eSATA/FireWire/USB 2.0: G-Technology G-Drive 1TB
G-Technology is a Hitachi brand as well, but this product aims at the Mac market, although it can be reformatted from HFS+ to NTFS or FAT for Windows PCs. While the SimpleDrive is a consumer product, the G-Drive is called a professional external hard drive, designed for "storage-intensive applications." This becomes obvious by the interface choice--you can connect the G-Drive via USB 2.0, FireWire 400, or FireWire 800. Or use eSATA with a 3 Gb/s data transfer speed.
The design is much more ostentatious than the SimpleDrive III. Everything is made of brushed aluminum, which serves as a heat sink as well. There is also a fan integrated to ensure cooling at all times. G-Technology ships the drive with all four different data cables included, as well as a product CD with a few utilities. There is no backup software for this product. But we find this makes sense, since the G-Drive is a performance product rather than a backup or archive drive. The device weighs 1.2 kg (plus power supply and cables), which is a bit more than what the SimpleDrive III weighs. A three-year warranty is standard as well.
The G-Technology Web site lists eSATA performance of up to 113 MB/s, while our maximum throughput using HD Tach 3.01 was only 93.5 MB/s. This result can still be considered "fast enough"--and roughly three times better than what you can get with USB 2.0.
We also tested FireWire performance at 400 and at 800 Mb/s connection speeds and observed a maximum throughput of 76.8 MB/s with FireWire 800 and 40.1 MB/s with FireWire 400. Write speeds are considerably slower with FireWire interfaces and USB 2.0, but we found that eSATA can maintain roughly the same throughput level for reads and writes.
However, our tests reveal that the drive’s throughput can actually be higher, depending on the file sizes of the data you transfer. With eSATA, large files can be read at 108 MB/s while performance for photos and MP3 files is roughly 80 MB/s for read operations. Writes seem to benefit from caching, as we measured 99.6 MB/s when writing large DVD video files and more than 125 MB/s for photos or MP3 files. Since these file types typically fit into the 32MB buffer, this could explain the high-performance numbers. In any case, the G-Drive’s throughput starts at where the SimpleDrive III stops. But the performance comes at a price: you have to fork out $200 for this 1TB drive while the 2TB SimpleDrive III costs roughly the same. Stepping up to a 2TB G-Drive will cost you $349.
- Storage,
- Business Storage,
- usb ,
- firewire ,
- esata
Latest External Storage News
- 09/02 – Laser Heat Used to Make HDD Write Transfers Faster
- 02/02 – Seagate Quietly Intros GoFlex Thunderbolt Adapter
- 02/02 – Seagate Believes HDD Supply Disruption to Continue in 2012
- 28/01 – Cleversafe Announces 10 Exabyte Storage System Configuration
- 26/01 – Western Digital Intros My Book Thunderbolt Duo Drive
Latest External Storage reviews
- 10/11 – Round-Up: 15 microSDHC Cards, Benchmarked And Reviewed
- 25/05 – Qnap TS-559 Pro+: Familiar Network Storage With A New CPU
- 24/05 – 10 SDXC/SDHC Memory Cards, Rounded Up And Benchmarked
- 18/05 – Is Data Encryption Worth Destroying Your NAS' Performance?
- 26/04 – Nine USB 3.0 Flash Drives For Road Warriors



"The first costs roughly $200 while the fast-and-flexible drive is as expensive at $199..."
messing with my head? ;-D
How come no USB3 comparisons? There are USB3 HDD's & Motherboards out there.
Geesh... for $20 I got an external case from newbegg, which supports USB2 and eSata + $60-70 for a 1TB drive = kills every product you've listed for under HALF the price. It's aluminum, barely gets above warm-to-touch, completely silent and it's all black. Thus it looks better than fake alum-O-plastic and the ugly, Mac OWC-Mercury copy-cat case.
How anyone could justify spending so much for so little; beyond us all. Would be nice if you guys could review a whole slew of bare, EXTERNAL cases. Nobody is going to spend $200 for what they could get for $100 or LESS, like I did... Newbs will that is, but then again they don't come to Tom's; that's what CNET reviews are for lol.
yeah, cnet is for noobs i must say! how do they perform, benchmarks speeds? nah. just simple : style points, weight points and other worthless stuff!!