11:50 - Thursday 14 February 2008 by Patrick Schmid
Source: THG – Keywords: wolfdale, shrinks, transistors
Categories: Hardware
Source: THG – Keywords: wolfdale, shrinks, transistors
Categories: Hardware
Table of content:
Test Setup
Ad
| System Hardware | |
|---|---|
| AMD Platform AM2 | Asus M2N32-SLI Deluxe, Rev.1.03G |
| Nvidia Nforce 5 | NVIDIA nForce5, BIOS: 1001 (03/13/2007) |
| Intel Platform S775 | Gigabyte X38-DQ6, Rev. 1.0 |
| Intel X38 | Intel X38, BIOS: F7 (01/02/2007) |
| Intel Platform S775 | Gigabyte P35C-DS3R, Rev. 1.0 |
| Intel P35 | Intel P35, BIOS: F2o (05/11/2007) |
| Intel Platform S775 | Asus P5B Deluxe/WiFi-AP, Rev. 1.03 |
| Intel P965 | Intel 965P, BIOS: 1101 (04/04/2007) |
| Memory | 2x 1GB A-Data DDR2-1066+ Vitesta Extreme Edition |
| DVD-ROM | Samsung SH-D163A , SATA150 |
| Graphics Card | Foxconn Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX
GPU: 575 MHz Shader Clock: 1350 MHz Memory: 786 MB DDR4 (900 MHz, 384 Bit) |
| Sound Card | Creative Labs Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeGamer |
| Power Supply | Zalman, ATX 2.01, 510 Watt |
| System Software & Drivers | |
| Operating System | Windows Vista Enterprise Version 6.0 (Build 6000) |
| DirectX 10 | DirectX 10 (Vista default) |
| DirectX 9 | Version: April 2007 |
| Sound Driver | Vista Driver 2.13.0012 (15.03.2007) |
| Graphics Driver | Nvidia ForceWare Version 158.18 (32 Bit) WHQL |
| Chipset Driver | Version 8.1.1.1010 (21/11/2006)
Intel 631xESB/6321ESB/3100 Version: 8.3.0.1011 Intel 5400 Version: 8.5.0.1007 Intel 631xESB/6321ESB/3100 - SATA Version: 8.2.0.1011 Intel 631xESB/6321ESB/3100 - USB Version: 7.4.0.1005 |
| Storage Driver | Matrix-Storage Manager 7.0.0.1020 |
| Nvidia Chipset | nForce-Treiber: 15.00 (02.02.2007) WHQL |
| Java | Java Runtime Environment 6.0 Update 1 |
While our test system was based on DDR2-800 memory in an effort to fit our results in our Processor Charts, using DDR3-1333 memory would provide a small advantage. If you read our last DDR3 memory articles on DDR3-1333 and high-speed DDR3-1600/1800 RAM, you’ll remember that the benefit is indeed very small considering the premium prices that the modules command.
Benchmarks And Settings
| Benchmarks and Settings | |
|---|---|
| 3D-Games | |
| Warhammer Mark of Chaos | Version: 1.006.000
Video Mode: 1280x1024 Video Quality: game default Multiple CPU/Core Demo: THG Timedemo (1 minute) |
| Quake 4 | Version: 1.3 Final
Video Mode: 1280x1024 Video Quality: game default Benchmark I: THG Timedemo Benchmark II: playnettimedemo id_demo001 (official ID-Soft NetTimeDemo) |
| Unreal Tournament 2004 | Version: 3369
UMark: 2.0.0 Video Mode: 1280x1024 High Image Quality Bots: 16 Benchmark: AS-Junkyard |
| Serious Sam 2 | Version: 2.070
Video Mode: 1024x768 HDR Rendering: off Renderer: Direct3D Filtering mode: none Antialiasing mode: none Benchmark: Greendale |
| Supreme Commander | Version: 3.220
Video Mode: 1024x768 Video Quality: game default Vsync = off Benchmark: real 60 second game with real three computer physics |
| Prey | Version: 1.3
Video Mode: 1280x1024 Video Quality: game default Vsync = off Benchmark: THG-Demo |
| Audio | |
| iTunes 7.2 | Version: 7.1.1.5
Audio CD "Terminator II SE", 53 min High Quality (160 kbps) |
| Lame MP3 | Version 3.98 Beta 3 (05-22-2007)
Audio CD "Terminator II SE", 53 min wave to mp3 160 kbps |
| Video | |
| Pinnacle Studio 11 Plus | Version: 11.0.0.5082
Encoding and Transition Rendering Private MPEG2-Cam-Movie Video: 720 x 480 Pixel, NTSC, 6000 kb/sec Audio: MPEG Layer 2, 224 kb/sec 16 Bit, Stereo 48 kHz File Type: MPEG-2 (DVD Compatible) |
| TMPEG 4.2 | Version: 4.2.10.211
import file: Terminator 2 SE DVD (720x576, 16:9) 2 Minutes Dolby Digital, 48000 Hz, 6-Kanal, English Advanced Acoustic Engine MP3 Encoder (160 kbps) |
| DivX 6.6.1 | Version: 6.6.1
- Main Menu - Profile: Home Theater Profile (720 x 576) 1-pass, 780 kb/s - Codec Menu - Encoding mode: Insane Quality Enhanced multithreading |
| XviD 1.1.2 | Version: 1.1.2 (01/11/2006)
Target quantizer: 1.00 (maximum quality) |
| Clone DVD 2 | Version: 2.908
DVD "Terminator II SE" (English version) Transcoding from DVD-9 to DVD-4.7 Audio: English Dolby AC-3/6 (surround) - DTS Subtitle: no |
| Mainconcept H.264 Encoder | Version: 2.0
