Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Best SSDs For The Money: November 2014

Best SSDs For The Money: November 2014

This month brings a long overdue update to our best SSD list. We say goodbye to older 64GB-class models, portable drives and USB keys, cut down our number of picks, and implemented a far more concise article format that focuses on internal SATA SSDs.

As CPU performance hits new and unforeseen heights, processors increasingly spend time waiting on data from hard drives. This is what makes storage today's most glaring bottleneck, and overcoming it requires an SSD. At the end of the day, the real-world differences between SSDs in a desktop environment aren't altogether very large. The most noticeable performance increase occurs when you go from a hard disk to just about any solid state drive.

There are measurable attributes that separate one SSD from another. But you'll need to approach a purchasing decision as the sum of many parts. Within individual apps, you'll hardly notice the difference between most SATA 3Gb/s and faster SATA 6Gb/s drives. It's the more taxing workloads that make a faster device worth owning.

So, if you don’t have the time to read the benchmarks, or if you don’t feel confident enough in your ability to pick the right drive, fear not. Every month, we publish a simple list of the best SSDs for the money across the full spectrum of capacities.

November 2014 Updates

A quick look at the big table below reveals two companies dominating our picks for November. Crucial comes in strong with its MX100 value-oriented SSD, while the Samsung 850 Pro continues to exert itself as the performance leader. 

The pricing on the Crucial MX100 is compelling. SSDs are still a long ways from the per-gigabyte cost of hard drives, but it's easy to snag a smaller SSD boot drive when you're looking at 256GB of space for just over £75. Additionally, Crucial includes power loss protection and hardware encryption to sweeten the deal, plus drive imaging software from Acronis.

Too bad the company didn't come out with a 1TB version of the MX100. Then again, at these prices, you could simply pick up two MX100 512GB SSDs and run them in RAID 0. Yeah…it's time to get a little creative. In that 1TB SSD class, we added Crucial's M550 1TB in as our budget-oriented buy.

As for the Samsung’s foray into V-NAND, the 850 Pro’s performance excellence easily keeps it in place as our top pick for 2.5" SSDs. Alongside its speed, we also note that when it comes to power management, the 850 Pro surpasses its competition in our DevSlp (device sleep) testing, making Samsung's flagship a probable favorite for mobile users.

For this month’s recommendations, we're also including the 840 EVO in its mSATA form. We covered that drive earlier this year, and not much has changed aside from a recent firmware update that addresses a drop in performance over time.

Add a comment
Ask a Category Expert
React To This Article

Create a new thread in the UK Article comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 6 comments.
  • 0 Hide
    Adela Pop , 21 March 2014 10:48
    Great overview! It seems that Samsung is getting more and more attention and I think it deserves it. I would definitely prefer Samsung 840 Evo over Crucial M500. It´s true that the differences in performance are not huge between the two, but overall Samsung 840 Evo seems more reliable and it has lower power consumption:
  • 0 Hide
    dickh81 , 27 March 2014 19:25
    Intenso also makes a 256 SSD drive. I wonder why that is not on your list.
  • 0 Hide
    nowasus , 22 April 2014 14:07
    I would rather see the "best of..." in a category that considers function instead of price. That way, the user may select proper utility (performance) vs his budget. For example if I am a win7pro64 user with general computer home usage, what would be my best bet for a system SSD to support various amateur level functions (media, graphics, office) with a traditional SSD with AF capabiliy.

    This way I could better choose my price range.
  • 0 Hide
    goozaymunanos , 22 April 2014 14:39
    i'll take a 512GB Sansung SSD over a 480GB Crucial for £10 extra all day and night.
  • 0 Hide
    Plusthinking Iq , 19 May 2014 22:14
    samsung makes the worst ssd when you look at the big endurance test. just goggle it ppl. have very bad experiece with samung products and must implore that no one buy the brand, phones, tv and ssd. its like sony, circling the drain.
  • 0 Hide
    asianteekay , 9 July 2014 14:06
    samsung makes the worst ssd when you look at the big endurance test. just goggle it ppl. have very bad experiece with samung products and must implore that no one buy the brand, phones, tv and ssd. its like sony, circling the drain.

    Being a large all encompassing company has both advantages and disadvantages being that it can leverage its own in-house supplies for components and technologies. And bulk discounts and special order specifics chips. I suspect these SSD have little to no provisioning and there for more likely to fail than compared say a Crucial (512GB 840 Evo v. 480 M550) That's really no reason not to boycott their display panels used in TVs and monitors. Much like Sony does very well in audio but not so well in the PC market.
React To This Article