Source: THG – Keywords: x38, comparison, DDR2
Categories: Hardware
Introduction
Intel’s P35 Express chipset is a tough act to follow, after setting records in both performance and overclocking capabilities. But like the P965 Express it replaced, the long-ago released FSB1333-compatible update was never intended to be an enthusiast part because it wasn’t designed for multiple graphics cards. Enthusiasts’ choices were restricted to older parts such as the 680i SLI, the ancient 975X or the ill-fated CrossFire Express 3200.
Intel’s not one to stand still, so how could it abandon the high-end market for so long? Part of the reason might be its former chipset alliance with graphics company ATI, which resulted in the CrossFire Express 3200 being developed under Intel’s blessing but not delivered until after CPU competitor AMD had bought ATI out from under the partnership. The chipset designed to replace the 975X in crossfire-equipped performance systems was thus abandoned by Intel and received little support from motherboard manufacturers.

After many months of waiting, Intel finally released its X38 Express to much fanfare, though we were a little sceptical about its role using current technology. The new parts would deliver on promises not filled by the CrossFire Express 3200 by supporting all the technology incorporated in the P35 Express, plus two full-bandwidth PCI-Express x16 slots, which have been further enhanced with next-generation PCI-Express 2.0 transfer-doubling capabilities.

The big hope of enthusiasts was that Intel might reach a licensing agreement with Nvidia for SLI driver support, as the technology has been physically supported by Intel’s chipsets since the early days of PCI-Express. This unfortunately wasn’t going to happen as it appears Nvidia simply can’t compete with Intel on the technology front in the chipset sector, and instead relies on the exclusiveness of "SLI compatibility" to maintain its meagre market share. This put Intel in the awkward position of supporting Crossfire instead, even though ATI is now a fully-owned subsidiary of CPU rival AMD. Had Nvidia caved on graphics drivers, Intel would have held all the cards in the dual-graphics chipset game; its components are electronically compatible with both technologies.
No story of such complexity can be detailed on one short webpage, but jumping ahead to the planned X38 release date brings use to a few more problems, most notably that Intel found a minor bug after production began. Revising the silicon after many motherboard manufacturers had already finalized design resulted in several weeks of delays as each company tried to tweak existing products to meet Intel’s new specifications. Most manufacturers needed to change the circuit board itself, and a few even cancelled production plans. Today we bring you the only three DDR2-compatible motherboards that could meet our latest deadline, and Part 2 will show what if any performance advantages DDR3 adds to the mix.
- Next page Asus Maximus Formula (Special...
Given that the only reason why anyone would ever buy a DDR2 X38 board rather than P35 is the potentially superior Crossfire performance, where are the Crossfire gaming numbers?
I like the foxconn combo DDR2/DDR3 board as it allows for future upgrade. But why do they offer 2xDDR3 slots 4XDDR2? It would be better the other way around as most current games are happy with 2 gig of ram but by the time DDR3 becomes a more reasonable option it may be 4 gig of ram will be required so you would have to use 2x2gb DDR3 modules. Trouble with that is that certainly with DDR2 the 2gb modules are of more limited availability and generally restricted to the mid range speeds.
DDR2 2gb are not limted, i had no problems getting them, i hate to have to buy DDR3 2gb sticks, ram companys are rakeing it in
Sorry Leexgx but that is not correct - there is far less choice of 2gb DDR2 modules than there is of 1gb modules and those that are available are in the mid range speed bracket and not the top performers.
I understand what you say about the price of DDR3 but my point was that they will come down in price and become a realistic option at which point it may be that 4gb of ram will be the required amount. It's just a pity that the combo boards in those circumstances would restrict you to buying 2gb modules which may have the same "problems" (for want of a better word) as the DDR2 series.
not very true nicoslab! I will get an x38-ddrII card and that for sure not because of crossfire support. I will use my 2 nvidia cards on it which do require 2 x16 (not as sli but for multiple displays)
No nVidia cards *require* PCIe x16. I have run two 8800s in a 975x board at x8, and in an ASrock 775-Dual-Vista at x4.
Not all 2GB DDR2 modules are slow, I'm running 4*2GB OCZ Reaper HPC modules at DDR2-800 4-4-4-15, not bad timings.