Ad
Google Ads
Ad
The Motherboards Articles and reviews
- X48 Motherboard Comparison, Part 2
- High-End Chipset Battle
- NFORCE 780a SLI Motherboards Compared
- AMD's Athlon Stepping Improvements
- AMD 780G Chipset- Full-HD Playback with a Sempron
- X48 Motherboard Comparison: Meet the new boss
- Intel Skulltrail II - Overclocking and Power Consumption
- Intel Skulltrail I - Feeling the Power of 8 Cores
- Intel Skulltrail III - Eight against Four Performance Comparison
- Ultimate Budget Overclocking Box - A 3.5 GHz Core 2 System with a...
News
Reviews
Related Content
Where is the Cost/Performance ratio.
I think ASrock have done well to put forward a competitive offering and I reckon they will be notably cheaper. I think they bring the enthusiam to the masses.
I personally would go for the Gigabyte or DFI board, because their builds are quality and could conceivably last for years.