How Overclocking Affected The MSI Cards
The first table shows an overview of clock speed. The profile with low-power 3D was introduced by Nvidia, as the GTX 200-series card switch from 3D mode to an intermediate level before finally switching to 2D on the Windows desktop. The 3D profile does not apply to the overclocked MSI test cards, as these are running with modified values.
With the Radeon HD 4870 from AMD, the memory is usually clocked at the same rate in both 2D and 3D mode. For a standard card, the correct clock specification would be 500/500/1,800 MHz, and the 2D table specification refers to the overclocked MSI version with a 2,000 MHz memory rate. As you can see, all cards clock back in 2D mode.
| Clocking rates MHz | 2D | Low Power 3D | 3D normal | 3D OC (MSI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB) | 300/600/100 | 400/800/300 | 602/1296/1107 | 700/1400/1150 |
| GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) | 300/600/100 | 400/800/300 | 576/1242/999 | 620/1296/1080 |
| Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) | 500/500/2000 | 0 | 750/750/1800 | 780/780/2000 |
| Radeon HD 4850 (512 MB) | 500/500/750 | 0 | 625/625/993 | 0 |
Order of the clocking specifications: GPU/shader/Memory
Otherwise, memory rate is given doubled
This is how the overclocked speeds of the MSI cards affected the individual benchmarks. All test values were recorded at a resolution of 1920x1200, with anti-aliasing, anisotropic filtering and maximum image quality activated:
| Assassin’s Creed 4xAA, Game AF | fps normal | fps OC | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 280 SLI (1024 MB) | 46.0 | 46.3 | 0.7 |
| GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB) | 47.8 | 49.2 | 2.9 |
| GeForce GTX 260 SLI (896 MB) | 46.3 | 46.3 | 0.0 |
| GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) | 41.1 | 43.5 | 5.8 |
| Radeon HD 4870 CF (512 MB) | 43.7 | 43.9 | 0.5 |
| Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) | 43.5 | 44.0 | 1.1 |
| Call of Duty 4 4xAA, 8xAF | fps normal | fps OC | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 280 SLI (1024 MB) | 135.9 | 132.9 | -2.2 |
| GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB) | 103.2 | 111.8 | 8.3 |
| GeForce GTX 260 SLI (896 MB) | 122.5 | 123.4 | 0.7 |
| GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) | 87.4 | 92.7 | 6.1 |
| Radeon HD 4870 CF (512 MB) | 111.7 | 111.6 | -0.1 |
| Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) | 94.7 | 98.4 | 3.9 |
| Crysis 4xAA, 8xAF | fps normal | fps OC | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 280 SLI (1024 MB) | 22.4 | 22.0 | -1.8 |
| GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB) | 16.3 | 17.7 | 8.6 |
| GeForce GTX 260 SLI (896 MB) | 21.6 | 22.2 | 2.8 |
| GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) | 12.6 | 13.2 | 4.8 |
| Radeon HD 4870 CF (512 MB) | 14.5 | 17.2 | 18.6 |
| Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) | 10.8 | 12.2 | 13.0 |
| ET: Quake Wars 4xAA, 8xAF | fps normal | fps OC | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 280 SLI (1024 MB) | 73.8 | 74.6 | 1.1 |
| GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB) | 81.2 | 84.2 | 3.7 |
| GeForce GTX 260 SLI (896 MB) | 73.1 | 74.6 | 2.1 |
| GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) | 80.5 | 81.1 | 0.7 |
| Radeon HD 4870 CF (512 MB) | 52.9 | 55.1 | 4.2 |
| Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) | 64.1 | 66.8 | 4.2 |
| Half Life 2 Episode 2 4xAA, 8xAF | fps normal | fps OC | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 280 SLI (1024 MB) | 77.7 | 79.6 | 2.4 |
| GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB) | 99.0 | 99.0 | 0.0 |
| GeForce GTX 260 SLI (896 MB) | 77.0 | 79.3 | 3.0 |
| GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) | 96.5 | 98.8 | 2.4 |
| Radeon HD 4870 CF (512 MB) | 96.2 | 98.3 | 2.2 |
| Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) | 100.1 | 100.2 | 0.1 |
| Mass Effect 8xAA, Game AF | fps normal | fps OC | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 280 SLI (1024 MB) | 74.6 | 74.0 | -0.8 |
| GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB) | 60.6 | 70.3 | 16.0 |
| GeForce GTX 260 SLI (896 MB) | 72.8 | 77.8 | 6.9 |
| GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) | 49.3 | 56.3 | 14.2 |
| Radeon HD 4870 CF (512 MB) | 72.2 | 76.5 | 6.0 |
| Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) | 37.8 | 39.6 | 4.8 |
| Microsoft Flight Simulator X SP2 Game AA, Game AF | fps normal | fps OC | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 280 SLI (1024 MB) | 26.5 | 25.1 | -5.3 |
| GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB) | 31.3 | 30.5 | -2.6 |
| GeForce GTX 260 SLI (896 MB) | 26.0 | 25.9 | -0.4 |
| GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) | 30.3 | 28.8 | -5.0 |
| Radeon HD 4870 CF (512 MB) | 25.3 | 23.9 | -5.5 |
| Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) | 25.6 | 24.8 | -3.1 |
| World in Conflict 4xAA, 4xAF | fps normal | fps OC | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 280 SLI (1024 MB) | 45.6 | 44.2 | -3.1 |
| GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB) | 32.8 | 35.8 | 9.1 |
| GeForce GTX 260 SLI (896 MB) | 43.3 | 44.5 | 2.8 |
| GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) | 27.6 | 29.5 | 6.9 |
| Radeon HD 4870 CF (512 MB) | 44.6 | 46.8 | 4.9 |
| Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) | 34.8 | 36.3 | 4.3 |
AMD displays the highest values in Crysis, but the frame rates still drop to unplayable levels below 25 fps. The MSI cards with Nvidia GPUs increase considerably with the UT3 Engine in Mass Effect. The increase with the GTX 260 may have a positive effect on the game. In Flight Simulator, negative values caused by overclocked 3D cards is normal, as less graphics performance relieves the CPU of load so the net effect can be higher.
