Test Setup
System Hardware
| Hardware | Details |
|---|---|
| CPU AMD | AMD Phenom II X4 955 (45 nm, 3.2 GHz, 4x 512 KB L2 and 6 MB L3 Cache, TDP 125 W, Rev. C2) |
| Motherboard (Socket AM3) | Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5F (Rev. 1.0)
Chipset: AMD 790GX, SB750 BIOS: 3L (04/08/2009) |
| RAM | 2 x 2 GB DDR3-1600 (Corsair CM3X2G1600C9DHX)
operating between DDR3-800 and 1600 |
| Hard Drive | Western Digital VelociRaptor, 300 GB (WD3000HLFS)
10,000 RPM, SATA/300, 16 MB Cache |
| Blu-Ray Drive | LG GGW-H20L, SATA/150 |
| Power Supply | PC Power & Cooling, Silencer 750EPS12V 750W |
| System Software and Drivers | |
| Operating System | Windows Vista Enterprise Version 6.0 SP1 (Build 6000) |
| Drivers and Settings | |
| Nvidia GeForce Drivers | Forceware 182.08 |
| AMD Chipset Drivers | 9.3 |
Benchmarks and Settings
| Benchmarks | Details |
|---|---|
| 3D Benchmarks and Settings | |
| Crysis | Version: 1.2.1 Video Mode: 1680x1050 Overall Quality: low Demo: CPU-Benchmark2 + Tom's Hardware Tool |
| Unreal Tournament 3 | Version: 1.2 Video Mode: 1680x1050 Sound and DirectX10 Video Quality: Texture Details: 1 Level Details: 1 Demo: vCTF-CONTAINMENT_fly Time: 12/60 |
| World In Conflict | Version: 1.0.0.9 Video Mode: 1680x1050 and 800x600 Video Quality: low details Demo: Game-Benchmark |
| Audio Benchmarks and Settings | |
| iTunes | Version: 7.7.1.11 Audio CD (Terminator II SE), 53 min Default format AAC |
| Lame MP3 | Version 3.98
Audio CD "Terminator II SE", 53 min wave to mp3 160 Kbps |
| Video Benchmarks and Settings | |
| Pinnacle Studio 12 | Version: 12.0.0.6163 Encoding and Transition Rendering DV camcorder movie Video: 720x576 Pixels, PAL, 25 fps, 6000 Kbits/sec Audio: MPEG Layer 2, 224 Kbits/sec 16 Bit, Stereo 44.1 KHz File Type: MPEG-2 (DVD Compatible) |
| TMPEG 4.5 | Version: 4.5.1.254 Video: Terminator 2 SE DVD (720x576, 16:9) 5 Minutes Audio: Dolby Digital, 48000 Hz, 6-Channel, English Advanced Acoustic Engine MP3 Encoder (160 kbps, 44.1 KHz) |
| DivX 6.8.3 | Version: 6.8.3 == Main Menu == default == Codec Menu == Encoding mode: Insane Quality Enhanced multithreading Enabled using SSE4 Quarter-pixel search == Video Menu == Quantization: MPEG-2 |
| XviD 1.1.3 | Version: 1.1.3
Other Options / Encoder Menu - Display encoding status = off |
| Mainconcept Reference 1.5.1 Reference H. 264 Pluggin Pro 1.5.1 | Version: 1.5.1
MPEG2 to MPEG2 (H.264) MainConcept H.264/AVC Codec 28 sec HDTV 1920x1080 (MPEG2) Audio: MPEG2 (44.1 kHz, 2 Channel, 16 Bit, 224 kbps) Codec: H.264 Mode: PAL (25 FPS) Profile: Tom's Hardware Settings for Qct-Core |
| Adobe Premiere Pro CS3 HDTV Mainconcept H.264 Pluggin 3.2 Windows Media Encoder 9.1 AP HDTV Windows Audio Encoder 10 Pro | Version: 3.0 NTSC MPEG2-HDTV 1920x1080 (24 sec) Import: Mainconcept NTSC HDTV 1080i Export: Adobe Media Encoder == Video == Windows Media Video 9 Advanced Profile Encoding Passes: one Bitrate Mode: Constant Frame: 1920x1080 Frame Rate: 29.97 Maximum Bitrate [kbps]: 2000 Image Quality: 50.00 == Audio == Windows Media Audio 10 Professional Encoding Passes: one Bitrate Mode: Constant Audio Format: 160 kbps, 44.1 kHz, 2 channel 16 bit (A/V) CBR |
| Application Benchmarks and Settings | |
| Grisoft AVG Anti-virus 8 | Version: 8.0.134
Virus base: 270.4.5/1533 Benchmark Scan: some compressed ZIP and RAR archives |
| Winrar 3.8 | Version 3.80 BETA 4
WinZIP Commandline Version 2.3 Compression = Best Dictionary = 4096 KB Benchmark: THG-Workload |
| Winzip 11 | Version 11.2 (8094) Compression = Best Benchmark: THG-Workload |
| Maxon Cinema 4D release 10 | Version: 10.008
Rendering from a scene (Water drop at a Rose) Resolution: 1280 x 1024 – 8-Bit (50 frames) |
| Adobe Photoshop CS3 | Version: 10.0x20070321 Filtering a 69 MB TIF-Photo Benchmark: Tomshardware-Benchmark V1.0.0.4 Programmed by Tomshardware using Delphi 2007 Filters: Crosshatch Glass Sumi-e Accented Edges Angled Strokes Sprayed Strokes |
| Deep Fritz 11 | Version: 11 Fritz Chess Benchmark Version 4.2 |
| Synthetic Benchmarks and Settings | |
| 3-DMark Vantage | Version: 1.02
Options: Performance Graphics Test 1 Graphics Test 2 CPU Test 1 CPU Test 2 |
| PCMark Vantage | Version: 1.00 PCMark Benchmark Memories Benchmark Windows Media Player 10.00.00.3646 |
| Everest Ultimate Edition | Version 4.6 Memory Benchmark |
7
Comments
Sponsored
Latest Memory News
Latest Memory reviews
- 27/12 – Four High-End Quad-Channel DDR3 Memory Kits For X79, Reviewed
- 05/09 – Seven 8 GB DDR3 Memory Kits For Your AMD A75 Motherboard
- 18/04 – Eight 8 GB (2 x 4 GB) Memory Kits For P67 Express, Rounded Up
- 23/11 – Memory Upgrade: Is It Time To Add More RAM?
