Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Conclusion

System Builder Marathon, March 2010: $3,000 Extreme PC
By

Constantly-advancing technologies assure that “future proof” systems will never exist. But a little consideration of near-term improvements should allow a system to remain useful a little while longer than some of the haphazard tier-one builds we still see from time to time.

To that end, we believe we’ve covered every aspect of upgradeability in today’s high-priced build. Easy upgrades such as additional memory modules, an additional graphics card, or even a replacement CPU with additional cores should be able to keep this particular system near the top of the performance curve for at least a year or two, and we even have the extra power supply capacity to support those upgrades.

Overclocking did push us up against the limits of our 2x 120mm radiator, but not before we reached impressive 62% CPU and 31% GPU overclocks. Those who’d like to push the GPU farther will find that the case and pump can easily handle an upgrade to a 3x 120mm replacement, and that this type of upgrade can still be made within our original budget.

Yet we’d have preferred a second high-capacity storage drive for similar money, to enable RAID 1 redundancy. With no consensus between builders and readers over the value of these features, pocketing the price difference was an easy way to avoid conflict.

Raising the budget for this month’s system allowed us to avoid regret completely, with an extra $400 spent on cooling (including the more expensive video card model) that would have otherwise forced us to sacrifice the SSD drives. Reaching our goals without pushing the limit of this new budget should help this system score extra points in Thursday’s value analysis.

Display all 7 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • 0 Hide
    mi1ez , 16 March 2010 16:43
    RAID SSDs? No TRIM support there then!
  • 3 Hide
    ch1llboy , 17 March 2010 13:10
    920? really tomshardware! I do look to you for advice often and to see you recommend a chip that has been replaced by the 930 kind shocks and disappoints me. I have confidence that you will make good and update your article. It is 2% more expensive and 5% higher clocked at stock. It overclocks better because it has the 21x multiplier. It removes the cpu blk wall for those of us on air buying 300+ motherboards that can take the blk to 215. It is what I'm buying because 4.4 ghz is better than 4.1.
  • 2 Hide
    BlackKnight7891 , 19 March 2010 04:13
    It would be Nice to see some CPU\GPU temps through the testing especially when when testing the overclock against Crysis
  • 1 Hide
    LePhuronn , 19 March 2010 20:29
    Samsung SpinPoint F3s surely?
  • 0 Hide
    Anonymous , 13 July 2010 22:14
    hey all am looking for special desktop specs for animation design with high quality
  • 0 Hide
    mi1ez , 14 July 2010 00:02
    try the forums then rather than article comments...
  • 0 Hide
    LePhuronn , 14 July 2010 00:19
    Looking at it now, I'd also tweak things to run 2 5870s in Crossfire and drop the PSU to a 850W - games that don't benefit from Crossfire (i.e. GTA 4) will see better single-GPU performance from a full fat 5870 instead of the underclocked 5870 on the dual-GPU card, assuming of course that the 5970 is detected as an internal Crossfire setup by these games.