AMD Radeon HD 6450 Review: Caicos Cometh
Table of contents
- 1. Yes, Caicos Is Another Northern Island
- 2. The Radeon HD 6450 Reference Card
- 3. Test Setup And Benchmarks
- 4. Synthetic Benchmarks
- 5. Crysis 2
- 6. Left 4 Dead 2
AMD populates the entry-level tier with its new Radeon HD 6450, based on the Caicos graphics processor. Does this board have what it takes to stand out in the crowded low-end market and vie for a spot in your next home theater PC?
Hot on the heels of the Radeon HD 6790, AMD is releasing another new graphics card. This time the target is the sub-£50 price range, bringing Radeon 6000-series features to the entry-level market. Meet the Radeon HD 6450.

Low-end graphics cards account for the bulk of sales, and that means competition: the Radeon HD 5450, Radeon HD 5550, GeForce GT 220 and GeForce GT 430 are only a few of the models that folks will consider as alternatives. Before we compare them, let’s see what the new ‘Caicos’ GPU has to offer:

The Radeon HD 6450’s ‘Caicos’ GPU is based on the same architecture that we first saw in the Radeon HD 6800 series’ ‘Barts’ graphics processor. The new model is far less ambitious, with only 1/7th of the Radeon HD 6870’s vital statistics. Instead of 14 SIMD engines, the Caicos has two, each containing four texture units and 16 stream processors. With 5 ALU’s per stream processor, the resulting total is 160. These are coupled to a single render back-end with four colour ROPs, attached to a lone 64-bit memory controller.
It’s as though AMD paid close attention to our Radeon HD 5450 review in February of 2010, where we said: “It is unfortunate that that the SIMD engines have been cut in half compared to the GPUs found on… …higher models that sport a more robust 16 stream processors per.” Because each of ‘Caicos’ SIMDs sports the same specifications as the ones in ‘Barts’, we can expect a sizable performance gain over the Radeon HD 5450.
But that’s not the only improvement. The Radeon HD 6450 comes in two flavours: DDR3 and GDDR5. Since GDDR5 memory doubles the bandwidth vs. DDR3, this option should compensate for the restrictive 64-bit memory interface.
Finally, like all products in the Radeon HD 6000 family, this latest model boasts improved tessellation performance, Eyefinity enhancements, and of course UVD 3 including the ability to accelerate Blu-ray 3D video over HDMI 1.4a.
Now that we have a good idea how powerful the Radeon HD 6450 should be, let’s take a closer look at the playing field:
| Radeon HD 5450 | Radeon HD 6450 | Radeon HD 5550 | GeForce GT 220 | GeForce GT 430 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shader Cores: | 80 | 160 | 320 | 48 | 96 |
| Texture Units: | 8 | 8 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| Colour ROPs: | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 4 |
| Fabrication process: | 40 nm | 40 nm | 40 nm | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Core/Shader Clock: | 650 MHz | 625 MHz DDR3 750 MHz GDDR5 | 550 MHz | 625/1360 MHz | 700/1400 MHz |
| Memory Clock: | 400 MHz DDR2 800 MHz DDR3 | 533-800 MHz DDR3 800-900 MHz GDDR5 | 900 MHz DDR3 | 790 MHz DDR3 | 900 MHz DDR3 |
| Memory Bus: | 64-bit | 64-bit | 128-bit | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 6.4 GB/s DDR2 12.8 GB/s DDR3 | 8.5-12.8 GB/s DDR3 25.6-28.8 GB/s GDDR5 | 28.8 GB/s DDR3 | 25.3 GB/s DDR3 | 28.8 GB/s DDR3 |
| Thermal Design Power (W) | 40 | 20W DDR3 27W GDDR5 (Nominal) | 40 | 58 | 42.7 |
We can see a clear lineage between the Radeon HD 6450 and Radeon HD 5450, with only the number of stream processors doubled. This in itself should provide a huge performance advantage though, and when equipped with GDDR5 the new card should excel in the gaming arena.
The Radeon HD 5550 is far more interesting competition. It essentially doubles all of the Radeon HD 6450’s statistics: 320 shader processors, 16 texture units, and 8 ROPs over a 128-bit memory interface. While the GDDR5 version of the new card might be able to keep up when it comes to memory bandwidth, the higher core clock doesn’t compensate for the ‘Caicos’ hardware deficit. Of course, the Radeon HD 5550 doesn’t support Blu-ray 3D decode acceleration--although it is capable of playing back this format over HDMI 1.4a, the bulk of the work is left to the CPU.
The GeForce GT 220 DDR2 is also priced similarly to the Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5, and while it sports a powerful GPU and a 128-bit memory interface it is crippled by slower DDR2 memory. Ironically, despite Nvidia’s lead in the 3D arena this card is not capable of playing back Blu-ray 3D over HDMI—the GeForce GT 430 is Nvidia’s lowest-end card capable of this feat, and it typically costs about £60 (although a couple models can be found for as much as £8 cheaper than that online). Indeed, with twice as many shader cores as the GT 220, the GeForce GT 430 may offer the strongest competition for the 6450 on both the HTPC and gaming fronts.
Let’s have a closer look at the new card before we put it to the test.
- Nvidia,
- ATI,
- AMD,
- Graphics,
- radeon-hd-6450 ,
- caicos ,
- blu-ray-3d
Latest Graphics Cards News
- 20/05 – Qualcomm Hires Former AMD CTO Demers
- 18/05 – Nvidia Responds to GeForce 600 Series V-Sync Stuttering Issue
- 18/05 – Behold: Here Are The First Unreal Engine 4 Screens
- 17/05 – Nvidia Debuts GK110-based 7.1 Billion Transistor Super GPU
- 17/05 – GE Announces Kepler Graphics Card for Military and Aviation
Latest Graphics Cards reviews
- 18/05 – Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: May 2012
- 10/05 – Best Graphics Cards For The Money: May 2012
- 10/05 – GeForce GTX 670 2 GB Review: Is It Already Time To Forget GTX...
- 09/05 – Video Teaser: Radeon HD 7800 Series Remains A Solid Value
- 08/05 – Benchmarking AMD's 768-Shader Pitcairn: Not For Public...
I use a 5450 in the rig I mostly use, a HTPC hooked up to my HDTV. When I saw this article on the front page I immediately started planning my upgrade. But the fan is a deal-breaker. If it were passively cooled I would have switched, as it is I'll stick with the 5450.
^^^ you could always get a 5750 if you wanted to upgrade.
http://www.quietpc.com/gb-en-gbp/p [...] r575sl-1gi
Not really worth upgrading if your HTPC handles 1080p etc fine already.
"The passive, silent DDR3 version of the Radeon HD 5450 brings all of those traits to the table for around £35 (final pricing not confirmed)..."
well.... but i don't understand witch software, for 3d blu ray playback test, you use.... hd6450 is 3d accellerated but software like powerdvd can manage well only nvidia card 3d accellerated... with card like hd6450 all decoding work is "played" by cpu(my test...)what do you think about?
Luca
I've got the Sapphire HD 6450 with passive cooling and I've seen my temperatures go upto 80c while playing games. I decided to upgrade from a HD 2400 and it's made a significant performance boost for only £26 as you'd probably expect going from a low end card from 2007 haha. I also choose this card because of my PSU power limitations "250watt" and wanted to upgrade on a tight budget. I read on a site it had 18 watt usage and on here it says 20 watts.