Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Radeon HD 7990 Vs. GeForce GTX 690: The Crowd Picks A Winner

Radeon HD 7990 Vs. GeForce GTX 690: The Crowd Picks A Winner
By

Tom's Hardware enlists the help of /r/Bakersfield, plus some of its Facebook community, to test AMD's Radeon HD 7990 with the latest Catalyst 13.8 beta driver against GeForce GTX 690. The all-day event turned up some interesting observations.

Let’s say that you’re buying a new car tomorrow. It’s your first car, and you don’t know what to get. You have one friend who swears by Fords, but only because the company didn’t take any bailout money, you suspect. That sort of fanaticism doesn’t help you—you’re going to actually be driving this thing. You want a recommendation based on performance, mileage, reliability, and not some random factoid that ignites misplaced loyalty.

What’s better, then: one recommendation or several corroborating opinions from folks with no skin in the game?

Yeah, that’s an easy one. But when you hop on a forum and ask, “Which graphics card should I buy, AMD’s Radeon HD 7970 or Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 770?” get ready for an epic war of words, often waged by folks who don’t own either one.

This is why sites like Tom’s Hardware exist. We’re the guys who put in the hours to figure out whether A is faster than B. Almost exclusively, the recommendations we make are based on data generated in the lab. That information is conveyed to you in the form of benchmark results. But when it comes to multi-GPU graphics card configurations…well, we all know how complicated the story can get.

Does Radeon HD 7990 Redeem Itself?

Yesterday, Don Woligroski published his look at AMD’s Catalyst 13.8 beta driver, which adds frame pacing support. The purpose of frame pacing, as many of you already know, is to measure the rate at which frames are being rendered and deliver them in a more consistent cadence, rather than allowing each of the card’s two GPUs to simply output them as quickly as possible.

Don’s piece took our conventional data-driven approach. He used video capture and the FCAT tool set to analyze the output of AMD’s Radeon HD 7990 before and after Catalyst 13.8, compared to Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 690. He measured average frame rate, charted frame rate over time, and frame time latency.

What we hoped to see from AMD’s work was fewer dropped and runt frames. In fact, we were looking for frames to show up on-screen for about as long as the ones before and after them. Using the image below as an example, the red bars are more desirable than the black, despite the fact that both average 24 FPS. For more on this concept of consistent frame delivery, check out this page.

According to the numbers Don generated, Catalyst 13.8 beta does notably reduce the variance between individual frames, indicating that the Radeon HD 7990 performs more consistently with frame pacing enabled. However, Don’s videos also sometimes contradicted the outcome of FCAT, appearing choppy when the analysis tool suggested otherwise.

Tom's Hardware's PC Gaming Challenge: Radeon HD 7990 Vs. GeForce GTX 690

You'll have to excuse the video and audio quality; it's both loud and dark inside the brewery, and I didn't take my wireless mics with me.

Crowdsourcing Benchmark Data

Rather than drawing a definitive conclusion from the FCAT data or videos, we planned an event that’d run concurrent with Don’s testing. This event would bring in volunteers who’d play on two identically-configured platforms for a few minutes per game in popular titles. After switching from A to B, they’d jot down their preference and explain why the system they picked was the favorite. We’d collate the data and look for patterns in the subjective testing compared to Don’s benchmark numbers.

After such an inconclusive report yesterday, could we even hope to definitively answer whether AMD’s Catalyst 13.8 beta driver improves gaming on the Radeon HD 7990? Does it fare any differently against Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 690? That’s exactly what we hoped to figure out.

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the UK Article comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 5 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • -5 Hide
    houldendub , 5 September 2013 09:22
    "Yeah, that’s an easy one. But when you hop on a forum and ask, “Which graphics card should I buy, AMD’s Radeon HD 7970 or Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 770?” get ready for an epic war of words, often waged by folks who don’t own either one."

    Can you disable the graphics card forum then please Toms? We all know that 780 > 770 > 760 and all that, we may not own them but we may have used them, or seen them in use, or heard about their performance, or seen on sites like yours. Look on your own forums once in a while, most of the posts agree with each other on what someone should get.
  • 0 Hide
    Pailin , 5 September 2013 13:20
    Looking pretty good.

    Once AMD get the Eyefinity sorted and the odd game like Metro: Last Light sorted out, things will be ideal!

    Really looking forward to the upcoming AMD GFx cards.
    Been messing with Star Citizen's newly released Hangar module to view our ships - 1080 @ Max settings brings my 7950 @ 1,050 MHz down to an avg of 37 fps

    Upgrade time :) 
  • 0 Hide
    bc5 , 5 September 2013 13:25
    Quote:
    when you hop on a forum and ask, “Which graphics card should I buy, AMD’s Radeon HD 7970 or Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 770?” get ready for an epic war of words, often waged by folks who don’t own either one.


    Interesting comment given the amount of traffic the Tom's Hardware forums must be generating for you. But I can't deny though it's very true :-) Those forums can be a battlefield.
  • 0 Hide
    Pavel Pokidaylo , 11 September 2013 00:32
    "If Metro ran properly, the two dual-GPU cards might have come close to tying"!
    Why not take Metro LL out of the equation then?
  • 1 Hide
    Pavel Pokidaylo , 11 September 2013 00:42
    I have 7950s crossfired but I didn't experience that issue you guys had with MetroLL. I had another issue though, or atleast I think it may be an issue. I tried running Metro LL to see what kind of performance I'm getting from adding the second 7950. At 1080p and Maxed settings I was at a constant 60fps but when I turned up the Anti-Aliasing to X4, my FPS got cut in half. Tessellation also decreased my FPS but I'm more concerned about the AA.

    If I tried turning up the AA with just the one 7950 my FPS would decrease in most cases. Especially the very demanding games. But now with Crossfired 7950s I can turn up the AA in Crysis 3 and my Fps will be the same as it was with FXAA or even disabled. No clue why Metro LL FPS gets cut in half from cranking up the AA though.