Overclocking the Sub-$4000 PC

Ad

Here’s a quick reminder of our $4000 PC component list and prices.

June 2008 SBM High-End PC Component Cost
CPU Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 1050
CPU Cooler Swiftech H20-120 Compact Cooler Kit 140
Swiftech MCR220 2x120mm Radiator 36
Silverstone RADSUPPORT09 13
Swiftech Chrome 3/8-Inch Fittings, 2-pack 5
Swiftech Plastic Hose Clamps, 4-pack 6
2x Swiftech 3/8-Inch Neoprene Tubing Packs 26
2x Scythe S-Flex SFF21E 120mm Fan 30
Motherboard Asus Striker II Extreme 450
RAM Patriot Extreme Performance DDR3-1333 - 4GB 315
Graphics 2x Gigabyte GeForce 9800 GX2 GV-NX98X1GHI-B 1040
Hard Drive Samsung Spinpoint F1 HD753LJ (750GB) x2 240
Sound ASUS Xonar DX 7.1 90
Case Silverstone Temjin TJ09BW 250
Power Coolermaster RS850-EMBA 850W 180
DVD-RW Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology SH-203B 30
Auxiliary Fan Antec SpotCool Motherboard Cooling Fan 15
Floppy Drive NEC 1.44MB Floppy Drive 9
Total Price $3925

Inspired by our previous 4.35GHz overclock using the same Intel Core 2 Duo QX9650 processor, we wondered how much farther the newer nForce 790i SLI of Asus’ Striker II Extreme could take us. Our March marathon had after all relied on the 780i SLI equipped Striker II Formula, and everyone knows that the 780i is nothing more than an aging 680i with a PCI Express 2.0 hub attached. Surely the knew chipset would have a positive effect.

Changes to this month’s $4,000 build were the motherboard, memory, audio card, graphics, and hard drive. Of these only the motherboard could limit CPU overclocking, because the memory speed can be decreased far below its frequency limit and the other components are supposed to be on fixed-frequency busses. We used the same 1.45V core voltage limit to aid in system longevity, along with the same 1.50V front side bus and Northbridge voltages. We also slowed the memory well below its rated speed for initial CPU stability tests, raising it only after finding the CPU limit. These precautions yielded the following maximum speed.

That’s right, our processor’s maximum stable limit was a whopping 193 MHz lower when using the 790i-equipped Striker II Extreme than it had been when using the 780i-equpped Striker II formula. Could this spell trouble for nVidia’s latest chipset? Our upcoming 790i Motherboard Comparison should provide some answers.

A lower overclock simply adds to the disappointment we already felt about the new configuration after our 9800 GX2 SLI pair proved less capable on average than an ancient pair of 8800 GTX’, but at least the new motherboard offers the bandwidth advantage of DDR3.

NVidia’s recent chipsets offer a limited number of “linked” memory ratios and numerous “unlinked” speeds, allowing virtually any stable front side bus frequency to work with nearly any memory. We’ve seen memory performance drop dramatically using some “unlinked” speeds, so we selected an FSB and CPU multiplier to provide the highest stable memory speed at our 4.16 GHz CPU limit.

Patriot Memory’s Extreme Performance PDC34G1333LLK PC3-10666 4 GB dual-channel kit was picked for its low price rather than overclocking performance, yet it was still stable at DDR3-1400 using its DDR3-1333 rated 7-7-7-20 timings.

Finally, it was time to overclock our graphics cards. Though our March $4000 PC was sorely lacking in GPU overclocking capability, the new cards were much more compliant.

A few hours of adjustments and stability tests brought us to the resulting 720 MHz GPU, 1750 MHz shader, and 1080 MHz RAM clock. We might have gotten slightly more from these cards had we the time to test them in smaller 1-2 MHz increments, but we feel comfortable that this was sufficiently near the actual limit to provide scores representative of a longer effort.


  • Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment
  • Content also available in:
Ad
Talkback
Be the first to comment on this review!

Note You are going to post a comment as anonymous.



Google Ads
Ad
The Tweaking & Tuning Articles and reviews