As you probably already know, Sandy Bridge dramatically alters the way enthusiasts can approach overclocking. For a great many, the days of wringing massive gains out of a scalable architecture like Nehalem are over. Options do still exist, though.
The back-story is already pretty well known. In an effort to simplify its design (which really does make sense from an engineering perspective), Intel integrated the clock generator into the 6-series chipsets. Now, one clock affects the entire system, meaning you can’t independently set the frequencies of various subsystems like PCI Express and the DMI.
Unfortunately, PCI Express doesn’t like to operate very far outside of its specification, so any significant deviation beyond the new 100 MHz BCLK causes problems. Though there’s generally a few percentage points worth of wiggle room, the days of taking Nehalem’s 133 MHz BCLK up to 200+ MHz are history. Overclockers are basically losing one of the two variables that previously affected processor performance. Intel addresses this in two ways.
First, it carries over the unlocked K-series that first surfaced back in May of last year. These parts top out at a 57x ratio multiplier, enabling frequencies of up to 5.7 GHz without touching the BCLK. Intel says the 57x is largely a “design consideration,” whatever that means. The good news for the LN2 crowd is that the company is working on a BIOS that’ll go higher and apply to today’s CPUs. The K-series chips also offer "unlocked" DDR3 memory ratios, which aren't literally unlocked, but rather exposed up to DDR3-2133 (higher than most kits are capable of going anyway). Power and current limits can also be custom-specified, too.
There are only two K-series parts at launch: the Core i7-2600K and the Core i5-2500K. The unlocked i7 costs $23 more than the partially-unlocked version of the same chip, while the i5 runs $11 more expensive than its less-flexible equivalent. When you consider that, at its default settings, the Core i5-2500K runs at 3.3 GHz and Turbo Boosts up to 3.7 GHz, compared to the Core i5-760 at 2.8 GHz, an unlocked Sandy Bridge chip for $11 extra is actually pretty damn sexy.
If you don’t buy a K-series chip and instead grab a Core i7-2600, Core i5-2500, -2400, or -2300 (along with a P67-based motherboard), you’ll still have access to “limited unlocking.” This basically means you can set clock rates up to four speed bins above the highest Turbo Boost frequency setting available at any given level of processor activity.
So, take a Core i7-2600 as an example. The chip’s base clock is 3.3 GHz. With four cores active, it gets one bin worth of additional performance—3.4 GHz. Four bins above that would be 3.8 GHz. With two cores active, Turbo Boost bumps it up two bins, to 3.5 GHz. Limited overclocking makes 3.9 GHz available in that case. In a best-case scenario, only one core is active. Turbo Boost adds four bins of frequency, yielding 3.7 GHz, and Intel’s overclocking scheme lets you run at up to 4.1 GHz.
Anyone with a K-series CPU overclocking on air is going to be in good shape. Thomas and I both have Core i7-2600Ks that’ll do 4.7 GHz at 1.35 V all day long. More mainstream folks with non-K i5s and i7s will at least have an extra 400 MHz to milk from their chips. It’s the value-oriented buyers with processor budgets between $100 and $150 (where AMD offers some of its best deals) who get screwed. The only two Sandy Bridge-based options under $175 are the Core i3-2100 and -2120 at 3.1 and 3.3 GHz, respectively. No Turbo, no BCLK option, no limited unlock—those chips are quite literally stuck.
As with the integrated graphics situation, I think that Intel missed the boat by trying to use overclocking as a differentiating feature. The guys who hit 7 GHz+ in our recent K-series overclocking contest are getting artificially capped. The folks buying at the bottom end of the mainstream stack can’t touch their BCLK or multiplier settings. And unless you buy one of two K-series SKUs, you’re on a Turbo Boost + 400 MHz leash.
Hopefully AMD is taking notes. Though most of its newest 45 nm processors don’t offer a ton of headroom, sticking 32 nm manufacturing later this year could make flexible Bulldozer-based CPUs very attractive to anyone who feels like Intel is muscling them out of overclocking at the high- and low-end.
- Core i7-2600K, Core i5-2500K, Core i5-2400, And Core i3-2100 Reviewed
- Inside Of Sandy Bridge: Cores And Cache
- The System Agent And Turbo Boost 2.0
- Sandy Bridge’s Secret Weapon: Quick Sync
- Quick Sync Vs. APP Vs. CUDA
- Blu-ray Playback And Video Performance
- HD Graphics On The Desktop: Intel Trips Up
- Two New Platforms, More On The Way
- Overclocking: Sandy Bridge Changes The Game
- Meet Intel’s Second-Gen Core CPUs
- Hardware Setup
- Benchmark Results: PCMark Vantage
- Benchmark Results: 3DMark11
- Benchmark Results: SiSoftware Sandra 2011
- Benchmark Results: Content Creation
- Benchmark Results: Productivity
- Benchmark Results: Media Encoding
- Benchmark Results: Metro 2033 (DX11)
- Benchmark Results: F1 2010 (DX11)
- Benchmark Results: Aliens Vs. Predator (DX11)
- Benchmark Results: Power Consumption