Max Payne
06:00 - Wednesday 6 February 2002 by Thomas Pabst
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: pc, graphics, beyond, xbox
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: pc, graphics, beyond, xbox
Table of content:
Max Payne
Ad
In Max Payne, a DirectX 8 game, the differences are significantly larger. Here, even the "smaller" GeForce4 Ti is ahead of the Ti500. At 1600x1200, the GeForce4 Ti4600 achieved double the frame rate as ATI's RADEON 8500! The MX460 was also surprising - this beat the GeForce3 Ti200 by a nose.
At 1024x768, the Ti4600 with the 2x FSAA activated is faster than the GeForce3 Ti500 without FSAA! Even at 1280x1024, the Ti4600 with 2X reaches the scores of the Ti500. In contrast, the performance loss of the GeForce4 MX460 with 2X FSAA is much more evident than with the Ti500 series.
- Previous page Benchmarks
- Next page Aquanox
Ad
Google Ads
Ad
The Miscellaneous Articles and reviews
- Too Much Of A Good Thing? The Lowdown On 128MB GeForce3 Ti200 Cards
- Everything There Is To Know About the Xbox: Technology, Games,...
- Mini CDR Madness: Evolution or Revolution?
- Clash Of The OC'd Titans: Athlon XP 2300+ vs. Pentium 4/3000
- Aquanox - Bringing 3D To Its Knees
- A Lackluster Premiere: ALi Aladdin-P4
- Tom's Hardware Speed Project: Pentium 4, Over 3 GHz!
- Vertex Shaders and Pixel Shaders
- Terratec DMX 6Fire 24/96 vs. Sound Blaster Audigy Platinum
- CES 2002 Day 2: New Solutions And Surprises
News
Reviews
Related Content
