Samsung's S27B971D is a refreshed flagship 27-inch QHD monitor selling for less than last-gen's model. It certainly looks impressive on paper, with its factory calibration and internal look-up table capability. Does it measure up in our lab, though
A little more than a year ago, I wrote VP2770-LED Vs. S27B970D: 27" Monitors At 2560x1440, reviewing Samsung's flagship S27B970D at £800. It offered high-end luxury, slick styling, a large feature set, and factory calibration. After a handful of tweaks and a price reduction (for the U.S. at least, we don't yet know how much the display costs in the UK), the follow-up S27B971D is ready for our suite of display tests.
QHD monitors, with a native resolution of 2560x1440, are becoming more commonplace on enthusiast desktops, despite the fact that they still start north of £400. There are a few grey-market exceptions (for example, Auria's EQ276W remains). At the other end of the spectrum, a few manufacturers distance themselves from the pack by adding features and improving performance at a correspondingly higher price point. Atop the price ladder sits the Samsung S27B971D.

Any display selling for close to needs to offer lots of pixels, a long feature set, or, preferably, both. Top-end performance goes without saying. The only other screen we’ve tested that includes a factory calibration is Asus’ PA279Q, which also boasts a CMS and selectable colour gamuts. The PA279Q sells for around £700. So, we want to know how Samsung justifies the extra cash.
| Brand | Samsung |
|---|---|
| Model | S27B971D |
| MSRP | (UK price not known) |
| Panel Type | PLS |
| Backlight | W-LED, edge array |
| Screen Size | 27-inch |
| Max Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| Max Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 |
| Response Time (GTG) | 5 ms |
| Brightness (cd/m2) | 300 High Bright, 220 Standard |
| Speakers | Yes |
| VGA | - |
| DVI | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1 |
| HDMI | 1 |
| Audio In | via HDMI or DP |
| Headphone | - |
| USB | 1 up, 2 down |
| Panel Dimensions W x H x D w/base | 25.4 x 18.4-22.3 x 9.7 in 645 x 467-567 x 247 mm |
| Panel Thickness | .9 in / 23 mm |
| Weight | 16.5 lbs / 7.5 kg |
| Warranty | Three years |
On paper, the S27B971D's specifications don't necessarily explain why the display is so expensive (the last generation model is £800). It’s not terribly bright, nor does it have the higher refresh rate that would make it attractive to gamers. What we can see is that it's aimed squarely at graphics professionals. Samsung touts factory calibration and out-of-box accuracy as the main selling points. And there's one feature it offers that no other company does: the ability to interface a calibration instrument directly with the monitor’s internal look-up table.
We’ve discussed LUTs in the past. This is best way to add functionality to a monitor’s OSD so you can arrive at a more precise calibration than would be possible otherwise. Samsung eliminates the need to add expensive software and pattern sources to your graphics toolkit. Its application, Natural Color Expert, is included in the package, along with support for all meters commonly in use today like the X-Rite i1Pro and Display2 products. Not only does this software address the usual calibration parameters, but it adds screen uniformity correction to the mix.
During the course of today's review, we'll run through NCE’s entire process. You'll also see us calibrate using more conventional steps. Samsung isn't a company we know to cut corners; however, our tests will show whether it comes up short in any particular metric to achieve that price reduction.
- Samsung S27B971D: High-End Luxury At A High-end Price
- Packaging, Physical Layout, And Accessories
- OSD Setup And Calibrating Samsung's S27B971D
- Calibrating The S27B971D With Natural Color Expert
- Measurement And Calibration Methodology: How We Test
- Results: Brightness And Contrast
- Results: Grayscale Tracking And Gamma Response
- Results: Colour Gamut And Performance
- Results: Viewing Angles And Uniformity
- Results: Pixel Response And Input Lag
- New Monitor, New Price: Is The S27B971D A Better Value?
Create a new thread in the UK Article comments forum about this subject
-
0 HideDrejeck , 23 February 2014 21:10None of the 27" and above Full HD resolutions monitor compete with the kind of Benq 2420T and Asus VG248QE. If you care of gaming, Hz, input lag and responsiveness are all you need to care. Color quality and fidelity is nothing. Otherwise if you need to work on pictures you need the best fidelity available and responsiveness and input lag are worth nothing.I really don't see the point in going to higher resolutions with an extreme effort from current graphics cards. There's always some guy thinking bigger is better. That's why some ended up playing on TVs and having the most painful responsiveness and baddest pixel quality on earth (not to mention ghosting and other artifacts).