Test Results: Load
What about the system power consumption under heavy and full load?
Athlon X2 7750

For the Athlon X2 7750, we saved about 5 watts with Cool'n'Quiet enabled, and gain as much by lowering the voltage. So, in effect, we've doubled the savings (about 10 to 18%), but the savings are actually quite small (10 watts versus 5 watts compared to no power management at all).
Athlon X2 7850

With the Athlon X2 7850, there’s really no difference between using no power management and enabling Cool'n'Quiet. We only save power when we lower the operating voltage, in which case power consumption went from 138 watts to 110 watts (a savings of 28 watts or 20%).
Athlon II X2 250

Compared to the other dual-core processors, the savings we see with Athlon II X2 250 seem small (from 110 watts to 106 watts with Cool'n'Quiet). But consider that this chip is already the most energy efficient of the three. With lowered voltages, system power consumption at full load is only 100 watts.
Note: Pairing this processor to a Socket AM3-based motherboard brought down system power consumption at full load to just 84 watts. That means you should be able to save 10 to 15 watts just by moving to a modern platform.
Phenom II X3 710

With the Phenom II X3 710, there’s practically no difference in power consumption if we’re still using default voltages. Once you’ve lowered them (from 1.25V to 1.125V), we save quite a bit (around 16 to 19 watts or about 15%).
Phenom II X4 945

With all cores loaded, the system with the Phenom II X4 945 demands quite a bit of juice at default settings. Like the Phenom II X3 710, there’s practically no difference between not using power management and enabling Cool'n'Quiet with the “Balanced” policy. It’s only after we lower the voltages from 1.35/1.1V to 1.075/1.1V do we see any change--significant savings, we might add. We went from 176-177 watts to 124 watts (a savings of 53 watts or 29%).
Phenom II X4 955

The Phenom II X4 955 seems to consume about 15 watts more than the Phenom II X4 945, almost reaching 200 watts without voltage adjustments. With a little bit of voltage tweaking, you can lower power consumption to more manageable levels (130 watts).
Note: As with the Athlon II X2 250, we saw a similar drop in full load power consumption numbers for the Phenom II X4 955 on an AM3-based platform. Power consumption at load is about 120 watts. For those who are interested in running a quad core system under 100 watts, you definitely should look at the Athlon II X4 620. Power consumption at load is just 98 watts.
Latest Tweaking & Tuning News
- 10/02 – CPU Performance Boosted 20% When CPU, GPU Collaborate
- 19/01 – Intel's Creates New Protection Plan Just for Overclockers
- 04/01 – Tom's Hardware Benchmark Charts and Database Updated
- 04/01 – AMD Radeon HD 7970 Quad CrossFireX Stomps 3DMark Records
- 29/12 – Gigabyte's X79-UD3 With New F7 BIOS Sets X79 Records
Latest Tweaking & Tuning reviews
- 27/12 – Four High-End Quad-Channel DDR3 Memory Kits For X79, Reviewed
- 23/12 – System Builder Marathon, Dec. 2011: System Value Compared
- 21/12 – System Builder Marathon, Dec. 2011: $600 Gaming PC
- 20/12 – System Builder Marathon, Dec. 2011: $1200 Enthusiast PC
- 19/12 – System Builder Marathon, Dec. 2011: $2400 Performance PC
Thanks for that, as well as the article.
I said this before on the preliminary article and I'll say it again... why is the 710 running at a NB frequency of 1600MHz when others on that platform are running at 1800MHz? I've got mine on a GA-MA78G-DS3H with a 2000MHz NB, so the CPU is perfectly capable of running at its default speed. I don't know... maybe I'm missing something here, and I'm very happy for you to tell me what it is!
Additionally, I've gotten optimised steppings of 1.6, 1.9, 2.2 and 2.6GHz at slightly higher (say, 0.25v) voltages than you have and it works fine on the DS3H.
This article is a nice read. Now I can use the tips they have on intel 25w test and this and build a great, cheap and energy efficient HTPC. Just wondering, does this apply on 785g mobos say like the asus m4-evo?