Results
| NextHardware | Hiwa-Zilla-Qballe | Extreme Hardware | Memory Extreme | |
| PiFast | 17.24 | 17.25 | 17.07 | 16.86 |
| SuperPI 1M | 8.034 | 7.816 | 7.769 | 7.768 |
| SuperPI 32M | 10:17:854 | 11:19:142 | ||
| Wprime 32M | 12.870 | 12.886 | 12.760 | |
| Wprime 1024M | 430.154 | 420.342 | 419.749 | |
| Aquamark | 194,175 | 211,925 | ||
| 3DMark01 | 78938 | |||
| 3DMark03 | 69399 | |||
| 3DMark05 | 28879 | 30602 | ||
| 3DMark06 | 19750 | 21249 |
Team Memory Extreme, after the first day’s difficulties and those encountered on the morning of the second day, changed strategy. Following all the benchmarks to mark a score, they then improved all the results one by one. It seems that the strategy was successful—Memory Extreme reached the first position in 9 out of 10 specialties, followed by Team Hiwa-Zilla-Qballe. It was third place for NextHardware, while closing the ranks was Extreme Hardware, due to two burned motherboards putting them out of the challenge.
Read more
Sponsored
