Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

Power, Heat, And Efficiency

by

We manually set a 133 MHz base clock with all power-saving features enabled during both our benchmark and power consumption tests. MSI wins big here with power consumption numbers that are close to those we’ve seen on less-overclockable products.

MSI makes a lot of noise about its Icy Choke design, but this is the first time we’ve seen it produce noticeably lower voltage regulator temperatures. This alone could explain the XPower’s lower power consumption.

A quick comparison of the total performance for today’s three motherboards shows a difference of only 1.25%, even though the clock speed difference between the top and bottom boards was only around 0.4%

Dividing average performance by average power consumption could get ugly:

MSI leads by a huge margin, a fact that should excite efficiency fans, such as our own Patrick Schmid.

Share:
3
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
Read the comments on the forums
mi1ez 20/07/2010 11:34
Hide
-0+

I didn't see prices listed anywhere - the UD9 is $700!

silverblue 24/07/2010 12:18
Hide
-0+

I don't see the point in comment moderation if the same guy is posting the same sales scam crap over the course of 2 1/2 days and still hasn't been banned. If only he'd insulted a hardware company or something.

rebus_forever 08/08/2010 18:54
Hide
-0+

lol comments, as this is a site full of techys im surprised some sort id solution hasnt been put in place

Best offers

Newsletters


OK