Best SSDs For The Money: April 2012

Best SSDs: Entry-level

Best SSD for ~£40: Boot Drive

Corsair Nova 2

Corsair Nova 2
30 GB
Sequential Read
280 MB/s
Sequential Write250 MB/s
Power Consumption (Active)
1.3 W
Power Consumption (Idle)0.2 W

Since the beginning of our Best SSD For The Money series, Kingston's 16 GB S100 monopolized our most entry-level SSD position. Things are changing this month, though, as vendors try to unload their first-gen SandForce-based models. It costs almost as much to manufacture drives based on the controller company's second-gen hardware, which is significantly faster. The result of this phase-out is creating a few really good deals, and that's why we're switching over to Corsair's 30 GB Nova 2.

Although the Nova 2 gets our recommendation, we have to caution you about Corsair's specs. Sequential write performance for this 30 GB drive is overstated at 250 MB/s. The company provides a single performance number for all of its capacities, but we know that's not accurate. Actual write performance should max out closer to 100 MB/s or so.

The speed of a low-capacity SSD might not compare well to larger models, but it's still going to be significantly better than installing your operating system on a hard drive. Our previously-recommended 16 GB Kingston S100 only worked as a Windows 7 32-bit boot drive due to the OS' space requirements. Windows 7 64-bit requires 20 GB, so shifting up to 30 GB gives you a little more freedom. There's not enough space to install much else; however, if you manually manage your space, booting from a low-capacity SSD can significantly improve system responsiveness.

Best SSD for ~£60: Boot Drive

OCZ Agility 3

OCZ Agility 3
60 GB
Sequential Read
525 MB/s
Sequential Write475 MB/s
Power Consumption (Active)
2.7 W
Power Consumption (Idle)1.5 W

According to Ten 60 GB SandForce-Based Boot Drives, Rounded-Up, comparing the out-of-box performance of entry-level drives based on the company's second-gen controller reveals very few differences.

What we do know, however, is that synchronous NAND enables slightly better numbers than asynchronous memory in certain situations. Because it does, in fact, employ asynchronous NAND, OCZ's Agility 3 isn't the fastest model available. But when it's priced at £60, you do get a reasonable amount of capacity for operating system files and a handful of critical apps. Moreover, OCZ's SandForce-based SSD does well with regard to power efficiency, too. So, it's getting our recommendation this month.

Best SSD for ~£85: System Drive

Kingston SSDNow V200+

Kingston SSDNow V200+
90 GB
Sequential Read
535 MB/s
Sequential Write480 MB/s
Power Consumption (Active)
3.23 W
Power Consumption (Idle)0.57 W

Many of us find it inconvenient to manually track where apps and data reside across multiple drives. Higher-capacity SSDs cost more, but they also offer the freedom to worry less about where stuff goes, and to simply enjoy the speed and responsiveness of flash-based storage. We consider 90 and 96 GB drives the baseline for installing an operating system and all of your important apps without getting excessively expensive. From there, user data goes on a larger and more cost-effective magnetic disk.

Kingston seems to agree, which is why its 96 GB SSDs have been such a success. Other vendors sell products at a similar capacity point, but among the 90 GB SSDs leveraging SandForce's second-gen technology, the V200+ impresses us with the lowest price tag.

Create a new thread in the UK Article comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
    Your comment
  • still too expensive by any standard.

    Stick with HDD,
  • r u mad blud
  • Why didn't Intel 520 make the cut?
  • If I start to think about it a SSD would come in handy. I have managed with a 250GB HDD and about 60% of it is music, bigger downloads and movies. But on the other hand I doubt an ASUS Eee PC 1201PN is worth the upgrade.