Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Radeon HD 6990: Power, Cooling, And Size--All Extreme

AMD Radeon HD 6990 4 GB Review: Antilles Makes (Too Much) Noise
By

The Radeon HD 6990’s specifications are impressive, to say the least. Enabling them wasn’t easy. And in the process, AMD busted right through the PCI Express 2.0’s 300 W electro-mechanical specification for graphics cards (the Radeon HD 5970 ducked under it with a maximum board power of 294 W).

Officially, the Radeon HD 6990 is rated for up to 375 W. However, AMD claims it designed the card’s cooling solution to be 450 W-capable. Getting there requires two eight-pin auxiliary power connectors. Do the math and it all adds up: a PCI Express x16 slot serves up to 75 W, and each eight-pin connector is specified to deliver 150 W. That’s 375 W, on the dot.

Basically, AMD engineered this thing right up to the limits of what a second-gen PCI Express card can do within the specification for each of its power sources. And it pulled out all of the stops to get there, including specially-screened low-leakage ASICs (minimizing current leakage helps curtail power consumption), a symmetrical layout, and a purportedly higher-efficiency voltage regulation circuit with greater current capacity (we’d certainly hope so).

PowerTune technology also plays an important role in allowing AMD to maximize the 6990’s clock rates for games, while modulating the card’s thermal output in apps like OCCT, without exceeding the board’s limits. I’ll save you the background on PowerTune (I went into plenty of depth on the fifth page of our Cayman coverage). Suffice it to say, it’s still possible to increase/decrease the PowerTune threshold of this card, if you want to dial in its permitted power consumption more granularly.

It’s hardly a surprise that special effort had to go into cooling the 6990. The PCB is sandwiched on both sides by metal plates providing full-board heat dissipation. A vapour chamber-based heatsink sits on top of each GPU, with phase change thermal interface material between both components. According to AMD, it sees an 8% improvement in thermal performance compared to previous cooling solutions as a result of the gap-closing flow inherent to this class of TIM. A centrifugal fan sits between the two chambers in a mid-mounted orientation. AMD says its gets 20% more airflow from this implementation versus older designs with rear-mounted fans.

That’s the good news. The bad news is a fan in the centre means blowing half of your exhaust out the I/O bracket, where you want it to go, and the other half back into your chassis, where you decidedly don’t want it to go (especially when you’re talking about half of the heat from the hottest graphics card ever manufactured). Depending on your build, a mid-mounted fan can be a deal-breaker; it’ll almost assuredly cause complications in a dual-card configuration. But AMD doesn’t provide any guidance whatsoever regarding chassis requirements for this board.

As if to prove it engineered this card beyond what the second-gen PCI Express spec officially supports, AMD takes the dual-BIOS concept introduced on its single-GPU Radeon HD 6900-series cards and puts it to some use. By default, the Radeon HD 6990 runs an 830 MHz core clock at 1.12 V. Flip the switch next to the CrossFire connector, though, and both settings jump to 880 MHz and 1.175 V, respectively, upping the power ceiling to 450 W (clearly, those eight-pin connectors aren't limited to 150 W).

Now, this still isn’t the same as a Radeon HD 6970 since the memory clock remains at 1250 MHz in both cases. But AMD does facilitate clocks of up to 1200 MHz core and 1500 MHz memory through Overdrive. If you have the will to push this card further, AMD lays the foundation. Be forewarned, though. Even if you damage the card using its built-in second BIOS, warranty coverage won’t apply.

It’s Big, But No Bigger Than Radeon HD 5970

Early shots of vice president and general manager of AMD’s graphics products group Matt Skynner holding Radeon HD 6990 made the card look huge. And it is a big card. But at 12”, it’s no larger than the Radeon HD 5970.

Fortunately, both eight-pin power connectors are located on top of the card, rather than the back. If your case will take a foot-long graphics card, you don’t need to worry about extra clearance back there for cables. You do, however, have to worry about ventilation. Back the board up to a hard drive cage and you’re looking at hampered cooling capacity.

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the UK Article comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 12 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • -1 Hide
    doive1231 , 8 March 2011 15:31
    What about 10 display outputs from a Crossfire setup. Yeah!
  • 1 Hide
    prightiam , 8 March 2011 18:59
    So this thing is actually louder than the dustbuster?!
  • 2 Hide
    Anonymous , 8 March 2011 19:48
    I'm a bit puzzled by the lack of 580GTX SLi comparison? Once again an incomplete review. Sorry!
  • -1 Hide
    Sabiancym , 8 March 2011 20:28
    A lot of the people who would get these, including me, would water cool them. So the sound issue is gone.

    These things are beasts.
  • 2 Hide
    blubbey , 8 March 2011 20:55
    Crysis has finally been conquered. It only took a few years and an absurd amount of power, however =]
  • 0 Hide
    fruees , 9 March 2011 01:23
    This is why I'd never buy a super-high end card, the ppl that bought the 5990s dropped about £450 4 months ago and now their card isn't even mentioned in the high performance benchmarks!
  • 0 Hide
    evilgenius134 , 9 March 2011 02:09
    frueesThis is why I'd never buy a super-high end card, the ppl that bought the 5990s dropped about £450 4 months ago and now their card isn't even mentioned in the high performance benchmarks!


    The previous card to this is the 5970, and it is mentioned.
  • 0 Hide
    damian86 , 9 March 2011 06:27
    Yes, but still, you can't compare this to nvidias balance between image quality and speed. Radeons balance is unfortunately awful and I cannot see the driver issues getting better,it still need a touch of 'gamer' in software. A few years ago a comparision has been done with both of them and Radeons had a high percentage in causing BSODs.I can still hear people complaining about the drivers...
  • 0 Hide
    asteldian , 9 March 2011 22:00
    I hate 2 cards in one set ups. This just strengthens my distaste for them. I considered the GTX 480 a monster that should never have hit the shelves, now this beast has turned up, at least it can try and justify itself by being a double carder.
    AMD tend to be a bit sloppy with driver support for games at the best of times, I can only imagine the nightmare these will be
  • 0 Hide
    Anonymous , 10 March 2011 00:01
    asteldianAMD tend to be a bit sloppy with driver support for games at the best of times

    People say that, but I've never *ever* had a driver issue with ATI/AMD cards in the 10+ years I've been using them.
  • 0 Hide
    Griffolion , 10 March 2011 22:32
    Impressive stuff but let's wait to see what Nvidia comes out with in the 590. Considering that AMD has broken through the 300W ceiling very considerably, i'd like to see what Nvidia can pull off with a power budget of what the 6990 had.

    I have a 5970, and until games start to slow down that plus my I5 at 4GHz, I won't be buying anything new.
  • 0 Hide
    Solitaire , 11 March 2011 01:25
    Not just this card but everything based on the same PCB is little better than an engineering sample - its too impractical and I expect most board partners will be cooking up slightly shorter cards and vastly superior cooling solutions. Anyone buying a stock card is either mad or preparing to rip that horrid fan clean off and stick a hugeass waterblock on that card...