Overclocking the Sub-$1000 PC

Ad

Our $1000 build used a low-cost processor, but the system was made to handle a significant overclock without breaking the bank. Here’s the price list, before rebates.

June 2008 SBM $1,000 PC Component Cost
CPU Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 130
CPU Cooler Cooler Master HyperTX 2 26
Motherboard MSI P7N SLI Platinum 150
RAM Crucial Ballistix 2x 1GB PC2-6400 Kit 55
Graphics 2x Gigabyte 8800 GT GV-NX88T512HPV1 (SLI) 376
Hard Drive Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 500GB ST3500630AS 80
Sound Onboard 8-Channel HD Audio Codec 00
Case Cooler Master Centurion 590 RC-590-KKN1-GP 70
Power Silverstone ST400 400W 47
DVD-RW Sony NEC Optiarc 7170 Serial ATA 25
Auxiliary Fan 2x OKGEAR D12SL-12 (120mm/1350RPM) 9
Total Price $968

These prices have been adjusted to reflect the cost at the beginning of this marathon’s publication last week, but the parts were ordered at the end of May. That means we couldn’t order components that didn’t exist in the market yet, and the price at the time of our order was $998.

A decline in total system price of $30 doesn’t seem that large, but our components also came with $100 in rebates. Why didn’t we include the rebates in our price list? Because when you’re buying a system on a fixed budget, you can’t wait for the rebates to clear on some parts before ordering the remainder!

A 45 nm process Wolfdale core clocked all the way down to 2.53 GHz with half its cache disabled, the low-cost Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 gave us high hopes for overclocking. But then we were confronted by an unpleasant surprise: Regardless of which multiplier we used, the MSI P7N SLI Platinum couldn’t push this FSB-1066 based E7200 beyond FSB-1333. Heavy hearted, we were forced to settle on a final clock speed at the processor’s maximum multiplier of 3.16 GHz.

At least we wouldn’t need a large voltage adjustment to get to this speed, as the system was perfectly stable at a BIOS setting of 1.23 volts.

With a limited number of “linked” multipliers available to nVidia chipsets, we picked a 1000 MHz data rate and found Crucial’s Ballistix DDR2-800 modules to be perfectly happy to run this speed at lower-than-rated 4-4-4-8 timings and 2.10 volts.

We tried overclocking the graphics cards as well, but when NVidia nTune reported the wrong default frequency to lab technician Shelton Romhanyi, he inadvertently overclocked to an “underclocked” frequency. Fortunately, further testing showed no noticeable performance difference from adjusting nTune’s GPU and shader clocks, so at least the performance hadn’t gone down. While nTune appears ineffective for controlling the graphics processor on Gigabyte’s custom-designed card, a graphics memory speed increase from 1840 to 2050 MHz data rate appeared to work.


  • Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment
  • Content also available in:
Ad
Talkback
Be the first to comment on this review!

Note You are going to post a comment as anonymous.



Google Ads
Ad
The Tweaking & Tuning Articles and reviews