Page 1:Welcome Back, SLI!
Page 2:Motherboard And Graphics
Page 3:Processor And Memory
Page 5:Case, Cooling, And Power
Page 6:Hardware Installation
Page 7:Overclocking, Or Maybe Not
Page 8:Test Settings And Benchmarks
Page 9:Benchmark Results: 3DMark And PCMark
Page 10:Benchmark Results: SiSoftware Sandra
Page 11:Benchmark Results: Crysis And F1 2010
Page 12:Benchmark Results: Just Cause 2 And Metro 2033
Page 13:Benchmark Results: Audio And Video Encoding
Page 14:Benchmark Results: Productivity
Page 15:Power, Heat, And Efficiency
Page 16:Is There Value In A $2000 Build?
System Builder Marathon, September 2011: The Articles
Here are links to each of the four articles in this month’s System Builder Marathon (we’ll update them as each story is published). And remember, these systems are all being given away at the end of the marathon.
To enter the giveaway, please fill out this Google form, and be sure to read the complete rules before entering!
Superb multi-card scaling is part of the reason why Tom’s Hardware editors have used AMD graphics hardware in every System Builder Marathon machine this year, a fact that may have escaped die-hard AMD fans who've missed seeing the company's CPUs compete up at the top of the spectrum.
And yet, just because we've doted on AMD's graphics-oriented value doesn't mean the company enjoys performance superiority. The fact remains that Nvidia has the most powerful GPU around in its GeForce GTX 580. The only reason we've shied away from its high-performance flagship up until now was that the cost of other necessary system components gobbled up our budget first. That is, until today.
With Intel’s super-fast Sandy Bridge processors and high-end SSDs already populating our top-end build, graphics performance was one of the few places we could noticeably improve the performance of our $2000 configuration without significantly expanding our budget. Recent drops in memory and motherboard prices brought us within $120 of our graphics upgrade goal, forcing us to scale back on two specific items that you’ll certainly notice in the finished system photo.
|$2000 Performance System Components|
|Motherboard||Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3: LGA 1155 Intel Z68 Express||$150|
|Graphics||2 x EVGA 015-P3-1580-AR GeForce GTX 580 SLI||$980|
|Processor||Intel Core i7-2600K: 3.4 GHz-3.8 GHz, 8 MB Shared L3 Cache||$315|
|Memory||G.Skill F3-14900CL9D-8GBXL: DDR3-1866 C9, 4 GB x 2 (8 GB)||$80|
|System Drive||Adata S511 120 GB, SATA 6Gb/s SSD||$170|
|Storage Drive||Western Digital Caviar Green WD20EARS 2 TB, 7200 RPM HDD||$80|
|Optical||Lite-On iHAS224-06: 24x DVD±R 8x DVD+RW 6x DVD-RW||$21|
|Case||Antec Three Hundred Illusion||$70|
|Power||Seasonic SS-850HT: 850 W, ATX12V v2.31, 80 PLUS Silver||$120|
|Heat Sink||Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus RR-B10-212P-G1||$30|
Putting all of our sacrifices out in the open, we scaled back on the two items all readers could see from the outside: the case and the optical drive. While we truly believe a high-end multi-purpose system should probably have an Blu-ray burner, the higher-performance graphics cards would boost the score of today’s build in our value comparison.
The case, on the other hand, would only affect perceived worth, since the Antec Three Hundred Illusion has already proven itself an excellent performer through several of our earlier builds.
While today’s build appears to be a budget-buster, its price is $16 higher since we place our order. That's right, it was exactly a $2000 collection of hardware a month ago.
- Welcome Back, SLI!
- Motherboard And Graphics
- Processor And Memory
- Case, Cooling, And Power
- Hardware Installation
- Overclocking, Or Maybe Not
- Test Settings And Benchmarks
- Benchmark Results: 3DMark And PCMark
- Benchmark Results: SiSoftware Sandra
- Benchmark Results: Crysis And F1 2010
- Benchmark Results: Just Cause 2 And Metro 2033
- Benchmark Results: Audio And Video Encoding
- Benchmark Results: Productivity
- Power, Heat, And Efficiency
- Is There Value In A $2000 Build?