The Sapphire Radeon HD 2600 XT ULTIMATE

As far as the raw hardware specifications go, the Sapphire 2600 XT "ultimate" is functionally identical to the Powercolor version, which runs at the same clocks and provides the same performance. However, the "ultimate" edition comes with a few perks.


First of all, the card is passively cooled, and is therefore completely silent. This is a great feature, especially for video cards used in a home theater PC where silence is paramount.
To further its home-theatre aspirations, the 2600 XT comes with HD component video output in addition to the HDMI option. Many early HDTVs don’t have HDMI yet, so this is a plus for folks with this setup. Of course, there is also the DVI-to-HDMI converter, and like its Powercolor cousin the Sapphire, it also comes equipped with a built-in sound processor for the HDMI output.
However, what I really liked was the bundled software and games. Sapphire’s Ultimate card comes with PowerDVD 7; a full version of 3dMark 06; and Valve’s "Black Box," including the triple bonus of Half Life 2: Episode 2 and Team Fortress 2. (These games are not yet available by the way, but Valve lets you play Day of Defeat in their stead until the release date).
Of course, the ultimate edition will likely cost more than the $100 2600 XTs out there today, but the game bundle is very attractive. Definitely worth looking into the price difference - assuming these 2600 XTs perform up to par. Let’s see what the benchmarks have to say about that!
- Previous page The Powercolor Radeon HD 2600 XT
- Next page Test Setup & Methodology
- The Best Gaming Video Cards for your Money: A September 2007 Guide
- The Revolution Will Not be Televised - HD Video on PC
- How Cool Are Thermalright's Graphics Card Coolers?
- The Best Gaming Video Cards for the Money UK: August 2007
- Leadtek's GeForce 8800 Performance Leviathan
- HD 2600 & GeForce 8600: Where's the Mid-Range?
- San Base: Computer Graphics Avant-Garde
- The Best Gaming Video Cards for the Money: July 2007
- The Best Gaming Video Cards for the Money: June 2007
- The Best Gaming Video Cards for the Money: May 2007
-
2600XT
-
The password does not meet the
-
pirates of the caribbean the siren
-
the lamest of the lame game
-
The night we got the bird
-
the last letter of the alpherbet
-
the sims 2
-
There is no disc in the
-
the best cpu
-
alone in the dark
-
testing the tech s
-
reset the CMOs
-
The 500 Gaming PC
-
Check the temperature
-
do i set up the bios
-
what is the best mb for
-
The NEC Multisync 20WMGX2
How much more performance inprovement would it be sensable to expect from the drivers and partner overclocking?
Would it say get to the point where it would be viable for those with 7600gt and x1650xt cards to change over to these new "midrange cards" ?
Mactronix
Ive just upgraded from HD2600XT's (DDR4) in Crossfire mode and their performance as a single card solution were poor to say the least but very good in Crossfire (equal to that of HD2900XT/PRO on 3DMark06 - around 9,000-10,000 with 5000+ AMD)... but if you're upgrading from a 7600GT or X1650XT then I very much doubt there'll be much difference apart from the HD benefits. These cards are hugely limiting themselves with the 128-bit bus and it shows at high res's... maybe wait for the next wave of midrange cards to be released that could have 256-bit memory bus.