Benchmark Results: Access Time And I/O Performance
Access times are very close to what we’re familiar with on bare drives. It appears that the USB 3.0 interface doesn’t introduce much latency.
The I/O performance results show what could happen if many concurrent users or programs access your USB 3.0 drive.
2
Comments
Read more
Sponsored
Latest External Storage News
- 09/02 – Laser Heat Used to Make HDD Write Transfers Faster
- 02/02 – Seagate Quietly Intros GoFlex Thunderbolt Adapter
- 02/02 – Seagate Believes HDD Supply Disruption to Continue in 2012
- 28/01 – Cleversafe Announces 10 Exabyte Storage System Configuration
- 26/01 – Western Digital Intros My Book Thunderbolt Duo Drive
Latest External Storage reviews
- 10/11 – Round-Up: 15 microSDHC Cards, Benchmarked And Reviewed
- 25/05 – Qnap TS-559 Pro+: Familiar Network Storage With A New CPU
- 24/05 – 10 SDXC/SDHC Memory Cards, Rounded Up And Benchmarked
- 18/05 – Is Data Encryption Worth Destroying Your NAS' Performance?
- 26/04 – Nine USB 3.0 Flash Drives For Road Warriors
Be warned - I got the WD usb 3 a couple of months ago and was warned that if anything goes wrong your data is pretty much gone as the HD and housing are a bespoke design. Looking at the usb connector (also a WD only design)on the housing I felt it looked a little flimsy... guess what happened last week? When moving the HD the female USB socket connection inside the housing broke and came out when I took out the USB cable. Had to have the entire thing shipped back to WD to be repaired - they said they couldn't reattach it and that I had mishandled it. End of story lost all my data and now out of pocket for one very expensive HD :-( If you get one be very careful moving it when the cables are plugged in, its size, weight, need for separate power and flimsy connectors mean that it probably not the best 'portable' HD. Performance wise when transferring large continuous files (ISOs etc) it was bloody fast, but for folders with lots of smaller files the speed dropped dramatically as can been seen in the test results. So now looking for a replacement, will have to go back to the article to pick the best alternative.