Source: THG – Keywords: serial, RAID, controller
Categories: Hardware
SAS Vs. SATA

Can you tell them apart? The upper connectors are SATA (individual connectors), while the lower one belongs to a Seagate Savvio SAS drive, carrying the continuous connector for data and power.
Both SAS and SATA are based on full-duplex, switched serial point-to-point connections, which means that there is no need to manually assign device IDs or to terminate the connections, and data can be sent and received simultaneously. SAS and SATA also facilitate device hot-plugging. Speeding up parallel protocols such as Ultra320 SCSI either required a wider bus, which requires more wires, or faster clock speeds, which causes problems with signal delays. Serial point-to-point interconnects, however, can simply be bundled. SAS makes use of this technological principle, combining multiple SAS connects to hook up to external appliances.
Mechanically, there is only one difference between SAS and SATA: while both use the same pinout for data and power connections, the two connectors are physically separated for SATA. For SAS, the two connector segments were merged, which makes it possible to attach a SAS drive to a SATA controller using the continuous connector, but you cannot hook up a SAS hard drive to a SATA controller using the SATA connector (SFF 8482). Running SATA on a SAS controller is possible because the Serial ATA protocol is less complex and simply is tunnelled into SAS while being transferred. Thanks to the wide, unified SAS connector, the physical connection happens to be much more solid and cannot fall off accidentally. The main reason for these two connectors being slightly different is the extended feature set of SAS, which you don’t find with SATA controllers: SAS supports dual port connections to attach hard drives redundantly (a must-have for high-end applications), and it supports so-called expanders to fan out storage devices like how a network switch runs multiple clients.
Performance wise, there is not much of a difference between the two interfaces. Serial ATA 2.5 provides a maximum bandwidth of 3 Gbit/s per port, using an 8/10 bit encoding, which results in a 2.4 Gbit/s or 300 MB/s bandwidth that can be used for actual data. The same applies for SAS, and the roadmap provides a road to 6 and 12 Gbit/s, resulting in 600 MB/s and 1,200 MB/s bandwidth per port.

SAS on the left, SATA on the right hand side.

The Mini SAS 4i connector is used (SFF-8087) to create so-called SAS wide ports, which typically consist of four SAS connections.
- Previous page Unified Serial Controllers Do SAS And...
- Next page Drive Trends: 2.5-inch Moving In
- RAID Scaling Charts, Part 2
- Enthusiast 2.5-inch HDDs: Speed or Capacity?
- Should You Care About Hybrid Hard Drives?
- The Raid Migration Adventure
- Record-Making Hard Disk: 750 GB Caviar Posts 95 MB/s
- RAID Scaling Charts, Part 1
- WD Brings 250 GB HDDs to Notebooks
- 1.8" Hard Drives Hit 100 GB
- The Spring Hard Drive Guide
- GFI Launches Online Storage Device Scanner
- HP ML150 G2 Server & HP T700 UPS Causes Excessive CPU Usage
- Q: HP Vectra VL 6/350 -- maximum size hard disk?
- will a 200gb hd work in Compaq S4020WM ?
- Gateway 700x / OEM Specs Question
- Anyone have experience with Western Digital's 10,000 RPM d..
- PC starts on it's own!
- P5E-VM HDMI compatibility with Debian
- Whoppix 2.7 looks cool, but having problems utilizing it!!
- Chaintech 9CJS BIOS and hard drive
- USB controller flagged in Device Manager
SATA is _NOT_ full duplex, it's half duplex!
and I contest that you sir are not full duplex, but half duplex!
The RC5252-08 Card is awesome. Alot of bang for the buck. This Ciprico group has a grip on a new kind of RAID! Great support too.