Game Benchmarks – First Person Shooters, Continued : System Builder Marathon: Price Vs. Perf.

Tom's Hardware > Articles & reviews > System Builder Marathon: Price Vs. Perf.

Game Benchmarks – First Person Shooters, Continued

08:00 - Tuesday 8 July 2008 by Don Woligroski
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: system, builder, marathon

Table of content:

Game Benchmarks – First Person Shooters, Continued

system builder marathon

Crysis shows us that all of these systems can handle 1920x1200, although the sub-$1,000 machine can only handle an average of 40 frames per second when overclocked.

system builder marathon

With 4xAA enabled, only the sub-$4,000 system can really handle 1280x1024 very smoothly. The sub-$2,000 system can only achieve an average 40 frames per second at 1024x768, and the sub-$1,000 system can not achieve an average 40 frames per second at any resolution.

7 – Game Benchmarks – First Person...
1. 1 – Introduction
2. 2 – Synthetic Benchmarks
3. 3 – Application Benchmarks – Media Encoding
4. 4 – 2D and 3D Rendering
5. 5 – Application Benchmarks – Productivity
6. 6 – Game Benchmarks – First Person Shooters
7. 7 – Game Benchmarks – First Person Shooters, Continued
8. 8 – Game Benchmarks – Real Time Strategy
9. 9 – Benchmark Summary Analysis
10. 10 – Value Analysis
11. 11 – Conclusion
Previous page Game Benchmarks – First Person Shooters
Next page Game Benchmarks – Real Time Strategy

Print
Send to a friend
Comment
Content also available in:

Talkback

Show comments: By default All Good ratings Poor ratings

Solitaire 09/07/2008 02:49

Hide

Mmm, so everyone who's going to overclock their PC has a gaming-quality 24" LCD? No? So why didn't you focus on 1680*1050 if you're going to even bother including the sub-$1000 system in the comparison? That's the standard resolution of high-end 17" and most mainstream screens under 22" (even some cheap 22" as well)

Google Ads

The Build Your Own Articles and reviews

News

Reviews