Benchmark Test Settings
03:50 - Thursday 12 June 2008 by Rob Wright, Shelton Romhanyi
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: quad, sli, falcon
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: quad, sli, falcon
Table of content:
Google Ads
The Graphics Cards Articles and reviews
- Comparative Component Charts
- Best Graphics Cards for the Money: June 08
- Radeon 3850 AGP Plus Single-Core CPU
- GPU vs. CPU Upgrade: Extensive Tests
- NForce 780a SLI Debuts Hybrid SLI
- How To Overclock Your Graphics Card
- PCI Express 2.0 Graphics Cards: How Much Extra Performance Do They...
- Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX Review
- Nvidia GeForce 9800 GX2 Review
- The Best Gaming Graphics cards for Your Money: March 2008
Reviews
Forum
Related Content
Videos

Why not a test a game that isn't limited by CPU...like Cryshit
Care to actually explain why the FNW system got such low CPU utilisation on HD playback?
It would be nice to see the HD resolutions listed regularly (1920 x 1080) as people with this much grunt are undoubtedly using their PCs on HD TVs @ 1080p. I mean who on earth plays at resolutions over 2000 pixels wide?
I'm amazed at the poor selction of games that they have chosen to benchmark on. I mean 3 old games and 2 very CPU bound games. I seriously have no idea what they where thinking. Nobody is every going to get a quad/tri SLI setup and then go and play serious sam 2. I really hope they redo this with some good benchmarks: 3DMark Vantage, Crysis, Company of Heroes: OF and maybe Oblivion and UT3.
omg...where's crysis, where's ut3...hell where is oblivion?!
I thought this was supposed to be a thorough test, not just a means to show that quad-SLI performs less than 3-way SLI in SOME game titles...
i would like to comment, but i would just repeat whats already been said, this review gets two thumbs down.
Worst review ever.
Why did they test 3 ultra's against essentialy 4 8800GTS 512's. Also its not an equal test because the two system are different, they should have used the same mobo, processor, ram and hdd etc