Windows 7 Versus XP: Which Belongs On Your Netbook?
Table of contents
- 1. Windows 7 On The Horizon
- 2. Test Hardware And Notes
With Windows Vista having never received more than a lukewarm reception (at best), many eyes are now turned towards Redmond in anticipation of Microsoft’s next OS. The company says it has learned from its mistakes and promises to do better this time around with Windows 7. Since it will come pre-installed on most new desktop PCs and notebooks once it is released later this year, Windows 7 will inevitably gain a certain installation base. The situation was different when Windows Vista was released, as many users chose to stick with Windows XP for the time being. That won’t be as much of an option this time, since most companies no longer offer XP. Of course, manually downgrading will still be possible if you have an installation disc and a valid license. On the other hand, Windows 7 is generally being seen in a much more favorable light than Vista anyway. It looks like a lot of users may give Microsoft the benefit of the doubt.
But what about the netbook space? So far, this class of mobile computing device relies on either Linux or Windows XP as its operating system. Considering that the latter was released over eight years ago, it’s understandable that many users are looking for a more modern version of Windows to run on their mobile computing companions. Although it’s possible to install and run Vista on a netbook, we've tried it and it’s not exactly a fun experience, with the system feeling sluggish and overburdened. Besides, most netbooks only come with 1 GB of RAM, which is decidedly too little for memory-hungry Vista.
In May, Microsoft opened the doors to its Release Candidate 1 of Windows 7, allowing users to download the preview and take it for a spin. Of course, the software giant is hoping to establish a firm foothold in the netbook market with its newest version of Windows, promising that Windows 7 will run much more smoothly on the lightweight hardware than its predecessor. Naturally, that piqued our interest. How would Microsoft’s newest OS fare on a current netbook? What’s the everyday user experience like? And, of course, what do the benchmarks say about performance compared to Windows XP?
- Acer,
- Consumer Electronics,
- windows ,
- 7 ,
- xp
Latest Software News
- 10/02 – Diablo 3 Won't Be Anywhere in Sight Until at Least Q2 2012
- 10/02 – Microsoft Promises "Fair and Reasonable" Patent...
- 09/02 – Loads of Skyrim Mods Already on Steam Workshop
- 09/02 – Chrome 17 With Web Page Prerendering Now for Download
- 08/02 – Windows 8 Consumer Preview on Feb 29, Claims Invitation
Latest Software reviews
- 17/01 – In Pictures: Dear Developers, 15 Games Worthy Of A Sequel
- 09/01 – Nokia Lumia 710 Review: Windows Phone 7 On A Budget
- 06/01 – Web Browser Grand Prix VIII: Chrome 16, Firefox 9, And Mac OS X
- 06/12 – Star Wars: The Old Republic: PC Performance, Benchmarked
- 11/11 – Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim: PC Performance, Benchmarked
Considering xp is almost 9 years, i would expect to see a huge increase. Hopefully the new service packs for 7 will increase speed rapidly.
@conzo92
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH ROFL. LOL
ooooo uuhhhhh.
Sure, increase speed in bloated OS rapidly with more bloat. Thats a good one. They can blame the drivers all they want but it is simply that there is more overheads required to run winbloat 7. With such limited resources on a netbook it will never beat XP, EVER. The article is just paid for marketing hype crap. Oh look it applies some filters faster in win7 on an app that will NEVER be used on a netbook. Clutching at straws
I can't believe how irrelevant this site has become.
Now lets compare a high performance PC, lets say icore7 920, 6GB ram,2 Velociraptor HD in Raid 0.
That will be very interesting to compare and analyse.
Only MS dreams of using Win7 on a net book.
I use Win 7 64bit everyday with Photoshop 64 and Lightroom and there is no way I go back to XP
It's good to get tested benchmarks for these things so there are some real stats, so thanks for that. But I have to say you seem almost to be writing almost as apologists for MS here. OK maybe you are just glass-half-full in attitude, but come on, the performance of Vista and this version of Windows7 is PATHETIC! As far as I can see, 7 should be released at best as a free patch for Vista (people are paying for both these OS's!!) and then the whole sorry adventure should be abolished. In 9 years hardware performance has increased by a huge amount. In the same time all MS can manage is to push out bloated gimmicky and downright frustrating monsters of OS's that cannot even match the performance of XP!! How low can our expectations of MS go?? What have they got to show for 9 years of development and all that improved hardware platform? NOTHING! I watched the video on the Windows 7 site with the two guys talking about what's new in this OS - it's embarrasing! There's just nothing to recommend it.
I'm not surprised the battery life tests are worse, because as far as I'm aware power-management optimisations tend to be one of the last things done (at least looking at linux drivers). As for the rest, isn't it a bit early to say?
I disagree with americanbrian: more features and updates don't have to mean more bloat. Besides, I'm sure XP has enough of it's own bloat, so allowing new features doesn't necessarily have to make it worse.
But anyway, isn't the point for most people "is windows 7 efficient enough to work on a netbook, without any big slowdowns?", not "which OS is actually faster?"
Btw tomshardware, it'd be useful to see how much RAM each OS leaves available, with no applications running and possibly when doing some common tasks (provided you confirm the applications running use roughly the same amount of memory on each platform).
Just so no-one thinks I'm an MS fan-boy, I wouldn't dream of doing most of my work on anything other than linux.
Hopefully the new service packs for 7 will increase speed rapidly. ANYONE READ THAT!!!!
Call me old fashioned, but I like my OS to be there to run my applications and hardware in the fastest, most efficient and most stable way. That's about it really. My applications should have as close to full use of my system resources as possible and allow me to do the work I want to do. My OS should keep out of the way. I just wish MS would release a version of Windows for users who don't want loads of gadgets and gimmicks and flowery UIs that try to run your life for you, one which is stripped down to the bare essentials out of the box. It's typical of MS to get completely lost in their own sense of importance and think that Windows is the be all and end all of having a computer. Basic things like actually improving performance and software compatibility seem to be a long way down the list of importance, below ripping off UI ideas from Apple.
slowman09, sorry for the thumbs down, meant to click conzo, but missed. I agree with you wholeheartedly.
Isn't it sad that despite ALL the benchmarks going XP's way they still don't outright recommend it? The filter rubbish is just marketing crap. They don't even list which filters. They even say some go XP's way and other Win7 but then only show Win7 doing "better".
patronizing or what.
I'll be dual booting between Windows 7 and Windows XP (32-bit) on my mini-notebook for a long time me thinks :-)
Bob
Yes, an OS should never be a system resource hog (hello Vista)
If I want to use a 'feature', the system should only run it when asked, not start a gazillion of services 'just in case' I happen to click on something
I use an Advent 4211C netbook and the first thing I did to it was remove XP from it (and all the preinstalled junk that came with it) and put Windows 7 on. It boots in less than a minute and runs very smoothly. Yeah so what it only got like 2.5 in the computer test thingy in the control panel? Does what I need to do, and very well I might add.
XP has nowhere near the 'plug n play' driver support that Windows 7 has; and for netbooks with no CD drive etc, you need those drivers straight off the bat and Windows 7 did everything for me. Score.
Ummm, Windows XP has 3 service packs, Windows 7 is only an unfinished RC, that works really nicely
Let's try again after the first release before we get all excited like.