Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

How Overclocking Affected The MSI Cards

by

The first table shows an overview of clock speed. The profile with low-power 3D was introduced by Nvidia, as the GTX 200-series card switch from 3D mode to an intermediate level before finally switching to 2D on the Windows desktop. The 3D profile does not apply to the overclocked MSI test cards, as these are running with modified values.

With the Radeon HD 4870 from AMD, the memory is usually clocked at the same rate in both 2D and 3D mode. For a standard card, the correct clock specification would be 500/500/1,800 MHz, and the 2D table specification refers to the overclocked MSI version with a 2,000 MHz memory rate. As you can see, all cards clock back in 2D mode.

Clocking rates MHz 2D Low Power 3D 3D normal 3D OC (MSI)
GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB) 300/600/100 400/800/300 602/1296/1107 700/1400/1150
GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) 300/600/100 400/800/300 576/1242/999 620/1296/1080
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 500/500/2000 0 750/750/1800 780/780/2000
Radeon HD 4850 (512 MB) 500/500/750 0 625/625/993 0

Order of the clocking specifications: GPU/shader/Memory
Otherwise, memory rate is given doubled

This is how the overclocked speeds of the MSI cards affected the individual benchmarks. All test values were recorded at a resolution of 1920x1200, with anti-aliasing, anisotropic filtering and maximum image quality activated:

Assassin’s Creed
4xAA, Game AF
fps normal fps OC Percent
GeForce GTX 280 SLI (1024 MB) 46.0 46.3 0.7
GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB) 47.8 49.2 2.9
GeForce GTX 260 SLI (896 MB) 46.3 46.3 0.0
GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) 41.1 43.5 5.8
Radeon HD 4870 CF (512 MB) 43.7 43.9 0.5
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 43.5 44.0 1.1

Call of Duty 4
4xAA, 8xAF
fps normal fps OC Percent
GeForce GTX 280 SLI (1024 MB) 135.9 132.9 -2.2
GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB) 103.2 111.8 8.3
GeForce GTX 260 SLI (896 MB) 122.5 123.4 0.7
GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) 87.4 92.7 6.1
Radeon HD 4870 CF (512 MB) 111.7 111.6 -0.1
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 94.7 98.4 3.9

Crysis
4xAA, 8xAF
fps normal fps OC Percent
GeForce GTX 280 SLI (1024 MB) 22.4 22.0 -1.8
GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB) 16.3 17.7 8.6
GeForce GTX 260 SLI (896 MB) 21.6 22.2 2.8
GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) 12.6 13.2 4.8
Radeon HD 4870 CF (512 MB) 14.5 17.2 18.6
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 10.8 12.2 13.0

ET: Quake Wars
4xAA, 8xAF
fps normal fps OC Percent
GeForce GTX 280 SLI (1024 MB) 73.8 74.6 1.1
GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB) 81.2 84.2 3.7
GeForce GTX 260 SLI (896 MB) 73.1 74.6 2.1
GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) 80.5 81.1 0.7
Radeon HD 4870 CF (512 MB) 52.9 55.1 4.2
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 64.1 66.8 4.2

Half Life 2 Episode 2
4xAA, 8xAF
fps normal fps OC Percent
GeForce GTX 280 SLI (1024 MB) 77.7 79.6 2.4
GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB) 99.0 99.0 0.0
GeForce GTX 260 SLI (896 MB) 77.0 79.3 3.0
GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) 96.5 98.8 2.4
Radeon HD 4870 CF (512 MB) 96.2 98.3 2.2
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 100.1 100.2 0.1

Mass Effect
8xAA, Game AF
fps normal fps OC Percent
GeForce GTX 280 SLI (1024 MB) 74.6 74.0 -0.8
GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB) 60.6 70.3 16.0
GeForce GTX 260 SLI (896 MB) 72.8 77.8 6.9
GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) 49.3 56.3 14.2
Radeon HD 4870 CF (512 MB) 72.2 76.5 6.0
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 37.8 39.6 4.8

Microsoft Flight Simulator X SP2
Game AA, Game AF
fps normal fps OC Percent
GeForce GTX 280 SLI (1024 MB) 26.5 25.1 -5.3
GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB) 31.3 30.5 -2.6
GeForce GTX 260 SLI (896 MB) 26.0 25.9 -0.4
GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) 30.3 28.8 -5.0
Radeon HD 4870 CF (512 MB) 25.3 23.9 -5.5
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 25.6 24.8 -3.1

World in Conflict
4xAA, 4xAF
fps normal fps OC Percent
GeForce GTX 280 SLI (1024 MB) 45.6 44.2 -3.1
GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB) 32.8 35.8 9.1
GeForce GTX 260 SLI (896 MB) 43.3 44.5 2.8
GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) 27.6 29.5 6.9
Radeon HD 4870 CF (512 MB) 44.6 46.8 4.9
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 34.8 36.3 4.3

AMD displays the highest values in Crysis, but the frame rates still drop to unplayable levels below 25 fps. The MSI cards with Nvidia GPUs increase considerably with the UT3 Engine in Mass Effect. The increase with the GTX 260 may have a positive effect on the game. In Flight Simulator, negative values caused by overclocked 3D cards is normal, as less graphics performance relieves the CPU of load so the net effect can be higher.

