03:10 - Wednesday 23 April 2008 by Patrick Schmid and Achim Roos
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: pci, express, 2.0
Categories: Graphics
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: pci, express, 2.0
Categories: Graphics
Table of content:
Absolute Benchmark Results
Ad
Radeon HD 3850
Clearly, Microsoft Flight Simulator X requires a lot of graphics bandwidth to provide high-detail textures in the system memory. A decrease of PCI Express bandwidth has a tremendous impact on frame rates here.
The new PCMark Vantage is mostly unimpressed by the bandwidth changes. Obviously, this test is mostly GPU bound, working out of the local frame buffer.
- Previous page Benchmarks and Settings
- Next page GeForce 9800 GX2
Sponsored links
Sponsored links
Ad
The Graphics Cards Articles and reviews
News
Reviews
Forum
- Video card upgrade for HP A6402f
- Does this sound like a decent Gaming computer? (for the price)
- which system
- buying extreme gaming machine - need advice please
- Dell Inspiron 531s for my camper van?!?!
- 22' LCD Vs 24" Monitor for Gaming Rig
- Need help buying gaming monitor!
- HDTV capture card.
- not sure what monitor. i'm not clear, unsure what to choose
- I need advice or help for LCD 22" or 24",
Sponsored links
Related Content
-
pci express 2.0 x16
-
flight simulator x benchmark
-
flight simulator x graphics card
-
flight simulator x benchmarks
-
games benchmark
-
pci express® 2.0 x16
-
pci express 2.0 cards
-
microsoft flight simulator x frame rates
-
flight simulator x video card requirements
-
flight simulator x graphics cards
-
microsoft flight simulator x benchmarks
-
pci express cards work in pci express 2.0
-
best graphics card for microsoft flight simulator x
-
microsoft flight simulator graphic card
-
what is graphic card x16 x8
Videos
Partners
The x1 mark is wrong in the diagram- it's the gap right after the key, not ON the key!
My nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS 512 is marketed as being PCIe 2.0. Why is this not listed?
Typo on the last page referring to 9800GX2 as 9900.
My nVidia GeForce 8800GS 384MB is marketed as being PCIe 2.0. Why is this not listed?
This article is terribly misleading and does not test what it promises. It's only purpose is to test PCIe 2.0 x16 against PCIe 2.0 x8, x4 and x1.
Woulda been nice if they actually tested PCIe 2.0 (x16) against PCIe 1.1 since this would actually be of some relevance and importance to us. Anyone else think so?
This article is terribly misleading and does not test what it promises. It's only purpose is to test PCIe 2.0 x16 against PCIe 2.0 x8, x4 and x1.
Woulda been nice if they actually tested PCIe 2.0 (x16) against PCIe 1.1 since this would actually be of some relevance and importance to us. Anyone else think so?
I agree