Interface Bandwidth
02:50 - Monday 5 March 2007 by Patrick Schmid
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: understanding, hard, drive, performance, uk
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: understanding, hard, drive, performance, uk
Table of content:
Interface Bandwidth
Ad
As expected, Serial ATA has a huge bandwidth advantage over UltraATA. Yet the differences are irrelevant in everyday life, as the drives do not hit the bandwidth bottleneck of UltraATA/100, which clearly is 85 MB/s in case of the 7200.10. SATA/300 may send almost 200 MB/s over the wires, but this only reflects the performance at which data is retrieved from a drive's cache memory, not the platters themselves.


Access Time
These are obvious results: the drives with the most capacity waste had the quickest access times, as the read/write heads have a shorter operating range due to the unused inner storage areas. However, we did not observe this tendency within the UltraATA drives, where access times seem to be slightly longer across the product line.


- Previous page Data Transfer Rates
- Next page Application Performance
Ad
Google Ads
Ad
The Internal Storage Articles and reviews
- 2007 HDD Rundown: Can High Capacities Meet High Performance?
- PCI Express SATA RAID Controllers For SMB Servers
- PC Hard Drives That Pack More Power for Less Cash
- 2.5" Hard Drives by Toshiba and Western Digital Rev Up
- 15 Years Of Hard Drive History: Capacities Outran Performance
- Addonics CardBus Adapter: Bringing eSATA to Notebooks
- Vasstek's 'Quasi' RAID 6153S
- The CalDigit S2VR Duo RAID Enclosure
- The CalDigit S2VR Duo RAID Enclosure
- IcyDock's MB559 Happily Marries eSATA and USB 2.0
News
Reviews
Forum
Related Content