Walton Chaintech Apogee 64 GB
Apogee is Walton Chaintech’s brand for memory modules, and it is now also used for flash SSDs. The Apogee SSDs are available at 32, 64 and 128 GB capacity points, and are based on either MLC or SLC flash memory. We received a 64 GB 2.5” MLC model, which is the reason for the poor write performance. We measured up to 111 MB/s on reads, but as little as 27 MB/s on writes—that’s only a fraction of the 149 to 89 MB/s promised on the Walton Chaintech website, and it’s even less than what USB 2.0 can support. Chaintech says that the SLC versions are faster, stating 163 MB/s for reads and up to 142 MB/s for writes. We are skeptical, upon looking at the results for our MLC-based sample.
However, the 0.68 W to 1.8 W power consumption is very acceptable, and the drive comes with a second interface: you can also connect it via USB 2.0. This is the main reason why we included it in this little roundup, as it can either be used as a system drive, or as a portable storage device. Thanks to its low power consumption, the device runs on USB power. Its weight of 86 g is approximately 15% less than what a conventional 2.5” hard drive would weigh.
USB 2.0 Performance
SATA or USB 2.0: The Mini USB port lets you hook up this drive to a plethora of possible hosts. All you need is a suitable Mini USB to USB cable (which isn’t included with the drive).
We looked at the Apogee SSD as a multi-purpose flash SSD, rather than as a drive that would serve as a system drive. For example, you could use it in a hot swap bay as a fast drive for your personal files on your PC. In this case, you would, of course, utilize the fast SATA interface, which provides up to 111 MB/s of throughput, as mentioned above. Whenever you need to travel, you could remove the drive, and hook it up to your notebook or other PCs using the USB interface.
We talk about the Apogee's SATA performance in our most recent flash SSD roundup and focus on the USB performance here. The drive reads at approximately 30 MB/s, which is what we’d expect, but it only writes at approximately 15 MB/s when using USB 2.0. Flash-based SSDs can definitely do much better than this.
Walton Chaintech ships the Apogee Flash SSD SATA II in this nice black box.
The bottom side holds the product label.
Latest Storage Solutions News
- 02/02 – Seagate Quietly Intros GoFlex Thunderbolt Adapter
- 02/02 – Seagate Believes HDD Supply Disruption to Continue in 2012
- 01/02 – Other World Computing (OWC) Reveals Two New SSDs
- 28/01 – Cleversafe Announces 10 Exabyte Storage System Configuration
- 26/01 – The 15 Winners of the "Explain a Samsung SSD" Contest
Latest Storage Solutions reviews
- 27/01 – What Does One Petabyte Of Storage (And $500K) Look Like?
- 20/10 – Does The USB 3.0 Controller On Your Motherboard Matter?
- 21/10 – Storage Specialist Starline Interviewed on Business HDDs
- 26/08 – Not All USB 3.0 Implementations Are Created Equal
- 23/04 – Memory Cards, Part 2: SDHC Cards From 8GB To 16GB





I wanted an article with the tiny HDD used as the image on the homepage.
mee too
yup, tiny hdd where is the info!
big fail to use that picture and not even mention the frigging hdd, that was what I wanted to read about
Well what can you say.

They lift articles directly form the American site and don't change spelling or prices.
Then when they actually get the finger out to make a new article for the UK they can't get it right.
Yet another reason Tom's should have a UK based office for the site, like every other country it does articles for.
It's becoming like shoutwire this place, sad times
Tom's used to be GREAT, it was the place to go, but for the last year+ it's gone down the drain, half done articles, US prices instead of UK prices.
If they're gonna use an unrelated picture why not use a picture of some tits while they're at it?
You will have to wait - Tom's only show tits at Xmas! Nice women though!
I'd go with tits with two of those tiny hdds for nipples. Maybe there's another QOTD "news" article suggestion?
WHy would they use a picture of Devastator_UK tho?
SO what we are all saying is
This site is not as good as it used to be; but so long as there is soft-core porn mixed into the hardware review some where, we will all be happy.
HOWEVER, due to the crapness of the site in recent times, the girls used should be extremely good looking to address the balance.
Browser boob babe being a good example. We need CPU babe, GPU babe, HDD, bade, Mobo babe. Monitor babe will need huge eyes and Case babe (should be a butch lass).
All those in favour say "aye"
It's not a tiny hard drive. It's a regular 3.5 demonstrated by a giant you fools!