PCI Express (PCIe) Interface: $0 to $80
Best PCIe Card For $60:
Good 1440x900 performance in most games
| Codename: | RV730 |
| Process: | 55 nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 320 |
| Texture Units: | 32 |
| ROPs: | 8 |
| Memory Bus: | 128-bit |
| Core Speed MHz: | 600 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 500 (1000 effective) |
| DirectX / Shader Model | DX 10.1 / SM 4.0 |
With the Radeon HD 4650’s price dropping to $60, we have a really attractive budget gaming option that takes us past the old budget 1280x1024 limitation. The 4650 is simply an underclocked Radeon 4670, which by now has a reputation as being a very fast mainstream card with low power requirements. Well, the 4650 requires even less power and offers very good gaming performance for the price.
The 4650 is also an exemplary choice for a home theater PC because it can accelerate even HD video without breaking a sweat, and since it’s a single-slot solution, the card won’t use up too much space in your HTPC.
Best PCIe Card For $80: Tie
Good 1600x1200 performance in most games
| Codename: | RV730 |
| Process: | 55 nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 320 |
| Texture Units: | 32 |
| ROPs: | 8 |
| Memory Bus: | 128-bit |
| Core Speed MHz: | 750 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 1,000 (2,000 effective) |
| DirectX / Shader Model | DX 10.1 / SM 4.0 |
The Radeon HD 4670 slaps previous-generation, high-end performance squarely in the jaw of mid-range pricing. With 320 shader processors, this card means business and will provide awesome 1600x1200 gaming. Compared to the 9600 GSO, its main advantage is a low-power requirement—the 4870 doesn’t need an external power cable, which for some upgraders is a really important feature.
| Codename: | G92 |
| Process: | 65 nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 96 |
| Texture Units: | 48 |
| ROPs: | 12 |
| Memory Bus: | 192- or 128-bit |
| Core Speed MHz: | 600 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 900 (1,800 effective) |
| DirectX / Shader Model | DX 10 / SM 4.0 |
Previously a high-end card crippled and transformed into a high- to mid-range card, the release of the Radeon HD 4670 has forced the 9600 GSO to a lower price to remain competitive—which it does. It’s an excellent alternative to the 4670, as long as the buyer compares clock speeds and makes sure he or she has one of the desirable models (manufacturers seem to follow the reference speeds very loosely).
Although it's beyond Tom's control, wouldn't it have been easier to simply post here "no new cards, so read last month's" however I appreciate the rewording to actually focus on single cards, not multi-card setups.
Dollars?!
No sign of the Catalyst 8.12 driver on the AMD/ATi site?...
http://game.amd.com/us-en/drivers_catalyst.aspx
Latest is still 8.11.
Mark.
Yeah it's dollars, apparently there is no UK content on this site - so I'm not sure why the .co.uk is different from the .com!
well here we go again... lets say that the 4850x2 is better than the gtx 280, when we have to deal with buggy(not to mention shitty) crossfire support in some titles, expecially when they first comeout
Yeah it's dollars, apparently there is no UK content on this site - so I'm not sure why the .co.uk is different from the .com!
I registered a few months ago just to make this point. Kind of stopped coming to Tom's and the uk site in particular. I come back to check and they're still touting a UK site, but no UK content at all. Why not just be honest and have the US site as the english language site?
What's the second resource to help you understand where your card fits (page7)? I assume it's supposed to be the big graphics chart comparison tool? Which is great... but way too hard to find. A link in here would sure help
nnn