Overall results, OC Percent
GeForce GTX 280 SLI (1024 MB) -1.1
GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB) 5.8
GeForce GTX 260 SLI (896 MB) 2.2
GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) 4.5
Radeon HD 4870 CF (512 MB) 3.8
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 3.5

The MSI GeForce GTX 280 Superclocked has great potential with a 5.8% overall improvement. With normal overclocking, 3% is normal, and a 4-5% increase in overall results is a very good result. With a faster CPU, the SLI and CrossFire combinations should be able to achieve even greater increases. The test computer reaches its limit with the faster dual-card combos, as can be seen from the negative test values.

Share:
21
Comments
Read more
X
Submit

Comments
Read the comments on the forums
mightybaz 30/08/2008 02:08
Hide
-0+

Yet again, loads of this review is missing - get your fingers out people!

Silverwolf 30/08/2008 08:50
Hide
-0+

yeh what the?? Someone isn't uploading these articles properly, only 7 pages showing, and no scroll bar on the drop down, or even a "next page" link. Only uploaded half the article?

sanderhoudini 30/08/2008 11:33
Hide
-0+

rofl, i don't mean to be picky... but i'm missing something ^_^

bobwya 30/08/2008 11:43
Hide
-0+

To be continued next month folks....

(Or pop over to the USA website for spoilers!!) :lol:

Bob

bobwya 30/08/2008 11:45
Hide
-0+

Quote :Page 7 (final page in the UK/ middle in the USA)
Under 3D full load, the GeForce GTX 260 consumes 336 watts. A solid power supply with 280 to 320 watts of overall power and 23 to 27 A on the 12 volt rail should be sufficient here.


Uhhmmm isn't 336 Watts > 280-320 Watts ??

bobwya 30/08/2008 20:52
Hide
-0+

I've been over to the US site.. The article isn't worth reading guys as the Catalyst driver (v 8.6) is totally out-of-date (current: v 8.8). Just a heads up!! :crazy:

Bob

Millohh 31/08/2008 23:42
Hide
-0+

well - wouldn't it be obvious to review HD 4870 X2 2GB DDR5 Dual GPU ??? it's the best card from radeon right?

Anonymous 01/09/2008 10:26
Hide
-1+

So once again we only have half of the article? WTF?

Could THG get any worse?

MagicWok 01/09/2008 12:35
Hide
-1+

Once again Toms UK screws up royally.

Another copy and paste from the US site - and a half-arsed effort at that.

Utter bollocks - just read the US Toms site. All the pages are from there anyway (UK 'staff' can't even bother to change $ to £ in articles) and they're complete.

MagicWok 01/09/2008 12:36
Hide
-0+

iJacks :
So once again we only have half of the article? WTF?Could THG get any worse?



Has been going on for a long time iJacks...

marshallman 01/09/2008 16:16
Hide
-1+

BobWya :
I've been over to the US site.. The article isn't worth reading guys as the Catalyst driver (v 8.6) is totally out-of-date (current: v 8.8). Just a heads up!! Bob



+1

Yeh the review is pretty much pointless cos drivers are several months out of date.

paradigital 01/09/2008 17:54
Hide
-0+

Surely if you are comparing "the fastest 3D cards", the 4870X2 should be here :/

Yet another TomsHardFail.

sonofhendrix 02/09/2008 10:43
Hide
-0+

4870X2??? and i can't see any benchmarks here.

Anonymous 04/09/2008 12:56
Hide
-0+

Be nice to have the 9800gx2 in SLI
as also the 280 in TRI SLI
and as others have mention the GDDR5 4870
Maybe these other top dogs will appear in another review.

mi1ez 04/09/2008 12:57
Hide
-0+

Haven't I read this already?

Why is it back at the top of the list? Because we have the missing 29 pages?

Anonymous 06/09/2008 16:49
Hide
-0+

witch is faster : HD3850 512mb or 8800GT 256mb ? ant how many %? thx

bobwya 06/09/2008 22:34
Hide
-0+

dnx :
witch is faster : HD3850 512mb or 8800GT 256mb ? ant how many %? thx



8800GT

Anonymous 08/09/2008 11:18
Hide
-0+

How can I check the us page? if I write www.tomshardware.com in my firefox browser I am redirected automatically to www.tomshardware.co.uk. I want to see the .com, not the .co.uk

bobwya 08/09/2008 11:27
Hide
-0+

Dirich :
How can I check the us page? if I write www.tomshardware.com in my firefox browser I am redirected automatically to www.tomshardware.co.uk. I want to see the .com, not the .co.uk



Use:


We can see the whole GPU article on the UK website now anyway... Yippie!! :crazy:

Bob

bobwya 08/09/2008 11:28
Hide
-0+

Sorry (stupid THG comments not working, mutter, mutter)...

Use:
http://www.tomshardware.com/us/

Bob


Best offers

Newsletters


OK