Data Safety Vs. Performance
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: the, storage, champions
Data Safety Vs. Performance
While RAID setups for servers are created to protect data against hardware failure, home users primarily focus on the possible performance gain. While a RAID 3 or RAID 5 setup provides excellent fault-tolerance together with pretty fast transfer rates and access, it is quite expensive to implement: first, you require at least three SCSI hard drives (usually, 5 or 6 are used). Second, these types of controllers are some the most expensive hardware you can buy.
The high price in itself explains why RAID modes 3 and 5 have not been accepted in the mass market. Home users usually won't buy half a dozen hard drives and a $500 controller merely for the purpose of speeding up their disk subsystem. Instead, RAID 0 and 1 have become the popular modes that the majority of users implement.
As you will see later, using a four-drive instead of a two-drive stripeset does not increase transfer performance by much, but this makes sure that the minimum transfer speeds remain impressively high throughout the whole medium.
On-Board RAID Vs. PCI Cards
There are several motherboards available that come with an additional IDE controller, usually an IDE RAID chip. Most of them are HighPoint chips, some are Promise chips and very few are AMI's controllers (e.g. IWill). The main reason why such controllers are integrated directly onto motherboards? Price. On-board RAID gives motherboards an excellent added-value feature while not adding much to the overall board price tag.
PCI IDE RAID controllers start at approximately $60. Retail kits such as the ones we tested from AMI and Promise are more expensive, but they come with two 80-pin IDE cables, comprehensive manuals and sometimes additonal management software or other add-ons.
Software Or Hardware RAID?
A few weeks ago, we touched upon the topic of software RAID, using the RAID capabilities of Microsoft Windows 2000 as an example. On the one hand, a software array is more flexible, as you can use almost every drive that is accessible by Windows. On the other hand rescuing the data can be more problematic if either Windows 2000 or one of the drives crashes - so the data safety issue is something that you should think about twice. Here's the link to our Software RAID article:
RAID Without Additional Hardware: Do It Yourself With Windows 2000
- Previous page The Storage Champions: IDE Hardware...
- Next page AMI / LSI Logic MegaRAID IDE 100
- Real Gentlemen: Budget IDE Hard Drives
- Western Digital WD1000BB - Taking Grand Prize!
- Real Gentlemen: Performance IDE Hard Drives
- Storage Giant: Seagate's Barracuda 180
- Mobile 2.5 Hard Drive Systems: MD2-USB and MD2-FW1 from DataFab
- We Have a Winner - Seagate's 'Cheetah X15'
- Ready for CeBIT: Fujitsu, Maxtor and Quantum's latest...
- A Look At SCSI-Performance: Fujitsu MAJ3364MC U160-SCSI
- New IDE Hard Drives at 20 GB per Platter: Fujitsu MPG3409 and...
- SCSI Lives! Quantum Atlas 10K II
-
The password does not meet the
-
the last letter of the alpherbet
-
pirates of the caribbean the siren
-
the lamest of the lame game
-
The night we got the bird
-
storage
-
Network Storage
-
playtv external storage
-
Switching Storage Controllers Without Reinstalling Windows
-
the sims 2
-
do i set up the bios
-
alone in the dark
-
reset the CMOs
-
The 500 Gaming PC
-
Check the temperature
-
testing the tech s
-
There is no disc in the