Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

Creating Linux Partitions

by

Step 4 of 7, Part B

As with the space allocated to page files in Windows, everyone has a different opinion about what the proper size of the swap area should be. However, for the sake of simplicity, we will make a swap area that is equal to the amount of RAM in your system. If you have 512 MB of RAM, your swap partition should be 512 MB. If you have 4 GB of RAM, your swap partition should be 4 GB. Whether the partition is primary or logical depends on how many operating systems you plan on putting on this drive. The maximum number of primary partitions is four per drive. While there are some gains to be had by placing your swap area in either the beginning or end of a drive, it is largely dependent on individual hard drive specifications. So, for the sake of simplicity, we will create the swap area in the beginning of the disk. When all options except "Mount point" are filled, click OK.

The next partition we need to create is the root ( / ) partition. Select the entry marked "free space" and then click "New partition." Since the root partition will contain all mount points except /home, we should give it some space. The minimum for the root partition ( / ) is 4 GB and this will be sufficient if most of your activities and applications are online. However, if you plan on installing numerous or large applications, then you'll want to give / more space (how much is up to you). I advise giving the root partition an amount of space of between 10 GB and 30 GB, depending on how much you have to spare. It truly doesn't matter if / is created in the beginning or end of a drive. Once again, for simplicity's sake, create it in the beginning of the drive. Unlike Windows, Ubuntu system files can be installed on a logical partition. Use the "Ext3 journaling file system" for this partition. When finished, click OK.

The final partition that we will create is for your home folder (/home). Once again, select the entry marked "free space" and then click "New partition." Because /home is where your documents, music catalog, movie collection, picture albums, and any other files that you want to keep locally will be stored, it should use whatever free space you have left. The /home folder can be set to either the beginning or end of the drive with no difference between the two. This partition does not need to be primary, but I highly recommended that you make /home on a primary partition. Use the "Ext3 journaling file system" for this partition. When finished, click OK.

Any empty drive to which you have added swap, root, and home partitions should look something like this:

A drive with Windows to which you have added swap, root, and home partitions should look something like this:

This is the last chance you will have to back out before committing these changes to your partition table.

Now that the partitions have been created, click Forward to continue with the installation.

Share:
10
Comments
Read more
X
Submit

Comments
Read the comments on the forums
Anonymous 22/05/2009 20:10
Hide
-0+

If you forget your username, you are plain stupid. But it is not an issue. Boot up in safe mode/recovery mode or whatever. Once at the recovery mode screen, choose to start terminal as root. You can type "ls /home" to list users. You're username will be there.
Type "passwd yourusername" hit enter and type in your new password type. Remember it this time dummy. Confirm it by typing again. Remember linux is case sensitive.
You've succesfully changed your password and recovered your username. Type "exit" funnily enough and boot into Ubuntu.
You win!!!

Micropat 22/05/2009 20:34
Hide
-1+

I tried out Ubuntu Ibex (dual boot with vista) for a little while a couple of months back. It was simple to install and I loved the GNOME desktop but I found that some of the software I installed didn't work and my wireless wouldn't work. I searched a lot on line (wired access of course) but every suggestion I tried didn't solve my issues. Since I loved the GNOME desktop so much though I recently tried out FEDORA 10. It's working perfectly for me (only had it a week but used it a lot already). I haven't booted to vista since bar once just to check that I can actually dual boot. I'll probably use Fed for my work and vista only for my games when I'm bored with my PS3.

Anonymous 23/05/2009 02:39
Hide
-0+

I love Linux, I've been using it since my college days (actually, I needed it, along with Unix, for engineering work). I think it's a bit complicated for the average Joe that just does not know any better than to point and click, especially if you have to play with it in the cli and the actual inner workings of the OS. Linux has come a long way but it still needs to polish some rough edges associated with the OS. Some of these issues are not the OS fault for example gaming, proprietary drivers, patent ridden codecs, etc. I hate it when I have problems with my video card drivers (yeah ATI), I hate it when a printer is just not supported (yeah Lexmark). Anyways, Linux is in the way up and I think this (rough edges) is going to change soon. I will continue to use Linux for a long time, heck I never actually used Windows ME or XP as my primary OS, Linux was my primary OS before that (Debian 2.0 rings a bell, ha)

will_chellam 23/05/2009 18:03
Hide
-0+

Other people may well disagree, but the last time i tried ubuntu (8.04) It took me over 30hours to get my wifi card working, and that's depsite fllowing letter for letter guides written by other people.

