Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

Core i7 965 Extreme Versus Athlon X2 7850

by

A Platform That Makes Sense

You’ll notice that we just ran that full suite of gaming tests on an Intel Core i7 965 Extreme-based machine, complete with X58 motherboard, 6 GB of pricey DDR3 RAM, and a 1,100W power supply—all to test a $109 graphics card.

We do this for a reason. When you test a platform that’s clearly overkill, you help minimize the number of potential bottlenecks that could inadvertently affect results. In a graphics card comparison, you want to reflect only the performance differences attributable to the card in question. But without a doubt, the configuration itself is unrealistic. So, we took what we hoped would be a sweet-spot setting, 1680x1050 without AA or AF enabled, and pit the powerful Core i7 965 Extreme against a significantly less-muscular processor being launched today, wondering if we’d see any performance variation.

The Athlon X2 7850 is a 65nm, 2.8 GHz chip based on the Kuma design. It sports two cores, twin 512 KB L2 caches, and a shared 2 MB L3 cache. With an expected price tag around $70, it’s a reasonable complement to the $109 graphics card. Ironically, you’d likely spend the most money on a motherboard in this little setup.

It’s generally thought that a majority of games are not optimized to take advantage of threading, but there is more than just a core discrepancy in play here. Clock speed, cache, micro-architecture are all different. But if these titles were purely graphics limited, none of that would matter and you’d still see similar performance numbers across the board.

A couple of apps are in fact decidedly limited by the muscle of our little Radeon HD 4770 here. Stalker and Crysis—two obvious contenders for such an honor—achieve low 30-ish frames per second on the $70 and $1,000 CPUs. The rest of the field does demonstrate bias toward the Core i7 965, though, subtly suggesting that we should probably recommend a quicker CPU for gamers. The Phenom II X3 720 does cost twice as much, but would likely make a prudent upgrade. Far Cry 2, Left 4 Dead, World in Conflict, and Grand Theft Auto 4 all stand to benefit from a quicker CPU.

Share:
5
Comments
Read more
X
Submit

Comments
Read the comments on the forums
ainarssems 28/04/2009 11:17
Hide
-0+

What a shame they could not shave few watts off power consumtion to use it without PCIe power connector. Or at least made the card to work without it and PCIe power connection as optional when You overclock. Hopefully some of the board partners will do that.

jennyh 28/04/2009 12:44
Hide
-0+

Pretty decent review.

Anonymous 28/04/2009 13:46
Hide
-0+

Question on Test Setup: what are the GPU/GDDR clocks? Reference?

wild9 29/04/2009 23:58
Hide
-0+

This just goes to show that AMD is more than CPU's. Looks like you get a lot of card for your money here, and it's not a hand-me-down technology, either; it's cutting-edge.

jimmanybilybob 30/04/2009 02:08
Hide
-0+

Here is a rivetuner edit that works. Just change RV770 = 9440h-9443h,944Ch into RV770 = 9440h-9443h,944Ch,94B3h in Rivatuner.cfg

I got mine to 888/1000
http://gpuz.techpowerup.com/09/04/29/5ka.png

for 76 quids is unbelievable

Best offers

Newsletters


OK