PCIe Interface: $150 to $300
Best PCIe Card For $160:
Good 1920x1200 performance in most games, some with lowered detail
| Codename: | RV770 |
| Process: | 55 nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 800 |
| Texture Units: | 40 |
| ROPs: | 16 |
| Memory Bus: | 256-bit |
| Core Speed MHz: | 625 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 993 (1,986 effective) |
| DirectX / Shader Model | DX 10.1 / SM 4.0 |
The Radeon HD 4850 is the new people’s champion, instantly bringing yesterday’s $300 performance level down to the mainstream $160 price point. The Radeon HD 4850 will usually best the GeForce 9800 GTX+. This card has a lot of potential when used on its own, and becomes a devastating force when paired with a second 4850 in a CrossFire configuration.
Best PCIe Card For $215: Tie
Good 1920x1200 performance
| Codename: | RV770 |
| Process: | 55 nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 800 |
| Texture Units: | 40 |
| ROPs: | 16 |
| Memory Bus: | 256-bit |
| Core Speed MHz: | 750 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 900 (3,600 effective) |
| DirectX / Shader Model | DX 10.1 / SM 4.0 |
The Radeon HD 4870 offers the same architecture that the 4850 series does, paired with its secret weapon: brand-new GDDR5 memory. This technology provides about twice as much throughput as the GDDR3 does, so its 900 MHz clock speed is comparable to a 3,600 MHz effective memory speed. This edge allows the 4870 to up the ante and offer a very compelling level of performance for the price, even competing with the more-expensive GTX 280 in some titles.
| Codename: | GT200 |
| Process: | 65 nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 192 |
| Texture Units: | 64 |
| ROPs: | 28 |
| Memory Bus: | 448-bit |
| Core Speed MHz: | 576 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 999 (1,998 effective) |
| DirectX / Shader Model | DX 10 / SM 4.0 |
The GeForce GTX 260 offers a compelling level of performance now that its price has been reduced to $220, allowing it to trade blows with the Radeon HD 4870 on its own turf. This is one of those situations where a buyer really should look at which card is best for the games he or she plans to play (although you really can’t go wrong with either card).
Best PCIe Card For $265: Tie
Good 1920x1200 performance
| Codename: | GT200 |
| Process: | 65 nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 216 |
| Texture Units: | 72 |
| ROPs: | 28 |
| Memory Bus: | 448-bit |
| Core Speed MHz: | 576 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 999 (1,998 effective) |
| DirectX / Shader Model | DX 10 / SM 4.0 |
We designate the new version of the GeForce GTX 260 with a “+” symbol to differentiate it from its identically-named older sibling. Even though there is no official difference between the two cards, the new GTX 260+ has some very tangible performance increases over the original version. For example, the number of shaders have been increased from 192 to 216, which are within spitting distance of the GeForce GTX 280’s 240 shaders. ROPs have been increased from 64 to 72, once again approaching the GTX 280’s 80 ROPs.
The result is a card that performs almost as well as the expensive GeForce GTX 280, for much less money, and it even beats the GTX 280 when overclocked! You must carefully search for the GeForce GTX 260+ by looking hard at the specifications, but it is certainly worth the price premium over the original GTX 260.
| Codename: | RV770 |
| Process: | 55 nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 800 |
| Texture Units: | 40 |
| ROPs: | 16 |
| Memory Bus: | 256-bit |
| Core Speed MHz: | 750 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 900 (3,600 effective) |
| DirectX / Shader Model | DX 10.1 / SM 4.0 |
It turns out that the Radeon 4870, when equipped with a whole gigabyte of GDDR5 RAM, can up the ante to compete against the GeForce GTX 260+ in some titles. As usual when it comes to these two tough competitors, it pays to look at the benchmarks and see which title you play more, as they tend to trade blows depending on the game.
Although it's beyond Tom's control, wouldn't it have been easier to simply post here "no new cards, so read last month's" however I appreciate the rewording to actually focus on single cards, not multi-card setups.
Dollars?!
No sign of the Catalyst 8.12 driver on the AMD/ATi site?...
http://game.amd.com/us-en/drivers_catalyst.aspx
Latest is still 8.11.
Mark.
Yeah it's dollars, apparently there is no UK content on this site - so I'm not sure why the .co.uk is different from the .com!
well here we go again... lets say that the 4850x2 is better than the gtx 280, when we have to deal with buggy(not to mention shitty) crossfire support in some titles, expecially when they first comeout
Yeah it's dollars, apparently there is no UK content on this site - so I'm not sure why the .co.uk is different from the .com!
I registered a few months ago just to make this point. Kind of stopped coming to Tom's and the uk site in particular. I come back to check and they're still touting a UK site, but no UK content at all. Why not just be honest and have the US site as the english language site?
What's the second resource to help you understand where your card fits (page7)? I assume it's supposed to be the big graphics chart comparison tool? Which is great... but way too hard to find. A link in here would sure help
nnn