Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

Test Setup

by

System Hardware

Hardware
Details
CPU AMD
AMD Phenom II X4 955 (45 nm, 3.2 GHz, 4x 512 KB L2 and 6 MB L3 Cache, TDP 125 W, Rev. C2)
Motherboard (Socket AM3)
Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5F (Rev. 1.0)

Chipset: AMD 790GX, SB750

BIOS: 3L (04/08/2009)
RAM
2 x 2 GB DDR3-1600 (Corsair CM3X2G1600C9DHX)
 operating between DDR3-800 and 1600
Hard Drive
Western Digital VelociRaptor, 300 GB (WD3000HLFS)
10,000 RPM, SATA/300, 16 MB Cache
Blu-Ray Drive
LG GGW-H20L, SATA/150
Power Supply
PC Power & Cooling, Silencer 750EPS12V 750W
System Software and Drivers
Operating System
Windows Vista Enterprise Version 6.0 SP1 (Build 6000)
Drivers and Settings
Nvidia GeForce Drivers
Forceware 182.08
AMD Chipset Drivers
9.3


Benchmarks and Settings

Benchmarks
Details
3D Benchmarks and Settings
Crysis
Version: 1.2.1

Video Mode: 1680x1050

Overall Quality: low

Demo: CPU-Benchmark2 + Tom's Hardware Tool
Unreal Tournament 3
Version: 1.2

Video Mode: 1680x1050

Sound and DirectX10

Video Quality:
Texture Details: 1

Level Details: 1

Demo: vCTF-CONTAINMENT_fly

Time: 12/60
World In Conflict
Version: 1.0.0.9

Video Mode: 1680x1050 and 800x600

Video Quality: low details

Demo: Game-Benchmark
Audio Benchmarks and Settings
iTunes
Version: 7.7.1.11

Audio CD (Terminator II SE), 53 min

Default format AAC
Lame MP3
Version 3.98

Audio CD "Terminator II SE", 53 min

wave to mp3

160 Kbps
Video Benchmarks and Settings
Pinnacle Studio 12
Version: 12.0.0.6163

Encoding and Transition Rendering

DV camcorder movie

Video:
720x576 Pixels, PAL, 25 fps, 6000 Kbits/sec

Audio:
MPEG Layer 2, 224 Kbits/sec 16 Bit, Stereo 44.1 KHz

File Type: MPEG-2 (DVD Compatible)
TMPEG 4.5
Version: 4.5.1.254

Video: Terminator 2 SE DVD (720x576, 16:9) 5 Minutes

Audio: Dolby Digital, 48000 Hz, 6-Channel, English

Advanced Acoustic Engine MP3 Encoder (160 kbps, 44.1 KHz)
DivX 6.8.3
Version: 6.8.3

== Main Menu ==

default

== Codec Menu ==

Encoding mode: Insane Quality

Enhanced multithreading

Enabled using SSE4

Quarter-pixel search

== Video Menu ==

Quantization: MPEG-2
XviD 1.1.3
Version: 1.1.3

Other Options / Encoder Menu -

Display encoding status = off
Mainconcept Reference 1.5.1
Reference H. 264 Pluggin Pro 1.5.1
Version: 1.5.1

MPEG2 to MPEG2 (H.264)

MainConcept H.264/AVC Codec

28 sec HDTV 1920x1080 (MPEG2)

Audio:
MPEG2 (44.1 kHz, 2 Channel, 16 Bit, 224 kbps)

Codec: H.264

Mode: PAL (25 FPS)

Profile: Tom's Hardware Settings for Qct-Core
Adobe Premiere Pro CS3 HDTV
Mainconcept H.264 Pluggin 3.2
Windows Media Encoder 9.1 AP HDTV
Windows Audio Encoder 10 Pro
Version: 3.0

NTSC MPEG2-HDTV 1920x1080 (24 sec)

Import: Mainconcept NTSC HDTV 1080i

Export: Adobe Media Encoder

== Video ==

Windows Media Video 9 Advanced Profile

Encoding Passes: one
Bitrate
Mode: Constant

Frame: 1920x1080

Frame Rate: 29.97

Maximum Bitrate [kbps]: 2000

Image Quality: 50.00

== Audio ==

Windows Media Audio 10 Professional

Encoding Passes: one

Bitrate Mode: Constant

Audio Format:
160 kbps, 44.1 kHz, 2 channel 16 bit (A/V) CBR
Application Benchmarks and Settings
Grisoft AVG Anti-virus 8
Version: 8.0.134

Virus base: 270.4.5/1533

Benchmark

Scan: some compressed ZIP and RAR archives
Winrar 3.8
Version 3.80 BETA 4

WinZIP Commandline Version 2.3

Compression = Best

Dictionary = 4096 KB

Benchmark: THG-Workload
Winzip 11
Version 11.2 (8094)

Compression = Best

Benchmark: THG-Workload
Maxon Cinema 4D release 10
Version: 10.008

Rendering from a scene 
(Water drop at a Rose)

Resolution: 1280 x 1024 – 8-Bit (50 frames)
Adobe Photoshop CS3
Version: 10.0x20070321