MPEG2 to MPEG2 (H.264) MainConcept H.264/AVC Codec 24 sec HDTV 1920x1080 (MPEG2) Audio: MPEG Layer 2 (48 kHz, 2 Channel, 16 Bit) Stream: Transport Codec: H.264 Mode: NTSC (29.97 FPS) Profile: High |
| Adobe Premiere Pro 2.0 HDTV | Version: 2.0 |
| Windows Media Encoder 9.1 AP HDTV | NTSC MPEG2-HDTV 1920x1080 (24 sec) |
| Windows Audio Encoder 10 Pro | Import: Mainconcept NTSC HDTV 1080i
Export: Adobe Media Encoder - Video - Windows Media Video 9 Advanced Profile Encoding Passes: one Bitrate Mode: Constant Frame: 1920x1080 Frame Rate: 29.97 Maximum Bitrate [kbps]: 2000 Image Quality: 50.00 - Audio - Windows Media Audio 10 Professional Encoding Passes: one Bitrate Mode: Constant Audio Format: 160 kbps, 44.1 kHz, 2 channel 16 bit (A/V) CBR |
| HD Playback (Blue Ray) | PowerDVD HD 7.3
Blue Ray Disc (James Bond - Casino Royale) Video Mode: 1920x1080p (full screen) Codec: H.264 |
| Applications | |
| Grisoft AVG Anti-Virus | Version: 7.5.467
Virus base: 269.6.1./776 Benchmark Scan: Vista Enterprise (Windows folder) 8 GB |
| WinRAR | Version 3.70 BETA 8
Compression = Best Dictionary = 4096 kB Benchmark: THG-Workload |
| Auodesk 3D Studio Max 9 | Version: 9.0
Rendering Dragon picture rendering HTDV 1920x1080 |
| Maxon Cinema 4D Release 10 | Version: 10.008
Rendering from a scene "Water drop at a Rose" Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - 8Bit (50 frames) |
| Adobe Photoshop CS 3 | Version: 10.0x20070321
Filtering a 69 MB TIF-Photo Benchmark: Tom’s Hardware-Benchmark V1.0.0.4 Programmed by Tom’s Hardware using Delphi 2006 Filers: Crosshatch Glass Sumi-e Accented Edges Angled Strokes Sprayed Strokes |
| Adobe Acrobat 7 Professional | Version: 7.0.9
Settings: High Quality Print Compatibility: Acrobat 8 (PDF 1.7) Security: High (128-bit RC4) |
| Microsoft Powerpoint 2007 | Version: 2007
PPT to PDF Powerpoint Document (115 Pages) Adobe PDF-Printer |
| Deep Fritz 10 | Version: Nov 16 2006 |
| Synthetic | |
| 3DMark06 | Version: 1.10
1280x1024 - 32 bit Graphics and CPU Default Benchmark |
| PCMark05 Pro | Version: 1.2.0
CPU and Memory Tests Windows Media Player 10.00.00.3646 Windows Media Encoder 9.00.00.2980 |
| SiSoftware Sandra XI SP1c | Version 2007.5.11.40
CPU Test = CPU Arithmetic / MultiMedia Memory Test = Bandwidth Benchmark |
- Previous page Core 2 Duo E8000 Series
- Next page Absolute Benchmark Results
Ad
Google Ads
Ad
The CPU Articles and reviews
- Intel Skulltrail II - Overclocking and Power Consumption
- Intel Skulltrail I - Feeling the Power of 8 Cores
- Intel Skulltrail III - Eight against Four Performance Comparison
- Comparing AMD CPU Efficiency
- AMD Phenom 9600 Black Edition – A New Hope?
- Phenom vs. Athlon Core Scaling Compared
- Intel Power Consumption Then and Now
- The Phenom vs. Athlon Core Shootout
- Ultimate Budget Overclocking Box - A 3.5 GHz Core 2 System with a...
- Yorkfield at 5 GHz with Water Cooling?
News
Related Content
"While the top model, the Core 2 Extreme QX9650, which is based on four processing cores, was already launched in late 2006" isn't that meant to be 2007?
I'd say transistor count rather than size
I still maintain that AMD is not so bad - in this article you are effectively comparing a Ferrari and a Porsche; both are fast products.
Does it matter whether you drive a Ferrari to go to the corner store? Most people would say no, because all that most people want to do is get from A-to-B as cheaply as possible. And that is where AMD fits in.
People are too quick to slate AMD..without the A64 there would be no C2D/C2Q. And still, the A64 which is a generation behind C2D, can still compete. The 6000+ puts in a stirling effort.
These 45nm parts are good devices, but they lack a dedicated bus interconnect and of course, they lack a memory controller. Even with these things I would not buy Intel because historically they have always lagged behind in terms of innovation (and some would say, fair play). Phenom does need work, and hopefully AMD can address this, but I think the only reason you're suddenly seeing half-decent products from Intel is because it has had to. Right up until recently AMD has been a fierce competitor. In certain, bandwidth-intensive applications AMD still has the lead.
Deep Power Down might not always make sense in a desktop environment, where more applications and services are active than on the desktop.