Benchmark Results: Far Cry 2
Finally, we see ATI’s Radeon HD 5770 beat Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 260, though the Radeon HD 4870 is still a faster card. Additionally, the Radeon HD 5750 ekes past the GeForce GTS 250 1GB.
As we’ve seen before the scaling going from one Radeon card to two is very impressive in Far Cry 2. Two cards deliver solid results all the way up to 2560x1600 (though a single Radeon HD 5850 is perfectly playable at that resolution, too).
Applying anti-aliasing has a profound impact on performance, and the first thing we notice is that the 512MB frame buffer found on the Radeon HD 4770 is insufficient for 2560x1600.
Despite its inclusion of GDDR5 memory, the narrow 128-bit memory bus on ATI’s Radeon HD 5770 and halved number of more-efficient ROPs results in a loss to the Radeon HD 4870 and GeForce GTX 260. The Radeon HD 5750 is on par with Nvidia’s GeForce GTS 250, but only 1680x1050 is really a playable resolution.
on the test setup page;
"Corsair Dominator 4GB (3 x 2GB)"
shouldn't it be 2 x 2GB?
shouldn't these cards be able to overclock well, considering how energy efficient they are?
Where's my 5830?
The procesor bottle neck test you presented is just horrible!
For reasons readers will never know is why you left out AA in some of the bottle neck tests but added AA in some the previous benchmarks. For example on page 8 testsing farcry2 had test with AAx4 but not on the CPU bottle neck test, which is what you SHOULD be tsting for!
AA/AF uses the CPU where the graphics card can't handle it and for whatever reason you will come up with to answer me, i think you are simply trying to advertise the Core i5-750 CPU as some sort of incredible cpu that doesn't need overclocking. Are you being paid to do this on purpose are are you just really that shit at making decent review?
umm AA/AF is done purely on the graphics card.
So you're saying that someone forking out small money for a mid range gfx card sees the value in supporting three monitors? Sorry but I really can't see that proposition!
And the DX11 support to me seems a red herring too. Bit-Tech gave a more luke-warm reception and I have to say that I agree with them. DX11 is hardly a sell if the card can only just keep up with the upper-mid range in DX10? Its not like DX11 is going to increase FPS.....
Bitstreaming? Don't know enough to comment!
Thanks Chris.
Another good article.
Although Intel won't want to hear your last sentence I am sure AMD wins either way.
I think that was eskimo's point .. .wasn't it? Be happy with the Q3 earnings report.
We have long know that money spent on better graphics (or a second graphics card in SLI / CF) once you have a quad core runnng at around 3Ghz (Intel i7 or AMD Phenom II) gives much better value return for gaming than anything else.
wheres the overclocking?
Its not like DX11 is going to increase FPS.....Bitstreaming? Don't know enough to comment!
There's already battleforge out there that renders using dx11 subroutines, etc thats showing increase in fps over the dx10 version. So technically, its a game that's taking advantage of a dx11 feature to get higher fps.
http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/15721/1/
@ Anonymous 13/10/2009 16:37
Perhaps some of the people "forking out small money for a mid range gfx card" are in the market purely for a 3-monitor setup that previously they'd have to use multiple cards for? I don't know.
I would buy a 5770 for an HTPC (the idle power rating / core clock look pretty good to me) but not for anything else.
shouldn't these cards be able to overclock well, considering how energy efficient they are?
Yup. They should.
Worth noting ATI cards seem to have a lot of problems with decoding video streams - in particular there is an open problem with Win7 MCE and BBC HD over satellite.
@ anon
im pretty sure one of the big selling points of dx11 is how much more efficent it is, and how it can offer incresed performance with a higher level of visual fidelity.
so having a dx11 card will most likely prove to allow for higher framerates than a game run with a higher spec dx 10 only card.
I bought this card. My x1950 bit the dust in my last move, and I need a replacement under $200. My mobo only supports a single card, and this is probably the only upgrade I'll do for 2 years or more. At that point, my CPU will likely be a bottleneck (core 2 duo 2.1ghz, overclockable to 2.8 or so).
My thoughts: Of single card setups under $200, this one seems like the best long term value. Especially overclocked, it's as powerful as anything else at this price point, and it has DX11 support. It killed me that I bought my x1950, only to have DX10 come out and instantly obsolete my card... the 5770 won't have that problem. I recognize that I'm giving up a few fps in the short term, but in the long term... this card will be competitive for a longer time in its field.
i have a 5750 and i have oc it to gpu clock 750 and memory clock to 1250 when the card is at 97 % activity the card gets up to 64C! is that dangerous and can destroy my card?
The cards are entirely overclockable dependant on your current CPU/PSU set-up. I would advise buying an aftermarket cooling system also as the card can get incredibly hot when you unleash its potential! I myself have a 5770 and agree that it is a powerful card when combo with a good processor (e.g i5 or higher) excells in performance. And as for the price tag, its also very nice to look at for around £100 for the card (Even lower for the 5750) it is a very wise investment to make for any gaming enthusiast that doesn't want to rape their wallet.