Rambus case challenges current IPR rules
Amy Zuckerman of the Electronic News writes that the ongoing Rambus cases highlight deeper problems in the rules governing Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). As the patent infringement cases filed by Rambus against memory makers have developed, the question at the heart of the issue has been the viability of the standards process, particularly the rules that govern IPR in committees of the Joint Electronic Device Engineering Council (JEDEC).
Electronic News asked a series of standards experts about the current system, eliciting a range of answers. While some consider the system broken in need of systemic overhaul, other warn that isolated incidents in a generally successful system should not be used to invite governments to take over the standards process.
In a related article, the New York Times covers Software pioneer David Winer's warnings that Microsoft Corp. is using the standards process to lock developers into its system to the end that Web programs will be compatible only with Microsoft's version of the Internet.
Read the JEDEC article at electronicnews.com. The Microsoft article is at nyt.yahoo.
- Motorola to make 0.13 micron PowerPCs
- Sony upgrades Japanese PS2
- MP3.com jurors misplace decimal
- Intel makes storage standard open source
- AMD commits to 64-bit Linux
- NEC to drop consumer desktops biz?
- Breakthrough may double satellite bandwidth
- Ricoh, Metricom to announce wireless camera
- Galileo global positioning network on track
- AMD/Intel price cuts coming (still)
- US Hyundai Electronics group now "Hynix America"
- X-class flare knocks out E. Hemisphere radio
- Windows XP lacks USB 2.0 support
- Crypto experts laud US Gov't adoption of AES
- EU approves digital copyright rules
- HP, SGI, and Sun rush FTP security patches
- Intel to cut P4 prices up to 60 percent
- Judge warns of Rambus embarrassment




