Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

Swapping Old Chips for New

by

Swapping a GeForce 9800 GX2 for a GTX 280 provides slight benefits in Crysis and in World in Conflict (at high resolution with anti-aliasing), but the dual-chip card had minor optimization problems in the test. In the other games, the increases are beyond 60, 80 or 100 fps.

Taking an older GeForce 8800 GTS 512 and putting in a new GTX 260 will actually only show visible improvements in World in Conflict. In Mass Effect, the new GTX 260 brings slight benefits with anti-aliasing at high resolutions—you actually feel the effects of the faster memory. In Crysis the increases are good, but the frame rates remain under 25 fps.

If you add the Radeon HD 4850 to this comparison, the results don’t get much better. The AMD chip provides benefits in World in Conflict and leaves the competition way behind.

A change from the Radeon HD 3850 to the Radeon HD 4850 brings visibly more power. The UT3 Engine (Mass Effect) responds particularly well to the new graphics chip. Assassin’s Creed and World in Conflict reach smooth playing ranges, with excellent optimization of DirectX 10 and anti-aliasing.

The change from the Radeon HD 3870 to the HD 4870 is similar to that going from the 3850 to the 4850—the UT3 Engine of Mass Effect runs better, and Assassin’s Creed and World in Conflict can be played more smoothly with full graphics quality and high resolutions.

Changing from the dual-chip card with the Radeon HD 3870 X2 to the new HD 4870 isn’t very sensible. The difference in performance in the lower regions is too low. But for a new purchase, you should take advantage of the additional performance and go straight for the Radeon HD 4870.

Share:
21
Comments
Read more
X
Submit

Comments
Read the comments on the forums
mightybaz 30/08/2008 02:08
Hide
-0+

Yet again, loads of this review is missing - get your fingers out people!

Silverwolf 30/08/2008 08:50
Hide
-0+

yeh what the?? Someone isn't uploading these articles properly, only 7 pages showing, and no scroll bar on the drop down, or even a "next page" link. Only uploaded half the article?

sanderhoudini 30/08/2008 11:33
Hide
-0+

rofl, i don't mean to be picky... but i'm missing something ^_^

bobwya 30/08/2008 11:43
Hide
-0+

To be continued next month folks....

(Or pop over to the USA website for spoilers!!) :lol:

Bob

bobwya 30/08/2008 11:45
Hide
-0+

Quote :Page 7 (final page in the UK/ middle in the USA)
Under 3D full load, the GeForce GTX 260 consumes 336 watts. A solid power supply with 280 to 320 watts of overall power and 23 to 27 A on the 12 volt rail should be sufficient here.


Uhhmmm isn't 336 Watts > 280-320 Watts ??

bobwya 30/08/2008 20:52
Hide
-0+

I've been over to the US site.. The article isn't worth reading guys as the Catalyst driver (v 8.6) is totally out-of-date (current: v 8.8). Just a heads up!! :crazy:

Bob

Millohh 31/08/2008 23:42
Hide
-0+

well - wouldn't it be obvious to review HD 4870 X2 2GB DDR5 Dual GPU ??? it's the best card from radeon right?

Anonymous 01/09/2008 10:26
Hide
-1+

So once again we only have half of the article? WTF?

Could THG get any worse?

MagicWok 01/09/2008 12:35
Hide
-1+

Once again Toms UK screws up royally.

Another copy and paste from the US site - and a half-arsed effort at that.

Utter bollocks - just read the US Toms site. All the pages are from there anyway (UK 'staff' can't even bother to change $ to £ in articles) and they're complete.

MagicWok 01/09/2008 12:36
Hide
-0+

iJacks :
So once again we only have half of the article? WTF?Could THG get any worse?



Has been going on for a long time iJacks...

marshallman 01/09/2008 16:16
Hide
-1+

BobWya :
I've been over to the US site.. The article isn't worth reading guys as the Catalyst driver (v 8.6) is totally out-of-date (current: v 8.8). Just a heads up!! Bob



+1

Yeh the review is pretty much pointless cos drivers are several months out of date.

paradigital 01/09/2008 17:54
Hide
-0+

Surely if you are comparing "the fastest 3D cards", the 4870X2 should be here :/

Yet another TomsHardFail.

sonofhendrix 02/09/2008 10:43
Hide
-0+

4870X2??? and i can't see any benchmarks here.

Anonymous 04/09/2008 12:56
Hide
-0+

Be nice to have the 9800gx2 in SLI
as also the 280 in TRI SLI
and as others have mention the GDDR5 4870
Maybe these other top dogs will appear in another review.

mi1ez 04/09/2008 12:57
Hide
-0+

Haven't I read this already?

Why is it back at the top of the list? Because we have the missing 29 pages?

Anonymous 06/09/2008 16:49
Hide
-0+

witch is faster : HD3850 512mb or 8800GT 256mb ? ant how many %? thx

bobwya 06/09/2008 22:34
Hide
-0+

dnx :
witch is faster : HD3850 512mb or 8800GT 256mb ? ant how many %? thx



8800GT

Anonymous 08/09/2008 11:18
Hide
-0+

How can I check the us page? if I write www.tomshardware.com in my firefox browser I am redirected automatically to www.tomshardware.co.uk. I want to see the .com, not the .co.uk

bobwya 08/09/2008 11:27
Hide
-0+

Dirich :
How can I check the us page? if I write www.tomshardware.com in my firefox browser I am redirected automatically to www.tomshardware.co.uk. I want to see the .com, not the .co.uk



Use:


We can see the whole GPU article on the UK website now anyway... Yippie!! :crazy:

Bob

bobwya 08/09/2008 11:28
Hide
-0+

Sorry (stupid THG comments not working, mutter, mutter)...

Use:
http://www.tomshardware.com/us/

Bob


Best offers

Newsletters


OK