Filtering a 69 MB TIF-Photo

Benchmark: Tomshardware-Benchmark V1.0.0.4

Programmed by Tomshardware using Delphi 2007

Filters:
Crosshatch

Glass

Sumi-e

Accented Edges

Angled Strokes

Sprayed Strokes
Deep Fritz 11
Version: 11

Fritz Chess Benchmark Version 4.2
Synthetic Benchmarks and Settings
3-DMark Vantage
Version: 1.02

Options: Performance

Graphics Test 1

Graphics Test 2

CPU Test 1

CPU Test 2
PCMark Vantage
Version: 1.00

PCMark Benchmark

Memories Benchmark

Windows Media Player 10.00.00.3646
Everest Ultimate Edition
Version 4.6

Memory Benchmark
Share:
7
Comments
Read more
X
Submit

Comments
Read the comments on the forums
danielzklein 04/06/2009 09:48
Hide
-0+

On page 3, under Motherboard, I think you meant to write 790FX, not GX, for the chipset.

Anonymous 09/06/2009 03:30
Hide
-0+

I don't mean to be rude but this is a somewhat naive article in my view(yeah I know it still sounds rude :) sorry!). Lets take a look how memory is tied to the CPU via the FSB, when we speak of 800Mhz FSB etc were not speaking of the speed of the bus but the speed in which the clock ticks right? the whole point of the clock is to keep things in sync otherwise the PC would crash almost constantly because you could be re-populating cache addresses that might still be in use by the last instruction , where am heading with this? well my point here is you could have that memory running at 200000mhz but that data still aint going to the processor until that clock(FSB)ticks.

Geeks love analogies right? here's one that illustrates my point perfectly. Every morning you wake up at 8am and prepare to catch the hourly bus to work this runs at 30 mins past the hr and usually gets you to work for 9am. On monday you have that monday feeling as a result your in a bit of a daze therefore it takes you 20 mins to prepare before going for the bus. Tuesday you have that fire back in you belly, and as a result of running around the house like a mad fool you manage to prepare in 10 mins before going for the bus. which day do you arrive at work the earliest? of course it's a trick question you arrive at the same time because you still have to wait for that flamin' slow bus(FSB) :)

For the reason outlined above the only time it is worthwhile using faster rated memory than your CPU rated FSB(quad pumped last time I looked) is if you plan to overclock it by increasing the FSB.

The slight improvements you do see in your benchmarks have more to do with reduced latency(not to be confused with speed)than any speed increases I believe.

PS. I keep thinking of better ways I could have put this across but as this is a comment and not an article it's probably not worth progressing it from the draft stage, hope it makes a lil' sense.

philipV 23/06/2009 22:06
Hide
-0+

I really dont understand why you guys didn't review ram speeds of 1800, 1866 and 2000, that is what I was expecting and was dissapointed. What puzzles me more is that you did review speeds of 800 and 1066. Anyone who is going to be using a P2 X4 will not be running DDR3 800.

reynod 06/07/2009 16:53
Hide
-0+

So 1333 vanilla if you have a bit of extra cash otherwise better quality good low latency 1066 is the go?

Can someone suggest a few brands?

Corsair TwinX ?

spearhead 27/07/2009 18:38
Hide
-0+

Phenom 955 is a suits my buget the best. We shall see what the DX11 cards will bring in september- august. then this guy here is going to buy him self an awsome gaming rig on a tight buget. the PC including the monitor should not cost me much more then €900 that is my buget here.
Core i7 might be awsome too you know but it costs more and you need an expansive fan too etc. I really have a hard time to justify any costs on one and another. anyway DDR3 prices are great now. 4GB of 1600mhz memory costs just €3-7 more then the 1333mhz version. So i definatly go for 1600mhz. I got a good system setup so far and it is just great AM3 now happend to be as affordable as am2+ was a few months ago. both AM3 and 1366 offer long term benefits and upgradability. When ever it is gulf town or orochi. I dont care which one is out first but i do care on the long term that i have a computer which is able to sustain its self for a long time. You can see it like this core i7 is a bit faster but costs more. phenom is a bit slower and costs less. however orochi should be a competitor for the gulftown. It happends to be a bit slower ofcourse but it should be cheaper. this might make a great upgrade path. You will have a computer upgrade for €150-250 somewhere in 2010-2012 depending on what you want to spend on new hardware and adding a new graphic card as well as a new cpu. I think this is good. However it is imporment to get a good motherboard for that from a manufacturer who is known for updating its bios for newer cpu's or else your screwd over. I perfer both ASUS and Gygabyte for this they are known for having quite a few of there am2 boards supporting am2+ and am3 cpus. Unlike asrock,foxconn and msi who screwd you over at that time not supporting the phenoms.

sirkillalot 18/09/2009 15:49
Hide
-0+

yep true ideedy i got the gygabyte for my 955 x4 flashed it in 4-5 mins with no problems what so ever
but im not confinced to upgrade my ram settings (still use my 667 ram)i find it all pretty much the same
4 gig minimim the rest on a good gpu

Best offers

Newsletters


OK