I wouldnt mind but I consider myself extremely knowledgeable most of the time I used to install fairly complex multi-server networks, and the card that wouldnt work is a netgear wpn311 - not even an uncommon model.

Windows - literally plug and play, less than 5 minute job including shutdown and reboot, clearly linux has a way to go before it is acceptable for everyone.

smartroad 23/05/2009 18:11
Hide
-0+

I want to love Linux, I really do, but overall Windows makes things easier. In this day and age we shouldn't need to go to a CLI, I haven't really done that in anger since I used my old BBC Micro. I hate the fact that when I finally figure out how to get one of the many different package types to finally install, I then can't find where the program has actually gone. At least with Windows you say exactly where the program is to reside. Lets be honest, most people don't care about /usr /home /var etc etc. Outside of the Linux (UNIX?) world it means nothing and adds nothing but confusion. OK it does make sure everything is in its place but it also adds complexity. If I want to install a program on Windows I double click the install program and off it goes, installs and then adds a shortcut to the start menu. Simple. Windows even now asks for authorisation before running an executable. It isn't perfect, nor as secure as the Linux way, but a darn site easier. As I said, I want to love Linux, I want it to be easy to use and simple from an average users perspective. I love computers, always have, but I like using them, not fudging around 'under the hood' when I just want to install a simple program. Until that day I am resigned to using Windows with all the risks that go with that :(

Anonymous 24/05/2009 13:59
Hide
-0+

What people generally confuse themselves with regards to drivers is that it's not a Linux issue. The problem is with the manufacturers of the hardware. They restrict themselves to creating windows only drivers, which means the Linux community have a hard time trying to reverse engineer those drivers to make one that will work with Linux. If the manufacturers of hardware were to release Linux drivers then these issues would simply disappear.

So for those people with misconceptions about problems with hardware and drivers, think for a second where did your windows driver come from?

People fail to realise that drivers under Linux for the vast majority have been painstakingly created from little or no knowledge of the underlying hardware. For the drivers that do work flawlessly and lets come on and admit it there is a lot of them now, hats off to the dedicated developer community for persevering.

Don't get me wrong I love Windows XP, and before that Windows 98/se but I have used linux for over 5 years and the progress these developers have made is truly amazing. I am no Linux fan boy, I have been using a Mac for more than 2 years now but have other machines that run a gamut of OS's.

Anonymous 25/05/2009 12:32
Hide
-1+

smartroad, the thing is, if you want to install something in ubuntu, you can do it with a gui too. Just go to System, then Administration (I don't really know the english version of it, so I might as well be wrong), and then click synaptic. Then, you will be able to search, select and install/update whatever packages are listed on your repositories. If you want to have all your applications to be in a specific location, then you should compile from source. That won't be as easy and will require a cli, unless someone writes a script for it.

But I don't think we should be afraid of cli, there are many thing you can do a lot faster in a terminal than using a gui. There are gui tools for just about everything you will need using linux, it's just that using the cli is faster and easier on experienced users, that's why we are trying to teach the cli to newcomers.

LePhuronn 25/05/2009 17:30
Hide
-0+

I'll switch to Linux when Adobe release their software on it.

smartroad 28/05/2009 11:51
Hide
-0+

kthxbai

I have now actually switched to UNR on my NC10 and to be fair it is a much better experiance then I was expecting. There are a few nags I have, unlike windows it doesn't simply switch to my external monitor when I plug it in, for one thing. But on the whole it is a much better and easier experience then when I first used SUSE linux back in '98 :)

Anonymous 08/06/2009 21:45
Hide
-0+

I also want to love Linux, and the only reason I still stick with Windows, is its ample game support... but that is not Linux's fault, off course...
~ Mortov Molotov

Best offers

Newsletters


OK