| Overall results, OC | Percent |
|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 280 SLI (1024 MB) | -1.1 |
| GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB) | 5.8 |
| GeForce GTX 260 SLI (896 MB) | 2.2 |
| GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) | 4.5 |
| Radeon HD 4870 CF (512 MB) | 3.8 |
| Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) | 3.5 |
The MSI GeForce GTX 280 Superclocked has great potential with a 5.8% overall improvement. With normal overclocking, 3% is normal, and a 4-5% increase in overall results is a very good result. With a faster CPU, the SLI and CrossFire combinations should be able to achieve even greater increases. The test computer reaches its limit with the faster dual-card combos, as can be seen from the negative test values.
- radeon ,
- geforce ,
- comparison
- 1 / 2
- Next
-

Yet again, loads of this review is missing - get your fingers out people!
yeh what the?? Someone isn't uploading these articles properly, only 7 pages showing, and no scroll bar on the drop down, or even a "next page" link. Only uploaded half the article?
rofl, i don't mean to be picky... but i'm missing something ^_^
To be continued next month folks....

(Or pop over to the USA website for spoilers!!)
Bob
Under 3D full load, the GeForce GTX 260 consumes 336 watts. A solid power supply with 280 to 320 watts of overall power and 23 to 27 A on the 12 volt rail should be sufficient here.
Uhhmmm isn't 336 Watts > 280-320 Watts ??
I've been over to the US site.. The article isn't worth reading guys as the Catalyst driver (v 8.6) is totally out-of-date (current: v 8.8). Just a heads up!!
Bob
well - wouldn't it be obvious to review HD 4870 X2 2GB DDR5 Dual GPU ??? it's the best card from radeon right?
So once again we only have half of the article? WTF?
Could THG get any worse?
Once again Toms UK screws up royally.
Another copy and paste from the US site - and a half-arsed effort at that.
Utter bollocks - just read the US Toms site. All the pages are from there anyway (UK 'staff' can't even bother to change $ to £ in articles) and they're complete.
So once again we only have half of the article? WTF?Could THG get any worse?
Has been going on for a long time iJacks...
I've been over to the US site.. The article isn't worth reading guys as the Catalyst driver (v 8.6) is totally out-of-date (current: v 8.8). Just a heads up!! Bob
+1
Yeh the review is pretty much pointless cos drivers are several months out of date.
Surely if you are comparing "the fastest 3D cards", the 4870X2 should be here
Yet another TomsHardFail.
4870X2??? and i can't see any benchmarks here.
Be nice to have the 9800gx2 in SLI
as also the 280 in TRI SLI
and as others have mention the GDDR5 4870
Maybe these other top dogs will appear in another review.
Haven't I read this already?
Why is it back at the top of the list? Because we have the missing 29 pages?
witch is faster : HD3850 512mb or 8800GT 256mb ? ant how many %? thx
witch is faster : HD3850 512mb or 8800GT 256mb ? ant how many %? thx
8800GT
How can I check the us page? if I write www.tomshardware.com in my firefox browser I am redirected automatically to www.tomshardware.co.uk. I want to see the .com, not the .co.uk
How can I check the us page? if I write www.tomshardware.com in my firefox browser I am redirected automatically to www.tomshardware.co.uk. I want to see the .com, not the .co.uk
Use:
We can see the whole GPU article on the UK website now anyway... Yippie!!
Bob
Sorry (stupid THG comments not working, mutter, mutter)...
Use:
http://www.tomshardware.com/us/
Bob