- 05/08 – A Tour Of The Kingston Memory Factory In Taiwan
On page 3, under Motherboard, I think you meant to write 790FX, not GX, for the chipset.
I don't mean to be rude but this is a somewhat naive article in my view(yeah I know it still sounds rude
sorry!). Lets take a look how memory is tied to the CPU via the FSB, when we speak of 800Mhz FSB etc were not speaking of the speed of the bus but the speed in which the clock ticks right? the whole point of the clock is to keep things in sync otherwise the PC would crash almost constantly because you could be re-populating cache addresses that might still be in use by the last instruction , where am heading with this? well my point here is you could have that memory running at 200000mhz but that data still aint going to the processor until that clock(FSB)ticks.

Geeks love analogies right? here's one that illustrates my point perfectly. Every morning you wake up at 8am and prepare to catch the hourly bus to work this runs at 30 mins past the hr and usually gets you to work for 9am. On monday you have that monday feeling as a result your in a bit of a daze therefore it takes you 20 mins to prepare before going for the bus. Tuesday you have that fire back in you belly, and as a result of running around the house like a mad fool you manage to prepare in 10 mins before going for the bus. which day do you arrive at work the earliest? of course it's a trick question you arrive at the same time because you still have to wait for that flamin' slow bus(FSB)
For the reason outlined above the only time it is worthwhile using faster rated memory than your CPU rated FSB(quad pumped last time I looked) is if you plan to overclock it by increasing the FSB.
The slight improvements you do see in your benchmarks have more to do with reduced latency(not to be confused with speed)than any speed increases I believe.
PS. I keep thinking of better ways I could have put this across but as this is a comment and not an article it's probably not worth progressing it from the draft stage, hope it makes a lil' sense.
I really dont understand why you guys didn't review ram speeds of 1800, 1866 and 2000, that is what I was expecting and was dissapointed. What puzzles me more is that you did review speeds of 800 and 1066. Anyone who is going to be using a P2 X4 will not be running DDR3 800.
So 1333 vanilla if you have a bit of extra cash otherwise better quality good low latency 1066 is the go?
Can someone suggest a few brands?
Corsair TwinX ?
Phenom 955 is a suits my buget the best. We shall see what the DX11 cards will bring in september- august. then this guy here is going to buy him self an awsome gaming rig on a tight buget. the PC including the monitor should not cost me much more then €900 that is my buget here.
Core i7 might be awsome too you know but it costs more and you need an expansive fan too etc. I really have a hard time to justify any costs on one and another. anyway DDR3 prices are great now. 4GB of 1600mhz memory costs just €3-7 more then the 1333mhz version. So i definatly go for 1600mhz. I got a good system setup so far and it is just great AM3 now happend to be as affordable as am2+ was a few months ago. both AM3 and 1366 offer long term benefits and upgradability. When ever it is gulf town or orochi. I dont care which one is out first but i do care on the long term that i have a computer which is able to sustain its self for a long time. You can see it like this core i7 is a bit faster but costs more. phenom is a bit slower and costs less. however orochi should be a competitor for the gulftown. It happends to be a bit slower ofcourse but it should be cheaper. this might make a great upgrade path. You will have a computer upgrade for €150-250 somewhere in 2010-2012 depending on what you want to spend on new hardware and adding a new graphic card as well as a new cpu. I think this is good. However it is imporment to get a good motherboard for that from a manufacturer who is known for updating its bios for newer cpu's or else your screwd over. I perfer both ASUS and Gygabyte for this they are known for having quite a few of there am2 boards supporting am2+ and am3 cpus. Unlike asrock,foxconn and msi who screwd you over at that time not supporting the phenoms.
yep true ideedy i got the gygabyte for my 955 x4 flashed it in 4-5 mins with no problems what so ever
but im not confinced to upgrade my ram settings (still use my 667 ram)i find it all pretty much the same
4 gig minimim the rest on a good gpu