Phenom II X4 955: AMD's Dragon Platform Evolves
Table of contents
We were frankly a little surprised when AMD introduced its Socket AM3 interface two months ago next to a handful of lower-end CPUs, especially with the Phenom II X4 940 already available on AM2+ platforms. Not that the triple-core Phenom II X3 700- and cache-hacked X4 800-series chips were snoozers or anything, but…alright, actually, they were a little dry--especially in benchmark charts comparing them to quick quad-core CPUs with all of their cache intact.
Of course, AMD’s big story back then was interoperability. You could buy any of those newer, cheaper processors and plug them right into Socket AM3 boards or older Socket AM2+ platforms employing DDR2 memory technology. Pricier DDR3 modules didn’t fit AMD’s value message as well, so the company understandably de-emphasized the importance of AM3—at least right out of the gate.
But the story has changed a little bit for AMD since then. To begin, it has a new flagship processor able to drop into the AM3 socket. It also has a new graphics solution in the Radeon HD 4890, ready to help bolster the Dragon platform’s overall performance. And there’s also an updated version of AMD Overdrive in development, now at version 3.0 and purportedly able to enhance setups employing DDR3 memory.
A Little History: Dragon, Then And Now
When AMD launched the Dragon platform in January of this year, it consisted of a Phenom II X4 processor, ATI’s Radeon HD 4800-series graphics cards, and AMD’s 7-series chipsets. More commonly, a model Dragon setup described by AMD included a Phenom II X4 940, a Radeon HD 4870, and a 790GX-based motherboard.
AMD says that every single component of Dragon has changed in the few short months since then. It’s partly correct. After all, the company’s chipset lineup hasn’t been altered and, if the component roadmap we have on hand is correct, it won’t evolve until the beginning of 2010 when 790FX gives way to RD890/SB850. Believe it or not, 790GX will march into the sunset at that point, leaving 790X/SB850 to tend to the performance market. But we're getting ahead of ourselves.
There are new Phenom II X4s to discuss—now up to model 955 and 945 (the xx5 representing Socket AM3 compatibility and differentiating from the even-numbered 920/940). Socket AM3 support, as you know, shifts the platform from DDR2 to DDR3 memory. Moreover, the Radeon HD 4890 adds what we consider to be a fairly significant price premium (although prices after rebate are down to $229 online) in the interest of boosting game performance roughly 10% versus the 4870 1GB. Perhaps a little less significant, AMD recently started shipping a new PIB heatsink that is both narrower and shorter than the previous model.
And of course, there’s the new Overdrive application. We’ll get into that shortly. First, a little more detail on these new Phenom II X4 processors.

I can barely believe this article started off talking about the Dragon platform, then you go and use a 280gtx in the gaming benchmarks even though you know it throws up varying results with the Nehalems.
Here's an idea - use the Dragon platform. I'm sure you can find a 4890 or 4870 X2 lying around somewhere.
I wouldn't even have spotted that. Good point well made.

It's St George's day, I want a dragon!
The newest version of WinRAR, on the other hand, follows after previous iterations and utilizes as many threads as you can throw at it—hence the Core i7’s commanding victory.
More odd is the X3 720s parity with AMD’s X4 940—a CPU that is both 200 MHz faster and one core stronger. Nevertheless, AMD shows very well against Intel’s Core 2 Quad Q9550, besting it by 16 seconds in our 334 MB compression routine.
Does this not suggest memory is critical?
would've liked to seen benchmarks with a 720 with unlocked core and overclocked to 3.2ghz involved so we can guage value for money better.
These are enthusiast parts and therefore primarily used in gaming machines.
I don't know of anyone who sits at their computer all day doing number crunching tasks (were the i7 excels) who cares about a 20% difference in execution time (you go for a coffee / watch TV / play a game / "play"
So basically, unless you have a very specific application (you're a video editor for instance), what's the point in paying the 3x - 4x price premium for an i7 over an AMD? If you do, you're a mug - especially if the only reason is to brag you've got a faster machine.
So basically, unless you have a very specific application (you're a video editor for instance), what's the point in paying the 3x - 4x price premium for an i7 over an AMD? If you do, you're a mug - especially if the only reason is to brag you've got a faster machine.
Absolutely right. AMD is offering best buck for money here. Thinking selling my Core2Duo 6600 and going for Phenom II 955.
Why you don't use DDR3 1600MHz CL7 ???
Who will buy DDR3 1600MHz with CL6 ?
An overclocked X3 720 its a steal.
Superb value for money
An overclocked X3 720 BE its a steal.
Value for money cant get any better than this
An overclocked X3 720 BE its a steal.
Value for money cant get any better than this
An overclocked X3 720 BE its a steal.
Value for money cant get any better than this
I`m looking to build myself an i7 rig or AMD Phenom II one. What I`m looking at, are video conversions and lots of multitasking apps. It will take me a while to complete that, partly because I`m still saving for it, partly because I still don`t know if it`s worth extra 2000$ for i7 965 setup. And reading this article, I`m more confused than before.
Clearly i7 965 trashes amd in any test, but for what I need, it seems that 955 PhenomII will do just fine.......financially, I cannot afford another upgrade anytime soon....
So...what I really want? A super fast, future proof i7 chip or just a fast quad that will do for now??? I don`t know....I think I`ll stick wit my dual core for the next couple of years, cos I`m too confused..........
Picture of the heatsinks seems to be reversed in the pic describing the reduction in size of the new heastsink.
the 955 is a better processor than the i7 920 simply because of price, its like $50 cheaper, generally plays games better, and is almost as fast in every other area.
another thing to note: motherboards for intel are more expensive than amd ones.
bueno con una combinacion de un phenom II 955BE 16gb de DDR3-1333 pc3-10500 y cuatro targetas de graficas Ati Radeon HD4890 en un mother MSI
790FX-GD70 y cuatro discos Seagate de 500GB funcionan mejor en graficos que cualquier core i7 a la misma velocida ya que los board con chips intel solo pueden tener 3 targetas de video.