Mac clone president slams Steve Jobs

01:00 - Thursday 17 April 2008 by Jane McEntegart, Tuan Nguyen in Los Angeles - source: Tom's Hardware

When a company hits the headlines with something big it’s bound to garner a bit of press interest, which is why we were a little surprised to see that the company touting the OpenMac machine seems to be so. . .unprepared for the amount of attention it’s receiving.

Miami based Psystar announced a Mac clone dubbed the OpenMac (now called Open Computer and Open Pro) this week and with a price tag a quarter of the price you’d pay for a real Mac, it wasn’t long before the Internet was buzzing with news.

The first bump in the road came when the Apple legal team discovered the fact that the OpenMac machine came bundled with Mac OS X 10.5 (aka Leopard). The EULA for Leopard states that the licence allows you to install, use and run one copy of the OS on a single Apple-labelled computer, operative words being Apple-labelled. In light of all these we decided we should cut to the chase and call Psystar ourselves.

After being bounced around a couple of times we finally got to talk to Rudy Pedraza, President of Psystar.

According to Pedraza :

"We’re here to help Steve Jobs. He’s not making enough money. We’re here help him increase sales."

Pedraza indicated that there’s a lot of bad press going on, but that all the the articles published so far were too quick to jump to conclusions.

When we asked about Apple’s EULA for Leopard and that no one was allowed to use Leopard on a computer that wasn’t Apple-labeled, Pedraza said "we’re going to do it whether Steve Jobs likes it or not."

Of course, we don’t need to tell you, were there’s a lawsuit, there’s several journalists sniffing around for a story.

Engadget attempted to ask Psystar about its involvement with OSx86 Project and determined that Psystar did not get permission from developers working on the OSx86 Project to sell their work. Netkas, the company who developed the EFI emulator Psystar is using, dubbed the Psystar crowd “liars” in a blog entry and told Engadget that not only did they contact Psystar when they heard about OpenMac but the Mac cloning company never got back to them. We also asked Pedraza if he knew about the OSx86 Project, and he said "of course." But Pedraza said that there’s a misunderstanding with the folks behind OSx86 Project. Pedraza said that "Psystar’s lawyers are in discussion with OSx86, otherwise we can’t comment."

If that wasn’t enough, the physical address listed on the Psystar website changed half way through the day. This address housed USA Koen Pack, a company that is in no way affiliated with Psystar. Gizmodo spoke to the manager of USA Koen Pack who claims the company has been at that address for two years. When we asked about the three address changes inside a week Pedraza confirmed that the address that was currently listed on the site was incorrect. When we asked for the correct address, Pedraza said he’d update the address (for the fourth time) right away, all while he was on the phone with us. The new address is now live on the Psystar website (changed from 10481 NW 28th St. to 10475). Pedraza said that the company needed to change its location to deal with the huge flow of incoming orders.

At the mention of Gizmodo’s investigation, Pedraza laughed and replied :

"Gizmodo got it completely wrong. Sorry Gizmodo - stick to News !"

We asked Pedraza what he thought about the coverage his company was receiving, he quickly chastised both Gizmodo and Engadget :

Pedraza : "well you gotta cover what’s hot [laughs]."
Tom’s : "You’re saying they got the wrong information ?"
Pedraza : "Gotta get those hits right ?"

Earlier today, Psystar made a statement that it was no longer taking credit card orders due to down time with the processing system. We asked Pedraza about this and he said that the company is taking orders through PayPal now until credit card processing system can be brought back up. Prior to speaking to Pedraza directly, a Psystar phone receptionist told us that the company was processing credit card orders and wasn’t offline at all.

We’ll post more information as it comes.

[Editors’ note : This story was written on authentic Apple notebooks.]

Comments
Add your comment
Read the comments on the forums
polarity 17/04/2008 08:08
Hide
-0+

Apple have to have the dumbest marketing department out there. Marketing is about selling your product to as many people as possible. Selling only expensive computers means you lose out on the huge budget market. Apple is a totally snobby rich people only club.

I could understand them complaining if it was competing with their own computers, but at the moment it's like the RIAA saying every act of piracy is a lost sale. Not everyone who buys one of these things would buy an Apple, not being able to afford them.

LukeBird 17/04/2008 10:28
Hide
-0+

polarity, you couldn't be more wrong. Apple ahve the most intelligent marketing on the planet. Simple adverts, simple stores, not masses of advertising and their stock flies of the shelves! If that's dumb marketing, what the hell is intelligent marketing?

spuddyt 17/04/2008 11:31
Hide
-0+

jacking the price up even more? and still getting morons to buy?

LePhuronn 17/04/2008 11:44
Hide
-0+

Guys, you're both right - Apple is a snobby rich boys club with fantastic marketing.

Apple stock flies off the shelves because rich kids and "young executives" with more money than brains want shiny Jobsware. Apple marketing exploits this so very very well.

However I agree with polarity's sentiment that marketing is about selling your proudct to as many people as possible, and the closed-group that is Mac is a really silly move, especially now Macs and PCs have identical guts.

How much would Microsoft tremble if Mac OS was freely available for PCs? Steve Jobs would be in the perfect position to do this if Apple officially released a BIOS-compatible OSX or simply supported the OSx86 project.

Of course then Apple would have to justify the stupid money they charge for Mac memory and shiny cases, but they'd be no different than Dell XPS, Alienware or similar "premium" systems so I doubt Apple would lose hardware share - people are buying PCs anyway, so how about an official user-friendly Windows alternative?

LukeBird 17/04/2008 13:56
Hide
-0+

Narrow-minded windows fanboys I see... Nice work there!

polarity 17/04/2008 17:01
Hide
-0+

At least the poor morons have an excuse.

They could just allow OSX86 (as an add on to a legal copy of OSX), but not give support, kind of like they did with early bootcamp. The people behind it are already doing a great job (in some areas better than apple does for Macs).

"windows fanboys" *points* *laughs* You're the one who's narrow minded to think that just becuase I'm bashing Apple I must be a Windows fanboy. Vista is what made me go out and buy a MBP, and it's been my main system since. My opinion of Apple has been pretty high. Them possibly bricking said MBP (and some other people's too) with their latest firmware update hasn't helped though (went to sleep, didn't wake up). Especially as they love to deny anything is wrong, instead expecting people to fork out to fix problems they caused.

I think that's something people really hate about Apple. They like to pretend their computers are infallible, instead of just admiting to problems and showing how much better they are when it comes to customer support. I'll see how things go at the Genius Bar...

LukeBird 17/04/2008 17:41
Hide
-0+

Well your comments sounded nothing more than Apple-bashing.
And lets face it, it's not like enough of that goes on here is it...

Comments are closed on this page.
Ads

Best offers

Desktops Previous news

Newsletters